Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect

Conceptual alterations in the development of general language theory of nomination are considered in the article. They have defined the status of science-oriented cognitive nomination and the status of naïve-cognitive nomination. The mechanisms of functioning of cognitive-frame theory on the flora n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryabko Olga P.
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Publishing and Printing Center NOSU 2019-09-01
Series:Актуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики
Subjects:
Online Access:http://philjournal.ru/upload/2019-3/131-138.pdf
_version_ 1819171634769035264
author Ryabko Olga P.
author_facet Ryabko Olga P.
author_sort Ryabko Olga P.
collection DOAJ
description Conceptual alterations in the development of general language theory of nomination are considered in the article. They have defined the status of science-oriented cognitive nomination and the status of naïve-cognitive nomination. The mechanisms of functioning of cognitive-frame theory on the flora naming materials are classified in the article. Nominative frames of flora nomination participate more actively under the indirect meaning of flora objects through exocentric compounds. The indirect nomination gives the possibility to represent nominatively those facts, which are impossible to represent by direct meaning. In this case the nominator uses the transponation mechanism. The theory of non-obvious knowledge explains cognitive-frame essence of namings among nature’s objects. Cognitive-frame flora nomination is interpreted in the terms of prototype’s semantic theory, the theory of rema holding as “figure and ground”, the relevance/nonrelevance theory and also the theory of logical-semantic introduction. Extrapolation of these theories in the sphere of floranimic macrofield has given grounds to explain its heterogeneous nature. Microfield of parametric namings of plants is motivated by informative-ethic and emotional factors. From the volume of motivation-nominative qualities the one, which is called “form” of the plant, is the most numerous and is represented by indirect exocentric nomination. Microfield of pragmatic namings of plants is motivated by discourse-logical factors, the volume of indirect nomination has greatly descreased, exocentric nomination is not present wholly. The same situation is with the microfield of locative-temporal flora namings qualities.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T19:54:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9274d7dff072428590fc8be914c1f16d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-6021
2619-029X
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-22T19:54:25Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Publishing and Printing Center NOSU
record_format Article
series Актуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики
spelling doaj.art-9274d7dff072428590fc8be914c1f16d2022-12-21T18:14:27ZdeuPublishing and Printing Center NOSUАктуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики2079-60212619-029X2019-09-01313113810.29025/2079-6021-2019-3-131-138Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspectRyabko Olga P.0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-6307Southern Federal UniversityConceptual alterations in the development of general language theory of nomination are considered in the article. They have defined the status of science-oriented cognitive nomination and the status of naïve-cognitive nomination. The mechanisms of functioning of cognitive-frame theory on the flora naming materials are classified in the article. Nominative frames of flora nomination participate more actively under the indirect meaning of flora objects through exocentric compounds. The indirect nomination gives the possibility to represent nominatively those facts, which are impossible to represent by direct meaning. In this case the nominator uses the transponation mechanism. The theory of non-obvious knowledge explains cognitive-frame essence of namings among nature’s objects. Cognitive-frame flora nomination is interpreted in the terms of prototype’s semantic theory, the theory of rema holding as “figure and ground”, the relevance/nonrelevance theory and also the theory of logical-semantic introduction. Extrapolation of these theories in the sphere of floranimic macrofield has given grounds to explain its heterogeneous nature. Microfield of parametric namings of plants is motivated by informative-ethic and emotional factors. From the volume of motivation-nominative qualities the one, which is called “form” of the plant, is the most numerous and is represented by indirect exocentric nomination. Microfield of pragmatic namings of plants is motivated by discourse-logical factors, the volume of indirect nomination has greatly descreased, exocentric nomination is not present wholly. The same situation is with the microfield of locative-temporal flora namings qualities.http://philjournal.ru/upload/2019-3/131-138.pdfnominationtypes of nominationcognitive-frame approachflora namingsthe english language
spellingShingle Ryabko Olga P.
Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
Актуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики
nomination
types of nomination
cognitive-frame approach
flora namings
the english language
title Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
title_full Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
title_fullStr Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
title_full_unstemmed Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
title_short Indirect Nomination in flora naming’s system: cognitive aspect
title_sort indirect nomination in flora naming s system cognitive aspect
topic nomination
types of nomination
cognitive-frame approach
flora namings
the english language
url http://philjournal.ru/upload/2019-3/131-138.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ryabkoolgap indirectnominationinfloranamingssystemcognitiveaspect