Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study
IntroductionThe condition of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) negatively affects the prognosis and life expectancy of the patients, posing a challenge to manage in clinical. This interventional study evaluated the efficacy as well as safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory LN.MethodsTwenty...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Immunology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133183/full |
_version_ | 1797868223676284928 |
---|---|
author | Shuo Zhang Shuo Zhang Yiran Chen Xin Chen Yan Zhao Xiaofeng Zeng Fengchun Zhang Li Wang Mengtao Li |
author_facet | Shuo Zhang Shuo Zhang Yiran Chen Xin Chen Yan Zhao Xiaofeng Zeng Fengchun Zhang Li Wang Mengtao Li |
author_sort | Shuo Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionThe condition of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) negatively affects the prognosis and life expectancy of the patients, posing a challenge to manage in clinical. This interventional study evaluated the efficacy as well as safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory LN.MethodsTwenty patients with refractory LN were enrolled in this study. A daily dose of 20–40 mg of leflunomide was given to the patients orally. Meanwhile, immunosuppressives were withdrawn, and corticosteroids were gradually tapered. There was an average follow-up period of 3, 6, and 12 months for most patients while some were observed for as long as 24 months. We recorded biochemical parameters and side effects. We calculated the response rate using intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsEighteen patients (90%) completed the study. At 3 months, 80% (16/20) of the patients achieved more than a 25% decrease in 24-hour urine protein quantity. At 6 months, three patients (15%) achieved a partial response, and five patients (25%) achieved a complete response. However, by 12 months and 24 months, the complete response rate dropped to 15% and 20%, respectively. The objective responses were 30% (6/20), 40% (8/20), 40% (8/20), and 30% (6/20) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Two patients withdrew from the study due to developing cytopenia and leucopenia.ConclusionIn patients diagnosed with refractory LN, our study shows that leflunomide could be a promising treatment option owing to its response rate and safety profile. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:52:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-92602f2312bc4199a04213c3707e9314 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-3224 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:52:40Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Immunology |
spelling | doaj.art-92602f2312bc4199a04213c3707e93142023-03-17T05:07:35ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242023-03-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.11331831133183Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective studyShuo Zhang0Shuo Zhang1Yiran Chen2Xin Chen3Yan Zhao4Xiaofeng Zeng5Fengchun Zhang6Li Wang7Mengtao Li8Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, ChinaIntroductionThe condition of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) negatively affects the prognosis and life expectancy of the patients, posing a challenge to manage in clinical. This interventional study evaluated the efficacy as well as safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory LN.MethodsTwenty patients with refractory LN were enrolled in this study. A daily dose of 20–40 mg of leflunomide was given to the patients orally. Meanwhile, immunosuppressives were withdrawn, and corticosteroids were gradually tapered. There was an average follow-up period of 3, 6, and 12 months for most patients while some were observed for as long as 24 months. We recorded biochemical parameters and side effects. We calculated the response rate using intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsEighteen patients (90%) completed the study. At 3 months, 80% (16/20) of the patients achieved more than a 25% decrease in 24-hour urine protein quantity. At 6 months, three patients (15%) achieved a partial response, and five patients (25%) achieved a complete response. However, by 12 months and 24 months, the complete response rate dropped to 15% and 20%, respectively. The objective responses were 30% (6/20), 40% (8/20), 40% (8/20), and 30% (6/20) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Two patients withdrew from the study due to developing cytopenia and leucopenia.ConclusionIn patients diagnosed with refractory LN, our study shows that leflunomide could be a promising treatment option owing to its response rate and safety profile.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133183/fullrefractory lupus nephritisleflunomideinduction therapydrug safetysystemic lupus erythematosus |
spellingShingle | Shuo Zhang Shuo Zhang Yiran Chen Xin Chen Yan Zhao Xiaofeng Zeng Fengchun Zhang Li Wang Mengtao Li Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study Frontiers in Immunology refractory lupus nephritis leflunomide induction therapy drug safety systemic lupus erythematosus |
title | Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study |
title_full | Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study |
title_fullStr | Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study |
title_short | Treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide: A prospective study |
title_sort | treatment of refractory lupus nephritis using leflunomide a prospective study |
topic | refractory lupus nephritis leflunomide induction therapy drug safety systemic lupus erythematosus |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133183/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shuozhang treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT shuozhang treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT yiranchen treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT xinchen treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT yanzhao treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT xiaofengzeng treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT fengchunzhang treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT liwang treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy AT mengtaoli treatmentofrefractorylupusnephritisusingleflunomideaprospectivestudy |