Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study

Abstract Background Traditional prosthetic fabrication relies heavily on plaster casting and 3D models for the accurate production of prosthetics to allow patients to begin rehabilitation and participate in daily activities. Recent technological advancements allow for the use of 2D photographs to fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keaton J. Young, James E. Pierce, Jorge M. Zuniga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:3D Printing in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0044-0
_version_ 1818414952823652352
author Keaton J. Young
James E. Pierce
Jorge M. Zuniga
author_facet Keaton J. Young
James E. Pierce
Jorge M. Zuniga
author_sort Keaton J. Young
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Traditional prosthetic fabrication relies heavily on plaster casting and 3D models for the accurate production of prosthetics to allow patients to begin rehabilitation and participate in daily activities. Recent technological advancements allow for the use of 2D photographs to fabricate individualized prosthetics based on patient anthropometrics. Additive manufacturing (i.e. 3D printing) enhances the capability of prosthesis manufacturing by significantly increasing production speed and decreasing production cost. Existing literature has extensively described the validity of using computer-aided design and 3D printing for fabrication of upper limb prostheses. The present investigation provides a detailed description of the development of a patient specific body-powered 3D printed partial finger prosthesis and compares its qualitative and functional characteristics to a commercially available finger prosthesis. Case presentation A 72-year old white male with a partial finger amputation at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the left hand performed a simple gross motor task with two partial finger prostheses and completed two self-reported surveys (QUEST & OPUS). Remote fitting of the 3D printed partial finger began after receipt of 2D photographs of the patient’s affected and non-affected limbs. Prosthetic fitting when using 3D printable materials permitted the use of thermoforming around the patient’s residual limb, allowing for a comfortable but tight-fitting socket. Results of the investigation show improved performance in the Box and Block Test when using both prostheses (22 blocks per minute) as compared to when not using a prosthesis (18 blocks per minute). Both body-powered prostheses demonstrated slightly lower task-efficiency when compared to the non-affected limb (30 blocks per minute) for the gross motor task. Results of the QUEST and OPUS describe specific aspects of both prostheses that are highly relevant to quality of life and functional performance when using partial finger prostheses. Conclusion The use of 3D printing exhibits great potential for the fabrication of functional partial finger prostheses that improve function in amputees. In addition, 3D printing provides an alternative means for patients located in underdeveloped or low-income areas to procure a functional finger prosthesis.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:27:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-91fd424f63dc4cf8a95f84e96c2d576c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2365-6271
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:27:17Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series 3D Printing in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-91fd424f63dc4cf8a95f84e96c2d576c2022-12-21T23:03:27ZengBMC3D Printing in Medicine2365-62712019-05-01511810.1186/s41205-019-0044-0Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case studyKeaton J. Young0James E. Pierce1Jorge M. Zuniga2Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at OmahaDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at OmahaDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at OmahaAbstract Background Traditional prosthetic fabrication relies heavily on plaster casting and 3D models for the accurate production of prosthetics to allow patients to begin rehabilitation and participate in daily activities. Recent technological advancements allow for the use of 2D photographs to fabricate individualized prosthetics based on patient anthropometrics. Additive manufacturing (i.e. 3D printing) enhances the capability of prosthesis manufacturing by significantly increasing production speed and decreasing production cost. Existing literature has extensively described the validity of using computer-aided design and 3D printing for fabrication of upper limb prostheses. The present investigation provides a detailed description of the development of a patient specific body-powered 3D printed partial finger prosthesis and compares its qualitative and functional characteristics to a commercially available finger prosthesis. Case presentation A 72-year old white male with a partial finger amputation at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the left hand performed a simple gross motor task with two partial finger prostheses and completed two self-reported surveys (QUEST & OPUS). Remote fitting of the 3D printed partial finger began after receipt of 2D photographs of the patient’s affected and non-affected limbs. Prosthetic fitting when using 3D printable materials permitted the use of thermoforming around the patient’s residual limb, allowing for a comfortable but tight-fitting socket. Results of the investigation show improved performance in the Box and Block Test when using both prostheses (22 blocks per minute) as compared to when not using a prosthesis (18 blocks per minute). Both body-powered prostheses demonstrated slightly lower task-efficiency when compared to the non-affected limb (30 blocks per minute) for the gross motor task. Results of the QUEST and OPUS describe specific aspects of both prostheses that are highly relevant to quality of life and functional performance when using partial finger prostheses. Conclusion The use of 3D printing exhibits great potential for the fabrication of functional partial finger prostheses that improve function in amputees. In addition, 3D printing provides an alternative means for patients located in underdeveloped or low-income areas to procure a functional finger prosthesis.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0044-0Finger amputation3D printing3D prosthetic development3D printed prostheticAdditive manufacturingFused deposition modeling
spellingShingle Keaton J. Young
James E. Pierce
Jorge M. Zuniga
Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
3D Printing in Medicine
Finger amputation
3D printing
3D prosthetic development
3D printed prosthetic
Additive manufacturing
Fused deposition modeling
title Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
title_full Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
title_fullStr Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
title_short Assessment of body-powered 3D printed partial finger prostheses: a case study
title_sort assessment of body powered 3d printed partial finger prostheses a case study
topic Finger amputation
3D printing
3D prosthetic development
3D printed prosthetic
Additive manufacturing
Fused deposition modeling
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41205-019-0044-0
work_keys_str_mv AT keatonjyoung assessmentofbodypowered3dprintedpartialfingerprosthesesacasestudy
AT jamesepierce assessmentofbodypowered3dprintedpartialfingerprosthesesacasestudy
AT jorgemzuniga assessmentofbodypowered3dprintedpartialfingerprosthesesacasestudy