Biotechnology and Ethics:

What is the theological and ethical justification for the World Council of Churches' (WCC) participation in the global movement calling for a ban of transgenic technology in agriculture? The article identifies two phases in which the WCC took an active role in the debates concerning transgenic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hans Morten Haugen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage 2011-06-01
Series:Diaconia
Online Access:https://vr-elibrary.de/doi/10.13109/diac.2011.2.1.29
_version_ 1819083847609876480
author Hans Morten Haugen
author_facet Hans Morten Haugen
author_sort Hans Morten Haugen
collection DOAJ
description What is the theological and ethical justification for the World Council of Churches' (WCC) participation in the global movement calling for a ban of transgenic technology in agriculture? The article identifies two phases in which the WCC took an active role in the debates concerning transgenic technology. First, the decade leading up to the General Assembly in 1983, characterised by a vigilant role, by addressing the potentials and threats of new technologies before such technologies were actually brought to the market, including the patenting of plants. Second, the half decade before the General Assembly in 2006, characterised by a rejectionist role, by seeing the technology primarily in the context of corporate power. The article finds that the strong message is modified in the background documents that are presented to the 2006 General Assembly, and in statements that come out of conferences where the WCC is only one of many organisers. While the article confirms the ethical basis for challenging corporate conduct that constitutes a threat to the environment and to human rights, including the rights of indigenous peoples, it is argued that a more nuanced approach is warranted. This approach should emphasise that agricultural research must be adapted to the needs of small farmers, that the real risks of transgenic contamination must be adequately acknowledged, and that justice and stewardship must guide the WCC's approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:39:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-924eed6ade0044a69cc612dd528222d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-3261
2196-9027
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:39:04Z
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage
record_format Article
series Diaconia
spelling doaj.art-924eed6ade0044a69cc612dd528222d22022-12-21T18:51:01ZengVandenhoeck & Ruprecht VerlageDiaconia1869-32612196-90272011-06-0121294910.13109/diac.2011.2.1.29Biotechnology and Ethics:Hans Morten HaugenWhat is the theological and ethical justification for the World Council of Churches' (WCC) participation in the global movement calling for a ban of transgenic technology in agriculture? The article identifies two phases in which the WCC took an active role in the debates concerning transgenic technology. First, the decade leading up to the General Assembly in 1983, characterised by a vigilant role, by addressing the potentials and threats of new technologies before such technologies were actually brought to the market, including the patenting of plants. Second, the half decade before the General Assembly in 2006, characterised by a rejectionist role, by seeing the technology primarily in the context of corporate power. The article finds that the strong message is modified in the background documents that are presented to the 2006 General Assembly, and in statements that come out of conferences where the WCC is only one of many organisers. While the article confirms the ethical basis for challenging corporate conduct that constitutes a threat to the environment and to human rights, including the rights of indigenous peoples, it is argued that a more nuanced approach is warranted. This approach should emphasise that agricultural research must be adapted to the needs of small farmers, that the real risks of transgenic contamination must be adequately acknowledged, and that justice and stewardship must guide the WCC's approach.https://vr-elibrary.de/doi/10.13109/diac.2011.2.1.29
spellingShingle Hans Morten Haugen
Biotechnology and Ethics:
Diaconia
title Biotechnology and Ethics:
title_full Biotechnology and Ethics:
title_fullStr Biotechnology and Ethics:
title_full_unstemmed Biotechnology and Ethics:
title_short Biotechnology and Ethics:
title_sort biotechnology and ethics
url https://vr-elibrary.de/doi/10.13109/diac.2011.2.1.29
work_keys_str_mv AT hansmortenhaugen biotechnologyandethics