Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis.
Although organizational context is central to evidence-based practice, underdeveloped measurement hinders its assessment. The Alberta Context Tool, comprised of 59 items that tap 10 modifiable contextual concepts, was developed to address this gap. The purpose of this study to examine the reliabilit...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127405 |
_version_ | 1819108591626354688 |
---|---|
author | Janet E Squires Leslie Hayduk Alison M Hutchinson Ranjeeta Mallick Peter G Norton Greta G Cummings Carole A Estabrooks |
author_facet | Janet E Squires Leslie Hayduk Alison M Hutchinson Ranjeeta Mallick Peter G Norton Greta G Cummings Carole A Estabrooks |
author_sort | Janet E Squires |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Although organizational context is central to evidence-based practice, underdeveloped measurement hinders its assessment. The Alberta Context Tool, comprised of 59 items that tap 10 modifiable contextual concepts, was developed to address this gap. The purpose of this study to examine the reliability and validity of scores obtained when the Alberta Context Tool is completed by professional nurses across different healthcare settings. Five separate studies (N = 2361 nurses across different care settings) comprised the study sample. Reliability and validity were assessed. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.70 for 9/10 Alberta Context Tool concepts. Item-total correlations exceeded acceptable standards for 56/59 items. Confirmatory Factor Analyses coordinated acceptably with the Alberta Context Tool's proposed latent structure. The mean values for each Alberta Context Tool concept increased from low to high levels of research utilization(as hypothesized) further supporting its validity. This study provides robust evidence for reliability and validity of scores obtained with the Alberta Context Tool when administered to professional nurses. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:12:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-91ffe8127d2146daa4a04eb668d8a426 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:12:22Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-91ffe8127d2146daa4a04eb668d8a4262022-12-21T18:40:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012740510.1371/journal.pone.0127405Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis.Janet E SquiresLeslie HaydukAlison M HutchinsonRanjeeta MallickPeter G NortonGreta G CummingsCarole A EstabrooksAlthough organizational context is central to evidence-based practice, underdeveloped measurement hinders its assessment. The Alberta Context Tool, comprised of 59 items that tap 10 modifiable contextual concepts, was developed to address this gap. The purpose of this study to examine the reliability and validity of scores obtained when the Alberta Context Tool is completed by professional nurses across different healthcare settings. Five separate studies (N = 2361 nurses across different care settings) comprised the study sample. Reliability and validity were assessed. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.70 for 9/10 Alberta Context Tool concepts. Item-total correlations exceeded acceptable standards for 56/59 items. Confirmatory Factor Analyses coordinated acceptably with the Alberta Context Tool's proposed latent structure. The mean values for each Alberta Context Tool concept increased from low to high levels of research utilization(as hypothesized) further supporting its validity. This study provides robust evidence for reliability and validity of scores obtained with the Alberta Context Tool when administered to professional nurses.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127405 |
spellingShingle | Janet E Squires Leslie Hayduk Alison M Hutchinson Ranjeeta Mallick Peter G Norton Greta G Cummings Carole A Estabrooks Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. PLoS ONE |
title | Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis. |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the alberta context tool act with professional nurses findings from a multi study analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janetesquires reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT lesliehayduk reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT alisonmhutchinson reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT ranjeetamallick reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT petergnorton reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT gretagcummings reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis AT caroleaestabrooks reliabilityandvalidityofthealbertacontexttoolactwithprofessionalnursesfindingsfromamultistudyanalysis |