Identifying trustworthy experts: how do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with?
This paper reports data from semi-structured interviews on how 26 Australian civil servants, ministers and ministerial advisors find and evaluate researchers with whom they wish to consult or collaborate. Policymakers valued researchers who had credibility across the three attributes seen as contrib...
Main Authors: | Abby S Haynes, Gemma E Derrick, Sally Redman, Wayne D Hall, James A Gillespie, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22403693/?tool=EBI |
Similar Items
-
The association between four citation metrics and peer rankings of research influence of Australian researchers in six fields of public health.
by: Gemma Elizabeth Derrick, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01) -
Policymakers’ experience of a capacity-building intervention designed to increase their use of research: a realist process evaluation
by: Abby Haynes, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Consultative review is worth the wait
by: Stuart RF King
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Towards Trustworthy Collaborative Editing
by: Mamdouh Babi, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process.
by: Hannah Fraser, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)