Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews

ObjectiveThe reliability of clinical evidence depends on high-quality meta-analyses/ systematic reviews (MAs/SRs). However, there has been no assessment of the quality of MAs/SRs for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), both nationally and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Linli Zhang, Shan Gao, Chengshuo Wang, Yuanyuan Li, Huateng Yuan, Longjun Cao, Chong Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1378731/full
_version_ 1797198727206666240
author Linli Zhang
Linli Zhang
Shan Gao
Chengshuo Wang
Chengshuo Wang
Yuanyuan Li
Huateng Yuan
Longjun Cao
Chong Gao
author_facet Linli Zhang
Linli Zhang
Shan Gao
Chengshuo Wang
Chengshuo Wang
Yuanyuan Li
Huateng Yuan
Longjun Cao
Chong Gao
author_sort Linli Zhang
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThe reliability of clinical evidence depends on high-quality meta-analyses/ systematic reviews (MAs/SRs). However, there has been no assessment of the quality of MAs/SRs for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), both nationally and internationally. This article seeks to use radar plotting to visually present the quality of MAs/SRs on rTMS for improving cognitive function in PSCI, aiming to offer an intuitive foundation for clinical research.MethodsEight Chinese or English databases were systematically searched to collect comprehensive literature, and the retrieval time ranged from inception to 26 March 2024. Literature ranking was calculated using six dimensions: publication year, design type, AMSTAR-2 score, PRISMA score, publication bias, and homogeneity. Finally, radar plots were drafted to present a multivariate literature evaluation. The GRADE tool assessed the strength of evidence for the outcome indicators included in the MAs/SRs.ResultsThe 17 articles included had average scores of 12.29, 17, 9.88, 9.71, 12.88, and 12.76 for each dimension. The radar plot showed that an article published in 2023 had the highest rank and a large radar plot area, while an article published in 2021 had the lowest rank and a small radar plot area. The GRADE tool evaluation revealed that 51 pieces of evidence were of very low quality, 67 were of low quality, 12 were of moderate quality, and only one was of high quality.ConclusionThe average rank score of literature ranged from 8.50 to 17, with higher rankings indicating greater significance in literature reference. Variations in literature quality were attributed to inadequate study planning, irregular literature search and screening, insufficient description of inclusion criteria for studies, and inadequate consideration of bias risk in the included studies. Most MAs/SRs indicated that rTMS was more effective than the control group in enhancing the global cognitive function and activities of daily living in PSCI patients. However, the overall quality of the literature was generally low and needs validation from future high-quality evidence.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023491280.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:04:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-924a93615cb34430806dfac668590353
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:04:27Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-924a93615cb34430806dfac6685903532024-04-22T04:35:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952024-04-011510.3389/fneur.2024.13787311378731Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviewsLinli Zhang0Linli Zhang1Shan Gao2Chengshuo Wang3Chengshuo Wang4Yuanyuan Li5Huateng Yuan6Longjun Cao7Chong Gao8Tianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Haibin People’s Hospital of Tianjin Binhai Newarea, Tianjin, China,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Haibin People’s Hospital of Tianjin Binhai Newarea, Tianjin, China,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China,Beijing Xiaotangshan Hospital, Beijing, ChinaTianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Haibin People’s Hospital of Tianjin Binhai Newarea, Tianjin, China,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Haibin People’s Hospital of Tianjin Binhai Newarea, Tianjin, China,ObjectiveThe reliability of clinical evidence depends on high-quality meta-analyses/ systematic reviews (MAs/SRs). However, there has been no assessment of the quality of MAs/SRs for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), both nationally and internationally. This article seeks to use radar plotting to visually present the quality of MAs/SRs on rTMS for improving cognitive function in PSCI, aiming to offer an intuitive foundation for clinical research.MethodsEight Chinese or English databases were systematically searched to collect comprehensive literature, and the retrieval time ranged from inception to 26 March 2024. Literature ranking was calculated using six dimensions: publication year, design type, AMSTAR-2 score, PRISMA score, publication bias, and homogeneity. Finally, radar plots were drafted to present a multivariate literature evaluation. The GRADE tool assessed the strength of evidence for the outcome indicators included in the MAs/SRs.ResultsThe 17 articles included had average scores of 12.29, 17, 9.88, 9.71, 12.88, and 12.76 for each dimension. The radar plot showed that an article published in 2023 had the highest rank and a large radar plot area, while an article published in 2021 had the lowest rank and a small radar plot area. The GRADE tool evaluation revealed that 51 pieces of evidence were of very low quality, 67 were of low quality, 12 were of moderate quality, and only one was of high quality.ConclusionThe average rank score of literature ranged from 8.50 to 17, with higher rankings indicating greater significance in literature reference. Variations in literature quality were attributed to inadequate study planning, irregular literature search and screening, insufficient description of inclusion criteria for studies, and inadequate consideration of bias risk in the included studies. Most MAs/SRs indicated that rTMS was more effective than the control group in enhancing the global cognitive function and activities of daily living in PSCI patients. However, the overall quality of the literature was generally low and needs validation from future high-quality evidence.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023491280.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1378731/fullpost-stroke cognitive impairmentstrokerepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationoverview of systematic reviewsradar plot
spellingShingle Linli Zhang
Linli Zhang
Shan Gao
Chengshuo Wang
Chengshuo Wang
Yuanyuan Li
Huateng Yuan
Longjun Cao
Chong Gao
Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
Frontiers in Neurology
post-stroke cognitive impairment
stroke
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
overview of systematic reviews
radar plot
title Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post stroke cognitive impairment an overview of systematic reviews
topic post-stroke cognitive impairment
stroke
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
overview of systematic reviews
radar plot
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1378731/full
work_keys_str_mv AT linlizhang efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT linlizhang efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT shangao efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT chengshuowang efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT chengshuowang efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT yuanyuanli efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT huatengyuan efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT longjuncao efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT chonggao efficacyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinpoststrokecognitiveimpairmentanoverviewofsystematicreviews