The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language

The aim of the study is to explore the iconic representation of frozen metaphor. Starting from the dichotomy between the pragmatic models, for which metaphor is a semantic anomaly, and the direct access models, where metaphor is seen as similar to literal language, the cognitive and linguistic proce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michela Balconi, Serafino Tutino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LED Edizioni Universitarie 2007-11-01
Series:Neuropsychological Trends
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ledonline.it/NeuropsychologicalTrends/allegati/NeuropsychologicalTrends_2_Balconi.pdf
_version_ 1811259915317018624
author Michela Balconi
Serafino Tutino
author_facet Michela Balconi
Serafino Tutino
author_sort Michela Balconi
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study is to explore the iconic representation of frozen metaphor. Starting from the dichotomy between the pragmatic models, for which metaphor is a semantic anomaly, and the direct access models, where metaphor is seen as similar to literal language, the cognitive and linguistic processes involved in metaphor comprehension are analyzed using behavioural data (RTs) and neuropsychological indexes (ERPs). 36 subjects listened to 160 sentences equally shared in the variables content (metaphorical vs literal) and congruousness (anomalous vs not semantically anomalous). The ERPs analysis showed two negative deflections (N3-N4 complex), that indicated different cognitive processes involved in sentence comprehension. Repeated measures ANOVA, applied to peak amplitude and latency variables, suggested in fact N4 as index of semantic anomaly (incongruous stimuli), more localized in posterior (Pz) area, while N3 was sensitive to the content variable: metaphor sentences had an ampler deflection than literal ones and posteriorly distributed (Oz). Adding this results with behavioral data (no differences for metaphor vs literal), it seems that the difference between metaphorical and literal decoding isn’t for the cognitive complexity of decoding (direct or indirect access), but for its representation format, which is more iconic for metaphor (as N3 suggests).
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:39:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92514baefcc2406ba965574620a3732f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1970-321X
1970-3201
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:39:50Z
publishDate 2007-11-01
publisher LED Edizioni Universitarie
record_format Article
series Neuropsychological Trends
spelling doaj.art-92514baefcc2406ba965574620a3732f2022-12-22T03:20:50ZengLED Edizioni UniversitarieNeuropsychological Trends1970-321X1970-32012007-11-0124161The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative languageMichela Balconi0Serafino Tutino1Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyThe aim of the study is to explore the iconic representation of frozen metaphor. Starting from the dichotomy between the pragmatic models, for which metaphor is a semantic anomaly, and the direct access models, where metaphor is seen as similar to literal language, the cognitive and linguistic processes involved in metaphor comprehension are analyzed using behavioural data (RTs) and neuropsychological indexes (ERPs). 36 subjects listened to 160 sentences equally shared in the variables content (metaphorical vs literal) and congruousness (anomalous vs not semantically anomalous). The ERPs analysis showed two negative deflections (N3-N4 complex), that indicated different cognitive processes involved in sentence comprehension. Repeated measures ANOVA, applied to peak amplitude and latency variables, suggested in fact N4 as index of semantic anomaly (incongruous stimuli), more localized in posterior (Pz) area, while N3 was sensitive to the content variable: metaphor sentences had an ampler deflection than literal ones and posteriorly distributed (Oz). Adding this results with behavioral data (no differences for metaphor vs literal), it seems that the difference between metaphorical and literal decoding isn’t for the cognitive complexity of decoding (direct or indirect access), but for its representation format, which is more iconic for metaphor (as N3 suggests).http://www.ledonline.it/NeuropsychologicalTrends/allegati/NeuropsychologicalTrends_2_Balconi.pdfMetaphorIconic RepresentationNeuropsychologyEEGEvent- related Potentials
spellingShingle Michela Balconi
Serafino Tutino
The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
Neuropsychological Trends
Metaphor
Iconic Representation
Neuropsychology
EEG
Event- related Potentials
title The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
title_full The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
title_fullStr The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
title_full_unstemmed The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
title_short The iconic representation of metaphor. An event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis of figurative language
title_sort iconic representation of metaphor an event related potentials erps analysis of figurative language
topic Metaphor
Iconic Representation
Neuropsychology
EEG
Event- related Potentials
url http://www.ledonline.it/NeuropsychologicalTrends/allegati/NeuropsychologicalTrends_2_Balconi.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT michelabalconi theiconicrepresentationofmetaphoraneventrelatedpotentialserpsanalysisoffigurativelanguage
AT serafinotutino theiconicrepresentationofmetaphoraneventrelatedpotentialserpsanalysisoffigurativelanguage
AT michelabalconi iconicrepresentationofmetaphoraneventrelatedpotentialserpsanalysisoffigurativelanguage
AT serafinotutino iconicrepresentationofmetaphoraneventrelatedpotentialserpsanalysisoffigurativelanguage