Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother

Both ensemble filtering and variational data assimilation methods have proven useful in the joint estimation of state variables and parameters of geophysical models. Yet, their respective benefits and drawbacks in this task are distinct. An ensemble variational method, known as the iterative ensembl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Bocquet, P. Sakov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-10-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/20/803/2013/npg-20-803-2013.pdf
_version_ 1818648039017938944
author M. Bocquet
P. Sakov
author_facet M. Bocquet
P. Sakov
author_sort M. Bocquet
collection DOAJ
description Both ensemble filtering and variational data assimilation methods have proven useful in the joint estimation of state variables and parameters of geophysical models. Yet, their respective benefits and drawbacks in this task are distinct. An ensemble variational method, known as the iterative ensemble Kalman smoother (IEnKS) has recently been introduced. It is based on an adjoint model-free variational, but flow-dependent, scheme. As such, the IEnKS is a candidate tool for joint state and parameter estimation that may inherit the benefits from both the ensemble filtering and variational approaches. <br><br> In this study, an augmented state IEnKS is tested on its estimation of the forcing parameter of the Lorenz-95 model. Since joint state and parameter estimation is especially useful in applications where the forcings are uncertain but nevertheless determining, typically in atmospheric chemistry, the augmented state IEnKS is tested on a new low-order model that takes its meteorological part from the Lorenz-95 model, and its chemical part from the advection diffusion of a tracer. In these experiments, the IEnKS is compared to the ensemble Kalman filter, the ensemble Kalman smoother, and a 4D-Var, which are considered the methods of choice to solve these joint estimation problems. In this low-order model context, the IEnKS is shown to significantly outperform the other methods regardless of the length of the data assimilation window, and for present time analysis as well as retrospective analysis. Besides which, the performance of the IEnKS is even more striking on parameter estimation; getting close to the same performance with 4D-Var is likely to require both a long data assimilation window and a complex modeling of the background statistics.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:12:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91e290dc046342ada0f7a8f7c654fc90
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:12:05Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
spelling doaj.art-91e290dc046342ada0f7a8f7c654fc902022-12-21T22:09:07ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79462013-10-0120580381810.5194/npg-20-803-2013Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smootherM. BocquetP. SakovBoth ensemble filtering and variational data assimilation methods have proven useful in the joint estimation of state variables and parameters of geophysical models. Yet, their respective benefits and drawbacks in this task are distinct. An ensemble variational method, known as the iterative ensemble Kalman smoother (IEnKS) has recently been introduced. It is based on an adjoint model-free variational, but flow-dependent, scheme. As such, the IEnKS is a candidate tool for joint state and parameter estimation that may inherit the benefits from both the ensemble filtering and variational approaches. <br><br> In this study, an augmented state IEnKS is tested on its estimation of the forcing parameter of the Lorenz-95 model. Since joint state and parameter estimation is especially useful in applications where the forcings are uncertain but nevertheless determining, typically in atmospheric chemistry, the augmented state IEnKS is tested on a new low-order model that takes its meteorological part from the Lorenz-95 model, and its chemical part from the advection diffusion of a tracer. In these experiments, the IEnKS is compared to the ensemble Kalman filter, the ensemble Kalman smoother, and a 4D-Var, which are considered the methods of choice to solve these joint estimation problems. In this low-order model context, the IEnKS is shown to significantly outperform the other methods regardless of the length of the data assimilation window, and for present time analysis as well as retrospective analysis. Besides which, the performance of the IEnKS is even more striking on parameter estimation; getting close to the same performance with 4D-Var is likely to require both a long data assimilation window and a complex modeling of the background statistics.http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/20/803/2013/npg-20-803-2013.pdf
spellingShingle M. Bocquet
P. Sakov
Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
title Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
title_full Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
title_fullStr Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
title_full_unstemmed Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
title_short Joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble Kalman smoother
title_sort joint state and parameter estimation with an iterative ensemble kalman smoother
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/20/803/2013/npg-20-803-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mbocquet jointstateandparameterestimationwithaniterativeensemblekalmansmoother
AT psakov jointstateandparameterestimationwithaniterativeensemblekalmansmoother