A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES

An improved understanding of lignocellulosic biomass availability is needed to support proposed expansion in biofuel production. Fifteen studies that estimate availability of lignocellulosic biomass quantities in in the U.S. and/or Canada are reviewed. Sources of differences in study methods and ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Magdalena Gronowska, Satish Joshi, Heather L. MacLean
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2009-02-01
Series:BioResources
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/viewFile/BioRes_04_1_%23%23%23%23_Gronowska_JM_Review_US_Can_Biomass_Supply/335
_version_ 1811294510740668416
author Magdalena Gronowska
Satish Joshi
Heather L. MacLean
author_facet Magdalena Gronowska
Satish Joshi
Heather L. MacLean
author_sort Magdalena Gronowska
collection DOAJ
description An improved understanding of lignocellulosic biomass availability is needed to support proposed expansion in biofuel production. Fifteen studies that estimate availability of lignocellulosic biomass quantities in in the U.S. and/or Canada are reviewed. Sources of differences in study methods and assumptions and resulting biomass quantities are elucidated. We differentiate between inventory studies, in which quantities of biomass potentially available are estimated without rigorous consideration of the costs of supply, versus economic studies, which take into consideration various opportunity costs and competition. The U.S. economic studies, which included reasonably comprehensive sets of biomass categories, estimate annual biomass availability to range from 6 million to 577 million dry metric tonnes (dry t), depending on offered price, while estimates from inventory studies range from 190 million to 3849 million dry t. The Canadian inventory studies, which included reasonably comprehensive sets of biomass categories, estimate availability to range from 64 million green t to 561 million dry t. The largest biomass categories for the U.S. are energy crops and agricultural residues, while for Canada they are expected to be energy crops and logging residues. The significant differences in study estimates are due in large part to the number of biomass categories included, whether economic considerations are incorporated, assump-tions about energy crop yields and land areas, and level of optimism of assumptions of the study.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:18:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-928a8255c6ed4e9d84169d908580d2bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2126
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:18:44Z
publishDate 2009-02-01
publisher North Carolina State University
record_format Article
series BioResources
spelling doaj.art-928a8255c6ed4e9d84169d908580d2bc2022-12-22T03:00:50ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262009-02-0141341369A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIESMagdalena GronowskaSatish JoshiHeather L. MacLeanAn improved understanding of lignocellulosic biomass availability is needed to support proposed expansion in biofuel production. Fifteen studies that estimate availability of lignocellulosic biomass quantities in in the U.S. and/or Canada are reviewed. Sources of differences in study methods and assumptions and resulting biomass quantities are elucidated. We differentiate between inventory studies, in which quantities of biomass potentially available are estimated without rigorous consideration of the costs of supply, versus economic studies, which take into consideration various opportunity costs and competition. The U.S. economic studies, which included reasonably comprehensive sets of biomass categories, estimate annual biomass availability to range from 6 million to 577 million dry metric tonnes (dry t), depending on offered price, while estimates from inventory studies range from 190 million to 3849 million dry t. The Canadian inventory studies, which included reasonably comprehensive sets of biomass categories, estimate availability to range from 64 million green t to 561 million dry t. The largest biomass categories for the U.S. are energy crops and agricultural residues, while for Canada they are expected to be energy crops and logging residues. The significant differences in study estimates are due in large part to the number of biomass categories included, whether economic considerations are incorporated, assump-tions about energy crop yields and land areas, and level of optimism of assumptions of the study.http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/viewFile/BioRes_04_1_%23%23%23%23_Gronowska_JM_Review_US_Can_Biomass_Supply/335Biomass supplyResource assessmentLignocellulosic biomass
spellingShingle Magdalena Gronowska
Satish Joshi
Heather L. MacLean
A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
BioResources
Biomass supply
Resource assessment
Lignocellulosic biomass
title A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
title_full A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
title_fullStr A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
title_full_unstemmed A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
title_short A REVIEW OF U.S. AND CANADIAN BIOMASS SUPPLY STUDIES
title_sort review of u s and canadian biomass supply studies
topic Biomass supply
Resource assessment
Lignocellulosic biomass
url http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/viewFile/BioRes_04_1_%23%23%23%23_Gronowska_JM_Review_US_Can_Biomass_Supply/335
work_keys_str_mv AT magdalenagronowska areviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies
AT satishjoshi areviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies
AT heatherlmaclean areviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies
AT magdalenagronowska reviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies
AT satishjoshi reviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies
AT heatherlmaclean reviewofusandcanadianbiomasssupplystudies