Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles
Energy piles are a novel form of ground heat exchanger (GHE) used in ground source heat pump systems. However, characterizing the pile and ground thermal properties is more challenging than for traditional GHEs. Routine in-situ thermal response testing (TRT) methods assume that steady state conditio...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2700 |
| _version_ | 1811186431181193216 |
|---|---|
| author | Linden Jensen-Page Fleur Loveridge Guillermo A. Narsilio |
| author_facet | Linden Jensen-Page Fleur Loveridge Guillermo A. Narsilio |
| author_sort | Linden Jensen-Page |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Energy piles are a novel form of ground heat exchanger (GHE) used in ground source heat pump systems. However, characterizing the pile and ground thermal properties is more challenging than for traditional GHEs. Routine in-situ thermal response testing (TRT) methods assume that steady state conditions in the GHE are achieved within a few hours, whereas larger diameter energy piles may take days or even weeks, thereby incurring significant costs. Previous work on pile TRTs has focused on small diameters up to 450 mm. This paper makes the first rigorous assessment of TRT methods for larger diameter piles using field and laboratory datasets, the application of numerical and analytical modelling, and detailed consideration of costs and program. Three-dimensional numerical simulation is shown to be effective for assessing the data gathered but is too computationally expensive for routine practice. Simpler fast run time steady state analytical models are shown to be a theoretically viable tool where sufficient duration test data is available. However, a new assessment of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in real field data shows how power fluctuations cause increased uncertainty in long duration tests. It is therefore recommended to apply transient models or instead to carry out faster and more cost-effective borehole in-situ tests for ground characterization with analytical approaches for pile characterization. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:46:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-925ba79e57a545c3af7517ee03f57247 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T13:46:20Z |
| publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj.art-925ba79e57a545c3af7517ee03f572472022-12-22T04:21:03ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-07-011214270010.3390/en12142700en12142700Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy PilesLinden Jensen-Page0Fleur Loveridge1Guillermo A. Narsilio2Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaEnergy piles are a novel form of ground heat exchanger (GHE) used in ground source heat pump systems. However, characterizing the pile and ground thermal properties is more challenging than for traditional GHEs. Routine in-situ thermal response testing (TRT) methods assume that steady state conditions in the GHE are achieved within a few hours, whereas larger diameter energy piles may take days or even weeks, thereby incurring significant costs. Previous work on pile TRTs has focused on small diameters up to 450 mm. This paper makes the first rigorous assessment of TRT methods for larger diameter piles using field and laboratory datasets, the application of numerical and analytical modelling, and detailed consideration of costs and program. Three-dimensional numerical simulation is shown to be effective for assessing the data gathered but is too computationally expensive for routine practice. Simpler fast run time steady state analytical models are shown to be a theoretically viable tool where sufficient duration test data is available. However, a new assessment of signal to noise ratio (SNR) in real field data shows how power fluctuations cause increased uncertainty in long duration tests. It is therefore recommended to apply transient models or instead to carry out faster and more cost-effective borehole in-situ tests for ground characterization with analytical approaches for pile characterization.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2700shallow geothermalground source heat pumpenergy pilesfoundationsthermal response testnumerical analysis |
| spellingShingle | Linden Jensen-Page Fleur Loveridge Guillermo A. Narsilio Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles Energies shallow geothermal ground source heat pump energy piles foundations thermal response test numerical analysis |
| title | Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles |
| title_full | Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles |
| title_fullStr | Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles |
| title_short | Thermal Response Testing of Large Diameter Energy Piles |
| title_sort | thermal response testing of large diameter energy piles |
| topic | shallow geothermal ground source heat pump energy piles foundations thermal response test numerical analysis |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2700 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lindenjensenpage thermalresponsetestingoflargediameterenergypiles AT fleurloveridge thermalresponsetestingoflargediameterenergypiles AT guillermoanarsilio thermalresponsetestingoflargediameterenergypiles |