Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy

Background: To determine the changing indications and risk factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy (PH), comparing the present times with the nineteen eighties. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Unit-II) at Holy Family Hospital,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rubina Ashraf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2015-12-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/234
_version_ 1818533644866682880
author Rubina Ashraf
author_facet Rubina Ashraf
author_sort Rubina Ashraf
collection DOAJ
description Background: To determine the changing indications and risk factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy (PH), comparing the present times with the nineteen eighties. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Unit-II) at Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi. Data of patients undergoing PH over a five-year period in the nineteen eighties, extending from June 1984 to May 1989 was collected. All ladies delivered during this period constituted Group A. The clinical record of all patients undergoing peripartum hysterectomy in the recent five-year period from January 2010 to December 2014 was examined to determine the indications and risk factors which necessitated this surgery. All women delivered in this time period constituted Group B. Peripartum Hysterectomy was defined as hysterectomy performed at the time of delivery or within the immediate postpartum period of 48 hours. All women of more than 28 weeks of gestation undergoing peripartum hysterectomy were enrolled. Results: The total number of deliveries conducted in Group A (1984-89) was 7843. Total vaginal deliveries were 6795(86.6%), while 1048(13.4%) were Caesarean sections(CS). In Group B (2010-14) total deliveries were 45340. Vaginal births were 29948(66%) and Lower Segment Caesarean section was performed in 15392(34%). In Group A, ten women required peripartum hysterectomy with a rate of 1.3/1000 deliveries Five of these (50%) were done for uterine rupture. Four (40%) were done for postpartum haemorrhage. One was done for placenta previa without previous caesarean section. One hundred and thirty six patients in Group B underwent peripartum hysterectomy with a rate of 2.9/1000 deliveries. In this group fifty-six (41%) were for postpartum haemorrhage, and forty-one (30.2%) for morbidly adherent placenta praevia on previous C-section scar (MAPCS). Uterine rupture led to peripartum hysterectomy in twenty (14.7%) cases. Conclusions: Uterine rupture was previously the leading indication for peripartum hysterectomy, followed by postpartum haemorrhage. With a rise in caesarean section rate, placenta praevia on previous scar and postpartum haemorrhage are now the leading risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:01:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9222079002a141448cf2d354c2a8f432
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:01:27Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj.art-9222079002a141448cf2d354c2a8f4322022-12-22T00:55:53ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702015-12-01193Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum HysterectomyRubina Ashraf0Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holy Family Hospital and Rawalpindi Medical College, RawalpindiBackground: To determine the changing indications and risk factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy (PH), comparing the present times with the nineteen eighties. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Unit-II) at Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi. Data of patients undergoing PH over a five-year period in the nineteen eighties, extending from June 1984 to May 1989 was collected. All ladies delivered during this period constituted Group A. The clinical record of all patients undergoing peripartum hysterectomy in the recent five-year period from January 2010 to December 2014 was examined to determine the indications and risk factors which necessitated this surgery. All women delivered in this time period constituted Group B. Peripartum Hysterectomy was defined as hysterectomy performed at the time of delivery or within the immediate postpartum period of 48 hours. All women of more than 28 weeks of gestation undergoing peripartum hysterectomy were enrolled. Results: The total number of deliveries conducted in Group A (1984-89) was 7843. Total vaginal deliveries were 6795(86.6%), while 1048(13.4%) were Caesarean sections(CS). In Group B (2010-14) total deliveries were 45340. Vaginal births were 29948(66%) and Lower Segment Caesarean section was performed in 15392(34%). In Group A, ten women required peripartum hysterectomy with a rate of 1.3/1000 deliveries Five of these (50%) were done for uterine rupture. Four (40%) were done for postpartum haemorrhage. One was done for placenta previa without previous caesarean section. One hundred and thirty six patients in Group B underwent peripartum hysterectomy with a rate of 2.9/1000 deliveries. In this group fifty-six (41%) were for postpartum haemorrhage, and forty-one (30.2%) for morbidly adherent placenta praevia on previous C-section scar (MAPCS). Uterine rupture led to peripartum hysterectomy in twenty (14.7%) cases. Conclusions: Uterine rupture was previously the leading indication for peripartum hysterectomy, followed by postpartum haemorrhage. With a rise in caesarean section rate, placenta praevia on previous scar and postpartum haemorrhage are now the leading risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy.https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/234Peripartum hysterectomyCaesarean sectionPlacenta praeviaPostpartum Haemorrhage
spellingShingle Rubina Ashraf
Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Peripartum hysterectomy
Caesarean section
Placenta praevia
Postpartum Haemorrhage
title Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
title_full Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
title_fullStr Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
title_short Changing Indications and Risk Factors for Peripartum Hysterectomy
title_sort changing indications and risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy
topic Peripartum hysterectomy
Caesarean section
Placenta praevia
Postpartum Haemorrhage
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/234
work_keys_str_mv AT rubinaashraf changingindicationsandriskfactorsforperipartumhysterectomy