Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences

U.S. consumers see retail beef products with "no added hormones" (NAH) labels. However, similar labels appear on pork and chicken products, even though hormone use in their production is prohibited. This study assesses consumer perceptions of hormone use in different livestock species. Usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruoye Yang, Kellie Curry Raper, Jayson L. Lusk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/298437
_version_ 1818897024145162240
author Ruoye Yang
Kellie Curry Raper
Jayson L. Lusk
author_facet Ruoye Yang
Kellie Curry Raper
Jayson L. Lusk
author_sort Ruoye Yang
collection DOAJ
description U.S. consumers see retail beef products with "no added hormones" (NAH) labels. However, similar labels appear on pork and chicken products, even though hormone use in their production is prohibited. This study assesses consumer perceptions of hormone use in different livestock species. Using choice experiment data, we then examine the impact of these perceptions on preferences for unlabeled meat products and willingness to pay for NAH-labeled meat products. Results suggest that consumer perceptions of hormone use in production are incorrect. Further, perceptions influence consumer preferences and willingness to pay for unlabeled products versus those with NAH labels.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:09:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91b4c8291d2b4114ad7f9b5bfe65f892
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:09:36Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
record_format Article
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
spelling doaj.art-91b4c8291d2b4114ad7f9b5bfe65f8922022-12-21T20:09:20ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852020-01-0145110712310.22004/ag.econ.298437298437Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat PreferencesRuoye YangKellie Curry RaperJayson L. LuskU.S. consumers see retail beef products with "no added hormones" (NAH) labels. However, similar labels appear on pork and chicken products, even though hormone use in their production is prohibited. This study assesses consumer perceptions of hormone use in different livestock species. Using choice experiment data, we then examine the impact of these perceptions on preferences for unlabeled meat products and willingness to pay for NAH-labeled meat products. Results suggest that consumer perceptions of hormone use in production are incorrect. Further, perceptions influence consumer preferences and willingness to pay for unlabeled products versus those with NAH labels.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/298437food labelingmeat demandwillingness to pay
spellingShingle Ruoye Yang
Kellie Curry Raper
Jayson L. Lusk
Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
food labeling
meat demand
willingness to pay
title Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
title_full Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
title_fullStr Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
title_short Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
title_sort impact of hormone use perceptions on consumer meat preferences
topic food labeling
meat demand
willingness to pay
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/298437
work_keys_str_mv AT ruoyeyang impactofhormoneuseperceptionsonconsumermeatpreferences
AT kelliecurryraper impactofhormoneuseperceptionsonconsumermeatpreferences
AT jaysonllusk impactofhormoneuseperceptionsonconsumermeatpreferences