Oedipus’s Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Luck According to Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel
In mythology, Oedipus is impelled, by destiny or fate, to perform a set of actions. Given that he is not responsible for his fate or luck, is he responsible for his crimes? Can moral judgments be independent of luck, chance or fortune? Nagel suggests an example: two agents (with the same intentions,...
Main Author: | Rui Rego |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Athens Institute for Education and Research
2023-04-01
|
Series: | Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts |
Online Access: | https://www.athensjournals.gr/humanities/2023-10-2-1-Rego.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Crossroads and gears: Oedipus’s destiny in The infernal machine, by Jean Cocteau
by: Roberto Rossi Menegotto, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Luck, mystery and supremacy: D. Z. Phillips reads Nagel and Williams on Morality
by: Mulhall, S
Published: (2007) -
Moral Luck from Bernard Williams’ Point of View
by: Zahra Khazai ; Fatemeh Tamaddon
Published: (2016-08-01) -
How to (dis)solve Nagel's paradox about moral luck and responsibility
by: Fernando Rudy Hiller -
Bernard Williams's Different View of Moral Responsibility
by: Fatemeh TamaddonFard
Published: (2020-08-01)