K čemu je kritika na světě?
My paper is concerned with the question how could we define art criticism? In my research I try to show that art criticism is hard to define gently enough to be able to differentiate within the amount of texts. Beside that I propose to see how was art criticism defined by different authors in the 19...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
Karolinum Press
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2020.10 |
_version_ | 1819277919126552576 |
---|---|
author | Anežka Bartlová |
author_facet | Anežka Bartlová |
author_sort | Anežka Bartlová |
collection | DOAJ |
description | My paper is concerned with the question how could we define art criticism? In my research I try to show that art criticism is hard to define gently enough to be able to differentiate within the amount of texts. Beside that I propose to see how was art criticism defined by different authors in the 1960s. Main three points defining critical text is relation to presence, speculative character and last but not least what I describe as engagement (political, social, cultural). These three
roots are undividable from each other yet still hardly thematise and very often overseen. Acknowledge all this together I assume, we should speak about art criticisms (in plural) instead of one type of writing which could be clearly defined. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-24T00:03:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-91e031bd6e824a9a913a12e29c5103d4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0567-8293 2464-7055 |
language | ces |
last_indexed | 2024-12-24T00:03:45Z |
publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
publisher | Karolinum Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica |
spelling | doaj.art-91e031bd6e824a9a913a12e29c5103d42022-12-21T17:25:03ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica0567-82932464-70552020-09-012019217718210.14712/24647055.2020.109853K čemu je kritika na světě?Anežka BartlováMy paper is concerned with the question how could we define art criticism? In my research I try to show that art criticism is hard to define gently enough to be able to differentiate within the amount of texts. Beside that I propose to see how was art criticism defined by different authors in the 1960s. Main three points defining critical text is relation to presence, speculative character and last but not least what I describe as engagement (political, social, cultural). These three roots are undividable from each other yet still hardly thematise and very often overseen. Acknowledge all this together I assume, we should speak about art criticisms (in plural) instead of one type of writing which could be clearly defined.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2020.10art criticismsdefinition of art criticismpresenceengagementspeculation1960s |
spellingShingle | Anežka Bartlová K čemu je kritika na světě? Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica art criticisms definition of art criticism presence engagement speculation 1960s |
title | K čemu je kritika na světě? |
title_full | K čemu je kritika na světě? |
title_fullStr | K čemu je kritika na světě? |
title_full_unstemmed | K čemu je kritika na světě? |
title_short | K čemu je kritika na světě? |
title_sort | k cemu je kritika na svete |
topic | art criticisms definition of art criticism presence engagement speculation 1960s |
url | http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2020.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anezkabartlova kcemujekritikanasvete |