Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience

Abstract A simplified 4‐strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow‐up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 02 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amaya Martínez‐Meñaca, Alejandro Cruz‐Utrilla, Víctor Manuel Mora‐Cuesta, Raquel Luna‐López, Teresa Segura‐de la Cal, Ángela Flox‐Camacho, Pilar Alonso‐Lecue, Pilar Escribano‐Subias, José Manuel Cifrián‐Martínez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12342
_version_ 1797236734061182976
author Amaya Martínez‐Meñaca
Alejandro Cruz‐Utrilla
Víctor Manuel Mora‐Cuesta
Raquel Luna‐López
Teresa Segura‐de la Cal
Ángela Flox‐Camacho
Pilar Alonso‐Lecue
Pilar Escribano‐Subias
José Manuel Cifrián‐Martínez
author_facet Amaya Martínez‐Meñaca
Alejandro Cruz‐Utrilla
Víctor Manuel Mora‐Cuesta
Raquel Luna‐López
Teresa Segura‐de la Cal
Ángela Flox‐Camacho
Pilar Alonso‐Lecue
Pilar Escribano‐Subias
José Manuel Cifrián‐Martínez
author_sort Amaya Martínez‐Meñaca
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A simplified 4‐strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow‐up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 02 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on risk stratification by this scale. We included 180 prevalent patients with PAH from two reference hospitals in Spain, followed up between 2006 and 2022. Patients were included if all the variables of interest were available within a 3‐month period on the Spanish Registry of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (REHAP): functional class (FC); NT‐proBNP; 6MWT; and CPET. The original 4‐strata model (NT‐proBNP, 6MWT, FC) identified most patients at low or intermediate‐low risk (36.7% and 51.1%, respectively). Notably, the modified scale (NT‐proBNP, CPET, FC) improved the identification of patients at intermediate‐high risk up to 18.9%, and at high risk up to 1.1% in comparison with the previous 12.2% and 0.0% in the original scale. This new model increased the number of patients correctly classified into higher‐risk strata (positive NRI of 0.06), as well as classified more patients without events in lower‐risk strata (negative NRI of 0.04). The proposed score showed a slightly superior prognostic capacity compared with the original model (Harrel's C‐index 0.717 vs. 0.709). Using O2 uptake instead of distance walked in the 6MWT improves the identification of high‐risk patients using the 4‐strata scale. This change could have relevant prognostic implications and lead to changes in the specific treatment of PAH.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:08:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92750aa284ba48e5af5a195e918c904c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8940
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:08:33Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pulmonary Circulation
spelling doaj.art-92750aa284ba48e5af5a195e918c904c2024-03-28T19:28:30ZengWileyPulmonary Circulation2045-89402024-01-01141n/an/a10.1002/pul2.12342Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experienceAmaya Martínez‐Meñaca0Alejandro Cruz‐Utrilla1Víctor Manuel Mora‐Cuesta2Raquel Luna‐López3Teresa Segura‐de la Cal4Ángela Flox‐Camacho5Pilar Alonso‐Lecue6Pilar Escribano‐Subias7José Manuel Cifrián‐Martínez8Respiratory Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Santander SpainCardiology Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid SpainRespiratory Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Santander SpainCardiology Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid SpainCardiology Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid SpainCardiology Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid SpainIDIVAL (Valdecilla Research Institute) Santander SpainCardiology Department, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre Madrid SpainRespiratory Department, ERN‐LUNG (European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases), Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL) Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Universidad de Cantabria Santander SpainAbstract A simplified 4‐strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow‐up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6‐min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 02 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on risk stratification by this scale. We included 180 prevalent patients with PAH from two reference hospitals in Spain, followed up between 2006 and 2022. Patients were included if all the variables of interest were available within a 3‐month period on the Spanish Registry of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (REHAP): functional class (FC); NT‐proBNP; 6MWT; and CPET. The original 4‐strata model (NT‐proBNP, 6MWT, FC) identified most patients at low or intermediate‐low risk (36.7% and 51.1%, respectively). Notably, the modified scale (NT‐proBNP, CPET, FC) improved the identification of patients at intermediate‐high risk up to 18.9%, and at high risk up to 1.1% in comparison with the previous 12.2% and 0.0% in the original scale. This new model increased the number of patients correctly classified into higher‐risk strata (positive NRI of 0.06), as well as classified more patients without events in lower‐risk strata (negative NRI of 0.04). The proposed score showed a slightly superior prognostic capacity compared with the original model (Harrel's C‐index 0.717 vs. 0.709). Using O2 uptake instead of distance walked in the 6MWT improves the identification of high‐risk patients using the 4‐strata scale. This change could have relevant prognostic implications and lead to changes in the specific treatment of PAH.https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12342cardiopulmonary exercise testpulmonary arterial hypertensionrisk assessment6 min walking test
spellingShingle Amaya Martínez‐Meñaca
Alejandro Cruz‐Utrilla
Víctor Manuel Mora‐Cuesta
Raquel Luna‐López
Teresa Segura‐de la Cal
Ángela Flox‐Camacho
Pilar Alonso‐Lecue
Pilar Escribano‐Subias
José Manuel Cifrián‐Martínez
Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
Pulmonary Circulation
cardiopulmonary exercise test
pulmonary arterial hypertension
risk assessment
6 min walking test
title Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
title_full Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
title_fullStr Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
title_full_unstemmed Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
title_short Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two‐center experience
title_sort simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test a spanish two center experience
topic cardiopulmonary exercise test
pulmonary arterial hypertension
risk assessment
6 min walking test
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12342
work_keys_str_mv AT amayamartinezmenaca simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT alejandrocruzutrilla simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT victormanuelmoracuesta simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT raquellunalopez simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT teresaseguradelacal simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT angelafloxcamacho simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT pilaralonsolecue simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT pilarescribanosubias simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience
AT josemanuelcifrianmartinez simplifiedriskstratificationbasedoncardiopulmonaryexercisetestaspanishtwocenterexperience