Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy
Summary: Objective: To compare the difference in efficacy and accuracy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among robotic-arm system, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional TKA (COTKA). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 90 advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients in our hospital...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Asian Journal of Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422008922 |
_version_ | 1811173486452801536 |
---|---|
author | Rui He Maolin Sun Ran Xiong Junjun Yang Lin Guo Liu Yang |
author_facet | Rui He Maolin Sun Ran Xiong Junjun Yang Lin Guo Liu Yang |
author_sort | Rui He |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Summary: Objective: To compare the difference in efficacy and accuracy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among robotic-arm system, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional TKA (COTKA). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 90 advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients in our hospital between June 2019 and December 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into robotic arm-assisted (RA)TKA (group A), PSITKA (group B) and COTKA (group C), 30 cases in each group. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and length of hospital stay were counted. Imaging data of hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and sagittal tibial component angle (sTCA) were statistically analyzed. The postoperative recovery of the patients was evaluated by Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario Mac Master University Index Score (WOMAC). Results: Group A had the least intraoperative bleeding. For operation time, group A was the longest compared with group B and group C (P < 0.05), while group B was longer than group C (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in HKA, LDFA, and MPTA among the three groups, and the lower limb alignments were all restored to the neutral position. PCA of group A and B were both smaller than that of group C and closer to 0° (P < 0.05), but the difference between group A and B was not statistically significant. The sTCA in group A was significantly better than group B, and group B was significantly better than group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in function scores among the three groups. Conclusion: Compared to the PSI and CO, RA is more minimally invasive and more accurate in radiographic results. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:47:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-91f600fd53d14bb69ca70e804acff464 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1015-9584 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:47:44Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Asian Journal of Surgery |
spelling | doaj.art-91f600fd53d14bb69ca70e804acff4642023-02-03T04:55:56ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842023-02-01462742750Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracyRui He0Maolin Sun1Ran Xiong2Junjun Yang3Lin Guo4Liu Yang5Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaCorresponding author.; Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaCorresponding author.; Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, ChinaSummary: Objective: To compare the difference in efficacy and accuracy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among robotic-arm system, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional TKA (COTKA). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 90 advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients in our hospital between June 2019 and December 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into robotic arm-assisted (RA)TKA (group A), PSITKA (group B) and COTKA (group C), 30 cases in each group. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and length of hospital stay were counted. Imaging data of hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and sagittal tibial component angle (sTCA) were statistically analyzed. The postoperative recovery of the patients was evaluated by Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario Mac Master University Index Score (WOMAC). Results: Group A had the least intraoperative bleeding. For operation time, group A was the longest compared with group B and group C (P < 0.05), while group B was longer than group C (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in HKA, LDFA, and MPTA among the three groups, and the lower limb alignments were all restored to the neutral position. PCA of group A and B were both smaller than that of group C and closer to 0° (P < 0.05), but the difference between group A and B was not statistically significant. The sTCA in group A was significantly better than group B, and group B was significantly better than group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in function scores among the three groups. Conclusion: Compared to the PSI and CO, RA is more minimally invasive and more accurate in radiographic results.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422008922Robotic-armPatient-specific instrumentationTotal knee arthroplastyRotation alignmentAccuracy |
spellingShingle | Rui He Maolin Sun Ran Xiong Junjun Yang Lin Guo Liu Yang Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy Asian Journal of Surgery Robotic-arm Patient-specific instrumentation Total knee arthroplasty Rotation alignment Accuracy |
title | Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy |
title_full | Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy |
title_fullStr | Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy |
title_full_unstemmed | Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy |
title_short | Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy |
title_sort | semiactive robotic arm system versus patient specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty efficacy and accuracy |
topic | Robotic-arm Patient-specific instrumentation Total knee arthroplasty Rotation alignment Accuracy |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958422008922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruihe semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy AT maolinsun semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy AT ranxiong semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy AT junjunyang semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy AT linguo semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy AT liuyang semiactiveroboticarmsystemversuspatientspecificinstrumentationinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyefficacyandaccuracy |