Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure

Abstract One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land‐applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa L. Wilson, Anthony Brusa, Hatley Christensen, Samuel Strack, Eddie Alto, Luis F. Allen, Scott D. Cortus, Chryseis Modderman, Roger L. Becker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Agricultural & Environmental Letters
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20065
_version_ 1811245792958087168
author Melissa L. Wilson
Anthony Brusa
Hatley Christensen
Samuel Strack
Eddie Alto
Luis F. Allen
Scott D. Cortus
Chryseis Modderman
Roger L. Becker
author_facet Melissa L. Wilson
Anthony Brusa
Hatley Christensen
Samuel Strack
Eddie Alto
Luis F. Allen
Scott D. Cortus
Chryseis Modderman
Roger L. Becker
author_sort Melissa L. Wilson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land‐applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are time consuming and often inconclusive. Although new genetic seed testing is making detection easier, methods to separate seed from contaminated manure are needed. Six methods were compared for their ability to recover 100 Palmer amaranth seeds added to bedded or nonbedded cattle manure: dry sieving, rinse sieving, manure saturation sieving without blending and with blending, and dispersion sieving without blending and with blending. Seed recovery was highest (>90%) with the rinse sieving method regardless of manure type. The dispersion methods are not recommended as they recovered <24.7% of seeds. Following each method, genetic testing successfully identified Palmer amaranth presence, indicating no interference of recovery method with DNA extraction.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:44:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92314a90ba564a2a8c321879d2986473
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2471-9625
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:44:28Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agricultural & Environmental Letters
spelling doaj.art-92314a90ba564a2a8c321879d29864732022-12-22T03:28:42ZengWileyAgricultural & Environmental Letters2471-96252022-01-0171n/an/a10.1002/ael2.20065Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manureMelissa L. Wilson0Anthony Brusa1Hatley Christensen2Samuel Strack3Eddie Alto4Luis F. Allen5Scott D. Cortus6Chryseis Modderman7Roger L. Becker8Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Soil, Water, and Climate Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center Univ. of Minnesota Extension 46352 MN‐329 Morris MN 56267 USADep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics Univ. of Minnesota 1991 Upper Buford Circle Saint Paul MN 55108 USAAbstract One pathway by which Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) invades new areas is through importation of contaminated livestock feed, which then contaminates land‐applied manure. If contaminated feed is suspected, detection tools are needed to test manure, but traditional methods are time consuming and often inconclusive. Although new genetic seed testing is making detection easier, methods to separate seed from contaminated manure are needed. Six methods were compared for their ability to recover 100 Palmer amaranth seeds added to bedded or nonbedded cattle manure: dry sieving, rinse sieving, manure saturation sieving without blending and with blending, and dispersion sieving without blending and with blending. Seed recovery was highest (>90%) with the rinse sieving method regardless of manure type. The dispersion methods are not recommended as they recovered <24.7% of seeds. Following each method, genetic testing successfully identified Palmer amaranth presence, indicating no interference of recovery method with DNA extraction.https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20065
spellingShingle Melissa L. Wilson
Anthony Brusa
Hatley Christensen
Samuel Strack
Eddie Alto
Luis F. Allen
Scott D. Cortus
Chryseis Modderman
Roger L. Becker
Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
title Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
title_full Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
title_fullStr Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
title_short Comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
title_sort comparison of methods to recover amaranth weed seeds from manure
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20065
work_keys_str_mv AT melissalwilson comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT anthonybrusa comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT hatleychristensen comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT samuelstrack comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT eddiealto comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT luisfallen comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT scottdcortus comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT chryseismodderman comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure
AT rogerlbecker comparisonofmethodstorecoveramaranthweedseedsfrommanure