Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation

Globalization is the defining historical process of our times, conditioning, if not determining, outcomes across vast swathes of human activity. At the same time, a heteropolar world is emerging, one in which various and competing sources of power and influence are based more on difference than on s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daryl Copeland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2013-08-01
Series:The School of Public Policy Publications
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42829
_version_ 1797843929955041280
author Daryl Copeland
author_facet Daryl Copeland
author_sort Daryl Copeland
collection DOAJ
description Globalization is the defining historical process of our times, conditioning, if not determining, outcomes across vast swathes of human activity. At the same time, a heteropolar world is emerging, one in which various and competing sources of power and influence are based more on difference than on similarity. In the face of these transformative forces, diplomacy is struggling to evolve. To date, none of the key elements of the diplomatic ecosystem – the foreign ministry, the Foreign Service, or the diplomatic business model – have adapted well, or quickly enough. If diplomacy is to achieve its full potential as a non-violent approach to the management of international relations and global issues through political communications, then radical reform will be required. These observations are particularly apt in Canada, where diplomatic performance has in recent years been troubled. The foreign ministry (formerly DFAIT), still struggling to absorb the deep cuts contained in the federal budget of March 2012, finds itself in the midst of a complicated merger with the aid agency (formerly CIDA). This unanticipated amalgamation has resulted in significant uncertainty and dislocation in both organizations, and is reminiscent of the disastrous split, and then re-integration, of the foreign and trade ministries 2004-06. Canadian public and digital diplomacy, widely considered to represent the leading edge of diplomatic practice, have been wound down as a result of the imposition of centralized control over all communications. The Foreign Service, for its part, remains locked in a protracted and acrimonious labour dispute over pay equity. Rotating strikes and working to rule have taken a toll on business and tourist arrivals, foreign student enrolment and high-level visits. In short, Canada’s diplomatic ecosystem is in a perilous state, and Canadian interests are suffering.In the age of globalization and heteropolarity, this won’t do.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:15:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-923c821b804244888cf3249d15917b46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2560-8312
2560-8320
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:15:14Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher University of Calgary
record_format Article
series The School of Public Policy Publications
spelling doaj.art-923c821b804244888cf3249d15917b462023-04-20T04:06:51ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202013-08-016Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of AdaptationDaryl Copeland0Guerrilla DiplomacyGlobalization is the defining historical process of our times, conditioning, if not determining, outcomes across vast swathes of human activity. At the same time, a heteropolar world is emerging, one in which various and competing sources of power and influence are based more on difference than on similarity. In the face of these transformative forces, diplomacy is struggling to evolve. To date, none of the key elements of the diplomatic ecosystem – the foreign ministry, the Foreign Service, or the diplomatic business model – have adapted well, or quickly enough. If diplomacy is to achieve its full potential as a non-violent approach to the management of international relations and global issues through political communications, then radical reform will be required. These observations are particularly apt in Canada, where diplomatic performance has in recent years been troubled. The foreign ministry (formerly DFAIT), still struggling to absorb the deep cuts contained in the federal budget of March 2012, finds itself in the midst of a complicated merger with the aid agency (formerly CIDA). This unanticipated amalgamation has resulted in significant uncertainty and dislocation in both organizations, and is reminiscent of the disastrous split, and then re-integration, of the foreign and trade ministries 2004-06. Canadian public and digital diplomacy, widely considered to represent the leading edge of diplomatic practice, have been wound down as a result of the imposition of centralized control over all communications. The Foreign Service, for its part, remains locked in a protracted and acrimonious labour dispute over pay equity. Rotating strikes and working to rule have taken a toll on business and tourist arrivals, foreign student enrolment and high-level visits. In short, Canada’s diplomatic ecosystem is in a perilous state, and Canadian interests are suffering.In the age of globalization and heteropolarity, this won’t do.https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42829
spellingShingle Daryl Copeland
Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
The School of Public Policy Publications
title Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
title_full Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
title_fullStr Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
title_short Diplomacy, Globalization and Heteropolarity: The Challenge of Adaptation
title_sort diplomacy globalization and heteropolarity the challenge of adaptation
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42829
work_keys_str_mv AT darylcopeland diplomacyglobalizationandheteropolaritythechallengeofadaptation