A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy

Background: We compared outcomes of en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum with separate Hem-o-lok polymer clip ligation of the renal vessels during laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent LN for renal surgery from January 2009 to December 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gokhan Koc, Gokhan Rahmi Ekin, Batuhan Ergani, Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2021;volume=17;issue=2;spage=192;epage=196;aulast=
_version_ 1818663177601155072
author Gokhan Koc
Gokhan Rahmi Ekin
Batuhan Ergani
Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
author_facet Gokhan Koc
Gokhan Rahmi Ekin
Batuhan Ergani
Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
author_sort Gokhan Koc
collection DOAJ
description Background: We compared outcomes of en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum with separate Hem-o-lok polymer clip ligation of the renal vessels during laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent LN for renal surgery from January 2009 to December 2015 were collected. Operation time, estimated blood loss, device malfunction rate, open conversion rate, complications and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation were evaluated. Results: En bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation were performed in 64 and 66 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 106.8 ± 20.8 min (range: 70–165) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 112.5 ± 24.1 min (range: 70–180) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.147). The mean estimated blood loss was 141.4 ± 124.1 ml (range: 25–600) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 147.6 ± 112.4 ml (range: 25–450) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.767). The open conversion was required in 7/64 (10.9%) and 2/66 (3.0%) patients in the en bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation groups, respectively (P = 0.093). Stapler device malfunction occurred in 6 patients (9.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in overall complications (P = 0.726), minor (Grade 1–2) complications (P = 0.698) and major (Grade 3–5) complications (P = 0.716). No patient was diagnosed with AVF formation during overall median 33-month (interquartile range: 30, range: 24–96) follow-up. Conclusions: En bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum during nephrectomy is an effective and safe technique. Although there is no reported AVF formation with en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum, longer follow-up is necessary.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:12:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-921af73e4b6140bb899830a6df838933
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:12:42Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
spelling doaj.art-921af73e4b6140bb899830a6df8389332022-12-21T22:02:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212021-01-0117219219610.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomyGokhan KocGokhan Rahmi EkinBatuhan ErganiYusuf Ozlem IlbeyBackground: We compared outcomes of en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum with separate Hem-o-lok polymer clip ligation of the renal vessels during laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent LN for renal surgery from January 2009 to December 2015 were collected. Operation time, estimated blood loss, device malfunction rate, open conversion rate, complications and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation were evaluated. Results: En bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation were performed in 64 and 66 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 106.8 ± 20.8 min (range: 70–165) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 112.5 ± 24.1 min (range: 70–180) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.147). The mean estimated blood loss was 141.4 ± 124.1 ml (range: 25–600) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 147.6 ± 112.4 ml (range: 25–450) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.767). The open conversion was required in 7/64 (10.9%) and 2/66 (3.0%) patients in the en bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation groups, respectively (P = 0.093). Stapler device malfunction occurred in 6 patients (9.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in overall complications (P = 0.726), minor (Grade 1–2) complications (P = 0.698) and major (Grade 3–5) complications (P = 0.716). No patient was diagnosed with AVF formation during overall median 33-month (interquartile range: 30, range: 24–96) follow-up. Conclusions: En bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum during nephrectomy is an effective and safe technique. Although there is no reported AVF formation with en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum, longer follow-up is necessary.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2021;volume=17;issue=2;spage=192;epage=196;aulast=en blochem-o-lok cliplaparoscopic nephrectomymalfunctionstapler
spellingShingle Gokhan Koc
Gokhan Rahmi Ekin
Batuhan Ergani
Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
en bloc
hem-o-lok clip
laparoscopic nephrectomy
malfunction
stapler
title A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_full A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_fullStr A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_short A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
title_sort comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy
topic en bloc
hem-o-lok clip
laparoscopic nephrectomy
malfunction
stapler
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2021;volume=17;issue=2;spage=192;epage=196;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT gokhankoc acomparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT gokhanrahmiekin acomparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT batuhanergani acomparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT yusufozlemilbey acomparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT gokhankoc comparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT gokhanrahmiekin comparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT batuhanergani comparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy
AT yusufozlemilbey comparisonofrenalvascularcontroltechniquesduringlaparoscopicnephrectomy