Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection

Abstract Instrumental techniques are preferred over bioassay methods for antibiotic quantification mainly due to speed and ability to quantify metabolites in biological samples; however, the potency and biological activity of these drugs cannot be assessed. Two methods - agar well diffusion (bio-ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edebi Nicholas Vaikosen, Samuel Ogheneruona Origbo, Diepreye Ere, Prosper Odaderia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2023-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100872&tlng=en
_version_ 1797957107787497472
author Edebi Nicholas Vaikosen
Samuel Ogheneruona Origbo
Diepreye Ere
Prosper Odaderia
author_facet Edebi Nicholas Vaikosen
Samuel Ogheneruona Origbo
Diepreye Ere
Prosper Odaderia
author_sort Edebi Nicholas Vaikosen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Instrumental techniques are preferred over bioassay methods for antibiotic quantification mainly due to speed and ability to quantify metabolites in biological samples; however, the potency and biological activity of these drugs cannot be assessed. Two methods - agar well diffusion (bio-assay) and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate amikacin sulfate injection. Agar plates were inoculated with S. aureus inoculum; zones of inhibition from its susceptibility to amikacin were obtained, while spectrophotometric absorption at 650 nm of ninhydrin- derivatized amikacin in phosphate buffer (pH 8) was measured. Methods performance showed linearity from 1 - 16 μgmL-1 (bioassay, r = 0.9994) and 10-50 μgmL-1 (spectrophotometric, r = 0.9998). Molar absorptivity was 2.595 x 104 Lmol-1cm-1. Limits of detection and quantification were 1.07 and 3.24 μgmL-1 respectively for bioassay method, while corresponding values for spectrophotometric method were 0.98 and 2.97 μg mL-1. Relative standard deviations were ≤ 2.0% for both methods, with recoveries from 95.93 - 100.25%. Amikacin in brands ranged from 97.53 ± 2.68 to 100.84 ± 1.82%, student’s t-test was ≤ 2.78 (n = 4) with respect to label claim for both methods. Experimental paired t-test (t = 2.07; n = 4) and F-test (F = 3.94; n = 4) values indicated no significant difference between both methods, hence comparable and can jointly be used in quality control assessment of antibiotics.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:59:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91c9b45abc464af4b1cd2647b5fcd926
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2175-9790
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:59:06Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-91c9b45abc464af4b1cd2647b5fcd9262023-01-10T07:35:50ZengUniversidade de São PauloBrazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences2175-97902023-01-015810.1590/s2175-97902022e201185Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injectionEdebi Nicholas Vaikosenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-6127Samuel Ogheneruona OrigboDiepreye EreProsper OdaderiaAbstract Instrumental techniques are preferred over bioassay methods for antibiotic quantification mainly due to speed and ability to quantify metabolites in biological samples; however, the potency and biological activity of these drugs cannot be assessed. Two methods - agar well diffusion (bio-assay) and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate amikacin sulfate injection. Agar plates were inoculated with S. aureus inoculum; zones of inhibition from its susceptibility to amikacin were obtained, while spectrophotometric absorption at 650 nm of ninhydrin- derivatized amikacin in phosphate buffer (pH 8) was measured. Methods performance showed linearity from 1 - 16 μgmL-1 (bioassay, r = 0.9994) and 10-50 μgmL-1 (spectrophotometric, r = 0.9998). Molar absorptivity was 2.595 x 104 Lmol-1cm-1. Limits of detection and quantification were 1.07 and 3.24 μgmL-1 respectively for bioassay method, while corresponding values for spectrophotometric method were 0.98 and 2.97 μg mL-1. Relative standard deviations were ≤ 2.0% for both methods, with recoveries from 95.93 - 100.25%. Amikacin in brands ranged from 97.53 ± 2.68 to 100.84 ± 1.82%, student’s t-test was ≤ 2.78 (n = 4) with respect to label claim for both methods. Experimental paired t-test (t = 2.07; n = 4) and F-test (F = 3.94; n = 4) values indicated no significant difference between both methods, hence comparable and can jointly be used in quality control assessment of antibiotics.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100872&tlng=enBiological activityPotencyDerivatizatonAminoglycosidesMolar absorptivityNinhydrin
spellingShingle Edebi Nicholas Vaikosen
Samuel Ogheneruona Origbo
Diepreye Ere
Prosper Odaderia
Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Biological activity
Potency
Derivatizaton
Aminoglycosides
Molar absorptivity
Ninhydrin
title Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
title_full Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
title_fullStr Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
title_full_unstemmed Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
title_short Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
title_sort comparative application of biological and ninhydrin derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection
topic Biological activity
Potency
Derivatizaton
Aminoglycosides
Molar absorptivity
Ninhydrin
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-82502022000100872&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT edebinicholasvaikosen comparativeapplicationofbiologicalandninhydrinderivatizedspectrophotometricassaysintheevaluationandvalidationofamikacinsulfateinjection
AT samuelogheneruonaorigbo comparativeapplicationofbiologicalandninhydrinderivatizedspectrophotometricassaysintheevaluationandvalidationofamikacinsulfateinjection
AT diepreyeere comparativeapplicationofbiologicalandninhydrinderivatizedspectrophotometricassaysintheevaluationandvalidationofamikacinsulfateinjection
AT prosperodaderia comparativeapplicationofbiologicalandninhydrinderivatizedspectrophotometricassaysintheevaluationandvalidationofamikacinsulfateinjection