Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures
<i>Background and objectives:</i> In this study, the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) was compared to radiography (XR) in the diagnosis of fractures, the determination of characteristics of the fractures, and treatment selection of fractures in patients admitted to the e...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
| Series: | Medicina |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/7/355 |
| _version_ | 1797707206635814912 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Avci Nalan Kozaci Gul Tulubas Gulsum Caliskan Aysegul Yuksel Adeviye Karaca Fatih Doganay Ibrahim Etli |
| author_facet | Mustafa Avci Nalan Kozaci Gul Tulubas Gulsum Caliskan Aysegul Yuksel Adeviye Karaca Fatih Doganay Ibrahim Etli |
| author_sort | Mustafa Avci |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <i>Background and objectives:</i> In this study, the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) was compared to radiography (XR) in the diagnosis of fractures, the determination of characteristics of the fractures, and treatment selection of fractures in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) due to trauma and suspected long bone (LB) fractures. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The patients were included in the study, who were admitted to ED due to trauma, and had physical examination findings suggesting the presence of fractures in LB (humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, and fibula). The patients were evaluated by two emergency physicians (EP) in ED. The first EP examined LBs with POCUS and the second EP examined them with XR. LBs were evaluated on the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral surfaces and from the proximal joint to the distal one (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle joint) in both longitudinal and transverse axes with POCUS. <i>Results:</i> A total of 205 patients with suspected LB fractures were included in the study. LB fractures were determined in 99 patients with XR and in 105 patients with POCUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of POCUS in determining the fractures were 99%, 93%, 93%, and 99%, respectively, compared to XR. Compared to XR, POCUS was able to determine 100% of fissure type fractures (kappa (κ) value: 0.765), 83% of linear fractures (κ: 0.848), 92% of fragmented fractures(κ: 0.756), 67% of spiral fractures (κ:0.798), 75% of avulsion type fractures (κ: 0.855), and 100% of full separation type fractures (κ: 0.855). <i>Conclusions:</i> This study has demonstrated that POCUS has a high sensitivity in diagnosing LB fractures. POCUS has a high sensitivity in identifying fracture characteristics. POCUS can be used as an alternative imaging method to XR in the diagnosis of LB fractures and in the determination of fracture characteristics. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T06:02:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-91cf40f4b8f6488e8d6c963fe3e28cf9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1010-660X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T06:02:58Z |
| publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medicina |
| spelling | doaj.art-91cf40f4b8f6488e8d6c963fe3e28cf92023-09-03T03:58:15ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2019-07-0155735510.3390/medicina55070355medicina55070355Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone FracturesMustafa Avci0Nalan Kozaci1Gul Tulubas2Gulsum Caliskan3Aysegul Yuksel4Adeviye Karaca5Fatih Doganay6Ibrahim Etli7Department of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ercis State Hospital, Van 65400, TurkeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Edremit State Hospital, Balikesir 10300, TurkeyDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya 07100, Turkey<i>Background and objectives:</i> In this study, the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) was compared to radiography (XR) in the diagnosis of fractures, the determination of characteristics of the fractures, and treatment selection of fractures in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) due to trauma and suspected long bone (LB) fractures. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> The patients were included in the study, who were admitted to ED due to trauma, and had physical examination findings suggesting the presence of fractures in LB (humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, and fibula). The patients were evaluated by two emergency physicians (EP) in ED. The first EP examined LBs with POCUS and the second EP examined them with XR. LBs were evaluated on the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral surfaces and from the proximal joint to the distal one (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle joint) in both longitudinal and transverse axes with POCUS. <i>Results:</i> A total of 205 patients with suspected LB fractures were included in the study. LB fractures were determined in 99 patients with XR and in 105 patients with POCUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of POCUS in determining the fractures were 99%, 93%, 93%, and 99%, respectively, compared to XR. Compared to XR, POCUS was able to determine 100% of fissure type fractures (kappa (κ) value: 0.765), 83% of linear fractures (κ: 0.848), 92% of fragmented fractures(κ: 0.756), 67% of spiral fractures (κ:0.798), 75% of avulsion type fractures (κ: 0.855), and 100% of full separation type fractures (κ: 0.855). <i>Conclusions:</i> This study has demonstrated that POCUS has a high sensitivity in diagnosing LB fractures. POCUS has a high sensitivity in identifying fracture characteristics. POCUS can be used as an alternative imaging method to XR in the diagnosis of LB fractures and in the determination of fracture characteristics.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/7/355bone ultrasonographydiagnosis of fracture with ultrasonographyfracture characteristicslong-bonepoint-of-care ultrasonographyPOCUStrauma ultrasonography |
| spellingShingle | Mustafa Avci Nalan Kozaci Gul Tulubas Gulsum Caliskan Aysegul Yuksel Adeviye Karaca Fatih Doganay Ibrahim Etli Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures Medicina bone ultrasonography diagnosis of fracture with ultrasonography fracture characteristics long-bone point-of-care ultrasonography POCUS trauma ultrasonography |
| title | Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures |
| title_full | Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures |
| title_short | Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Diagnosis of Long-Bone Fractures |
| title_sort | comparison of point of care ultrasonography and radiography in the diagnosis of long bone fractures |
| topic | bone ultrasonography diagnosis of fracture with ultrasonography fracture characteristics long-bone point-of-care ultrasonography POCUS trauma ultrasonography |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/7/355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafaavci comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT nalankozaci comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT gultulubas comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT gulsumcaliskan comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT aysegulyuksel comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT adeviyekaraca comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT fatihdoganay comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures AT ibrahimetli comparisonofpointofcareultrasonographyandradiographyinthediagnosisoflongbonefractures |