224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: People experiencing homelessness vs. housed peers have higher rates of substance use disorders as well as increased emergency medical services (EMS) use. However, it is unknown if EMS administers naloxone at different rates to people experiencing homelessness. We address if patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiffany M. Abramson, Corey M. Abramson, Stephen Sanko, Marc Eckstein, Suzanne Wenzel, Elizabeth Burner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866123002959/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797840421377802240
author Tiffany M. Abramson
Corey M. Abramson
Stephen Sanko
Marc Eckstein
Suzanne Wenzel
Elizabeth Burner
author_facet Tiffany M. Abramson
Corey M. Abramson
Stephen Sanko
Marc Eckstein
Suzanne Wenzel
Elizabeth Burner
author_sort Tiffany M. Abramson
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: People experiencing homelessness vs. housed peers have higher rates of substance use disorders as well as increased emergency medical services (EMS) use. However, it is unknown if EMS administers naloxone at different rates to people experiencing homelessness. We address if patient housing status impacts naloxone administration by EMS providers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) for all 911-incidents attended by the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) during the study period, January to December 2018. Individuals who were medically assessed by the LAFD and who were administered naloxone by LAFD EMS were included. Exclusion criteria was incomplete ePCRs. The primary outcome was prevalence of EMS naloxone administration by housing status in the city of Los Angeles. We used descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model to examine differences in care. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Naloxone was administered in 2,438 of the 345,190 incidents that occurred during the study period. 608 (25%) incidents involved people experiencing homelessness. Top indications for naloxone administration were similar in both groups: overdose, altered consciousness and cardiac arrest. Of those who received naloxone, people experiencing homelessness were more likely to be male (82% v 67%) and younger (41 v 46 years). People experiencing homelessness were more likely to receive naloxone (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.9). People experiencing homelessness received naloxone at a rate of 44 times that of housed peers. A logistic regression model adjusting for gender, age, respiratory depression and transport status showed people experiencing homelessness remained more likely to receive naloxone (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0-2.5). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Emergency medical services are more likely to administer naloxone to people experiencing homelessness than housed peers. There is a need to identify bias and factors that impact prehospital care and patient outcomes of people experiencing homelessness. New care pathways for people confronting homelessness and opioid use disorders are needed.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:14:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9219cd203e2141e9a8bcb3287896fdf1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:14:50Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-9219cd203e2141e9a8bcb3287896fdf12023-04-24T05:55:57ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612023-04-017696910.1017/cts.2023.295224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional reviewTiffany M. Abramson0Corey M. Abramson1Stephen Sanko2Marc Eckstein3Suzanne Wenzel4Elizabeth Burner5Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, Divisions of Emergency Medical Services and ResearchUniversity of Arizona, Department of SociologyKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, Divisions of Emergency Medical Services and ResearchKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, Divisions of Emergency Medical Services and ResearchSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern CaliforniaKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Department of Emergency Medicine, Divisions of Emergency Medical Services and ResearchOBJECTIVES/GOALS: People experiencing homelessness vs. housed peers have higher rates of substance use disorders as well as increased emergency medical services (EMS) use. However, it is unknown if EMS administers naloxone at different rates to people experiencing homelessness. We address if patient housing status impacts naloxone administration by EMS providers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) for all 911-incidents attended by the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) during the study period, January to December 2018. Individuals who were medically assessed by the LAFD and who were administered naloxone by LAFD EMS were included. Exclusion criteria was incomplete ePCRs. The primary outcome was prevalence of EMS naloxone administration by housing status in the city of Los Angeles. We used descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model to examine differences in care. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Naloxone was administered in 2,438 of the 345,190 incidents that occurred during the study period. 608 (25%) incidents involved people experiencing homelessness. Top indications for naloxone administration were similar in both groups: overdose, altered consciousness and cardiac arrest. Of those who received naloxone, people experiencing homelessness were more likely to be male (82% v 67%) and younger (41 v 46 years). People experiencing homelessness were more likely to receive naloxone (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.9). People experiencing homelessness received naloxone at a rate of 44 times that of housed peers. A logistic regression model adjusting for gender, age, respiratory depression and transport status showed people experiencing homelessness remained more likely to receive naloxone (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0-2.5). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Emergency medical services are more likely to administer naloxone to people experiencing homelessness than housed peers. There is a need to identify bias and factors that impact prehospital care and patient outcomes of people experiencing homelessness. New care pathways for people confronting homelessness and opioid use disorders are needed.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866123002959/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Tiffany M. Abramson
Corey M. Abramson
Stephen Sanko
Marc Eckstein
Suzanne Wenzel
Elizabeth Burner
224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
title_full 224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
title_fullStr 224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
title_full_unstemmed 224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
title_short 224 The effect of housing status (homelessness vs. housed) on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services: A prehospital cross-sectional review
title_sort 224 the effect of housing status homelessness vs housed on naloxone administration among patients with opioid overdose assessed by emergency medical services a prehospital cross sectional review
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866123002959/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT tiffanymabramson 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview
AT coreymabramson 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview
AT stephensanko 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview
AT marceckstein 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview
AT suzannewenzel 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview
AT elizabethburner 224theeffectofhousingstatushomelessnessvshousedonnaloxoneadministrationamongpatientswithopioidoverdoseassessedbyemergencymedicalservicesaprehospitalcrosssectionalreview