Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial

Introduction: Various non-operative treatment modalities have been advocated for a frozen shoulder. In the present study we compared the efficacy of single intra-articular steroid injection vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroids for frozen shoulder (FS) in the frozen phase. Materials and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swaroop S, Gupta P, Patnaik S, Reddy SS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2023-03-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://morthoj.org/2023/v17n1/steroids-frozen-shoulder.pdf
_version_ 1827939571579486208
author Swaroop S
Gupta P
Patnaik S
Reddy SS
author_facet Swaroop S
Gupta P
Patnaik S
Reddy SS
author_sort Swaroop S
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Various non-operative treatment modalities have been advocated for a frozen shoulder. In the present study we compared the efficacy of single intra-articular steroid injection vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroids for frozen shoulder (FS) in the frozen phase. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomised control trial (RCT) done at a tertiary care centre. A total of 108 participants were randomised into two groups- one group received intra-articular steroid with hydrodilatation (HDS) and other group received intra- articular steroid injection only (S). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were taken, and statistical analysis was done to measure the outcome at two weeks, six weeks and three-month intervals after the injection. Result: There was significant improvement in symptoms at each interval for both the groups (p=0.0). There was no statistically significant difference in the SPADI score between the two groups at two weeks post injection, however at six weeks (p=0.04) and 3 months (p=0.001) significant difference in the SPADI score was demonstrated with better scores in group S. The mean duration of analgesia required in group HDS was 5.17 days (S.D.=1.73) and for group S was 4.28 days (S.D.=1.01), with a statistical significance (p=0.002). Conclusion: Better clinical results were obtained at six weeks and three months with the group receiving corticosteroid only and also had a lesser requirement of analgesia post-intervention. Thus, intra-articular steroid injection only seems to be a more desirable method of management during the frozen phase of FS than that of hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroid injection.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:56:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91c5970b1bd24f94b4e3f9504be8505c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:56:36Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format Article
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
spelling doaj.art-91c5970b1bd24f94b4e3f9504be8505c2023-05-29T02:23:35ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2023-03-01171343910.5704/MOJ.2303.005Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control TrialSwaroop S0Gupta P1Patnaik S2Reddy SS3Department of Orthopaedics, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IndiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Bromwich, United KingdomDepartment of Orthopaedics, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IndiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IndiaIntroduction: Various non-operative treatment modalities have been advocated for a frozen shoulder. In the present study we compared the efficacy of single intra-articular steroid injection vs hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroids for frozen shoulder (FS) in the frozen phase. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomised control trial (RCT) done at a tertiary care centre. A total of 108 participants were randomised into two groups- one group received intra-articular steroid with hydrodilatation (HDS) and other group received intra- articular steroid injection only (S). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were taken, and statistical analysis was done to measure the outcome at two weeks, six weeks and three-month intervals after the injection. Result: There was significant improvement in symptoms at each interval for both the groups (p=0.0). There was no statistically significant difference in the SPADI score between the two groups at two weeks post injection, however at six weeks (p=0.04) and 3 months (p=0.001) significant difference in the SPADI score was demonstrated with better scores in group S. The mean duration of analgesia required in group HDS was 5.17 days (S.D.=1.73) and for group S was 4.28 days (S.D.=1.01), with a statistical significance (p=0.002). Conclusion: Better clinical results were obtained at six weeks and three months with the group receiving corticosteroid only and also had a lesser requirement of analgesia post-intervention. Thus, intra-articular steroid injection only seems to be a more desirable method of management during the frozen phase of FS than that of hydrodilatation with intra-articular steroid injection.http://morthoj.org/2023/v17n1/steroids-frozen-shoulder.pdffrozen shoulderhydrodilatation shoulderintra-articular steroidsadhesive capsulitis
spellingShingle Swaroop S
Gupta P
Patnaik S
Reddy SS
Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
frozen shoulder
hydrodilatation shoulder
intra-articular steroids
adhesive capsulitis
title Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
title_full Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
title_fullStr Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
title_short Intra-articular Steroid alone vs Hydrodilatation with intra- articular Steroid in Frozen Shoulder - A Randomised Control Trial
title_sort intra articular steroid alone vs hydrodilatation with intra articular steroid in frozen shoulder a randomised control trial
topic frozen shoulder
hydrodilatation shoulder
intra-articular steroids
adhesive capsulitis
url http://morthoj.org/2023/v17n1/steroids-frozen-shoulder.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT swaroops intraarticularsteroidalonevshydrodilatationwithintraarticularsteroidinfrozenshoulderarandomisedcontroltrial
AT guptap intraarticularsteroidalonevshydrodilatationwithintraarticularsteroidinfrozenshoulderarandomisedcontroltrial
AT patnaiks intraarticularsteroidalonevshydrodilatationwithintraarticularsteroidinfrozenshoulderarandomisedcontroltrial
AT reddyss intraarticularsteroidalonevshydrodilatationwithintraarticularsteroidinfrozenshoulderarandomisedcontroltrial