Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate

Background: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. Methods: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas F. Scott, Ray Su, Kuangnan Xiong, Arman Altincatal, Carmen Castrillo-Viguera, Maria L. Naylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420975916
_version_ 1818591310174486528
author Thomas F. Scott
Ray Su
Kuangnan Xiong
Arman Altincatal
Carmen Castrillo-Viguera
Maria L. Naylor
author_facet Thomas F. Scott
Ray Su
Kuangnan Xiong
Arman Altincatal
Carmen Castrillo-Viguera
Maria L. Naylor
author_sort Thomas F. Scott
collection DOAJ
description Background: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. Methods: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or GA 20 mg/ml once daily (QD) were compared by propensity score matching analysis using individual patient data from ADVANCE and CONFIRM phase III clinical trials. In addition, clinical outcomes at 1–3 years for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a Q2W or GA 40 mg/ml three times a week (TIW) were evaluated using a matching-adjusted comparison analysis of individual patient data from ADVANCE and the ADVANCE extension study, ATTAIN, and aggregate patient data from the phase III GALA and the GALA extension studies. Results: Propensity-score-matched peginterferon beta-1a patients ( n  = 336) had a significantly lower annualized relapse rate [ARR (0.204 versus 0.282); rate ratio = 0.724; p  = 0.045], a significantly lower probability of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (10.0% versus 14.6%; hazard ratio = 0.625; p  = 0.048), and a significantly higher rate of NEDA (20.3% versus 11.5%; p  = 0.047) compared with GA 20 mg/ml QD patients after 2 years of treatment. Matching-adjusted peginterferon beta-1a patients (effective n  = 276) demonstrated a similar ARR at 1 year (0.278 versus 0.318; p  = 0.375) and significantly lower ARR at 2 years (0.0901 versus 0.203; p  = 0.032) and 3 years (0.109 versus 0.209; p  = 0.047) compared with GA 40 mg/ml TIW patients ( n  = 834). Conclusion: Results from separate matching comparisons of phase III clinical trials and extension studies suggest that peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg Q2W may provide better clinical outcomes than GA (20 mg/ml QD or 40 mg/ml TIW).
first_indexed 2024-12-16T10:10:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-920ebc3cf83942ba9a92b1ba387c13f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-2864
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T10:10:24Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
spelling doaj.art-920ebc3cf83942ba9a92b1ba387c13f62022-12-21T22:35:35ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders1756-28642021-01-011410.1177/1756286420975916Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetateThomas F. ScottRay SuKuangnan XiongArman AltincatalCarmen Castrillo-VigueraMaria L. NaylorBackground: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. Methods: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or GA 20 mg/ml once daily (QD) were compared by propensity score matching analysis using individual patient data from ADVANCE and CONFIRM phase III clinical trials. In addition, clinical outcomes at 1–3 years for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a Q2W or GA 40 mg/ml three times a week (TIW) were evaluated using a matching-adjusted comparison analysis of individual patient data from ADVANCE and the ADVANCE extension study, ATTAIN, and aggregate patient data from the phase III GALA and the GALA extension studies. Results: Propensity-score-matched peginterferon beta-1a patients ( n  = 336) had a significantly lower annualized relapse rate [ARR (0.204 versus 0.282); rate ratio = 0.724; p  = 0.045], a significantly lower probability of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (10.0% versus 14.6%; hazard ratio = 0.625; p  = 0.048), and a significantly higher rate of NEDA (20.3% versus 11.5%; p  = 0.047) compared with GA 20 mg/ml QD patients after 2 years of treatment. Matching-adjusted peginterferon beta-1a patients (effective n  = 276) demonstrated a similar ARR at 1 year (0.278 versus 0.318; p  = 0.375) and significantly lower ARR at 2 years (0.0901 versus 0.203; p  = 0.032) and 3 years (0.109 versus 0.209; p  = 0.047) compared with GA 40 mg/ml TIW patients ( n  = 834). Conclusion: Results from separate matching comparisons of phase III clinical trials and extension studies suggest that peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg Q2W may provide better clinical outcomes than GA (20 mg/ml QD or 40 mg/ml TIW).https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420975916
spellingShingle Thomas F. Scott
Ray Su
Kuangnan Xiong
Arman Altincatal
Carmen Castrillo-Viguera
Maria L. Naylor
Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
title Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
title_full Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
title_fullStr Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
title_full_unstemmed Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
title_short Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate
title_sort matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta 1a than with glatiramer acetate
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420975916
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasfscott matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate
AT raysu matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate
AT kuangnanxiong matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate
AT armanaltincatal matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate
AT carmencastrilloviguera matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate
AT marialnaylor matchingcomparisonsoftherapeuticefficacysuggestbetterclinicaloutcomesforpatientstreatedwithpeginterferonbeta1athanwithglatirameracetate