Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?

The study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive kno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maris Juhkam, Anna-Liisa Jõgi, Piret Soodla, Mikko Aro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103/full
_version_ 1797730127602253824
author Maris Juhkam
Anna-Liisa Jõgi
Piret Soodla
Mikko Aro
author_facet Maris Juhkam
Anna-Liisa Jõgi
Piret Soodla
Mikko Aro
author_sort Maris Juhkam
collection DOAJ
description The study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge during the intervention contributes to the reading comprehension outcome. The sample consisted of 301 Grade 3 students, of whom 77 had learning difficulties. Analyzes of (co)variances were used for estimating the effects of reciprocal teaching on the development of reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge. Multigroup path analysis was used for testing the effect of increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge on reading comprehension. We found reciprocal teaching had a positive effect on reading comprehension, especially for students with learning difficulties. Reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge improved significantly, but similarly in both the intervention and control groups. However, the increase in metacognitive knowledge only contributed to reading comprehension in the intervention group, not in the control group. The study sheds light on the cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms underlying students’ reading comprehension process, emphasizing metacognitive knowledge and especially the systematic practice of reading strategies as key factors in improving reading comprehension.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:39:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91b697a56900481d9ff234c53d63b93d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:39:45Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-91b697a56900481d9ff234c53d63b93d2023-08-31T19:14:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-08-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11911031191103Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?Maris Juhkam0Anna-Liisa Jõgi1Piret Soodla2Mikko Aro3Tallinn University, Tallinn, EstoniaTallinn University, Tallinn, EstoniaTallinn University, Tallinn, EstoniaUniversity of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FinlandThe study examined the effect of reciprocal teaching on students’ reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies, especially among students with learning difficulties. The special focus was to assess how the increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge during the intervention contributes to the reading comprehension outcome. The sample consisted of 301 Grade 3 students, of whom 77 had learning difficulties. Analyzes of (co)variances were used for estimating the effects of reciprocal teaching on the development of reading comprehension, reading fluency, and metacognitive knowledge. Multigroup path analysis was used for testing the effect of increase in reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge on reading comprehension. We found reciprocal teaching had a positive effect on reading comprehension, especially for students with learning difficulties. Reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge improved significantly, but similarly in both the intervention and control groups. However, the increase in metacognitive knowledge only contributed to reading comprehension in the intervention group, not in the control group. The study sheds light on the cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms underlying students’ reading comprehension process, emphasizing metacognitive knowledge and especially the systematic practice of reading strategies as key factors in improving reading comprehension.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103/fullreading fluencyreading strategiesreading comprehensionreciprocal teachinglearning difficulties
spellingShingle Maris Juhkam
Anna-Liisa Jõgi
Piret Soodla
Mikko Aro
Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
Frontiers in Psychology
reading fluency
reading strategies
reading comprehension
reciprocal teaching
learning difficulties
title Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
title_full Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
title_fullStr Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
title_full_unstemmed Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
title_short Development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching: do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension?
title_sort development of reading fluency and metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies during reciprocal teaching do these changes actually contribute to reading comprehension
topic reading fluency
reading strategies
reading comprehension
reciprocal teaching
learning difficulties
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191103/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marisjuhkam developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension
AT annaliisajogi developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension
AT piretsoodla developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension
AT mikkoaro developmentofreadingfluencyandmetacognitiveknowledgeofreadingstrategiesduringreciprocalteachingdothesechangesactuallycontributetoreadingcomprehension