Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies

We previously showed that <i>L.</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> promastigotes and amastigotes of the PH8 strain generated larger lesions in mice than LV79, and that lesion-derived amastigotes from the two strains differ in their proteomes. We recently r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabia Tomie Tano, Erich Loza Telleria, Felipe Dutra Rêgo, Felipe Soares Coelho, Eloiza de Rezende, Rodrigo Pedro Soares, Yara Maria Traub-Cseko, Beatriz Simonsen Stolf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/2/173
_version_ 1797618894589919232
author Fabia Tomie Tano
Erich Loza Telleria
Felipe Dutra Rêgo
Felipe Soares Coelho
Eloiza de Rezende
Rodrigo Pedro Soares
Yara Maria Traub-Cseko
Beatriz Simonsen Stolf
author_facet Fabia Tomie Tano
Erich Loza Telleria
Felipe Dutra Rêgo
Felipe Soares Coelho
Eloiza de Rezende
Rodrigo Pedro Soares
Yara Maria Traub-Cseko
Beatriz Simonsen Stolf
author_sort Fabia Tomie Tano
collection DOAJ
description We previously showed that <i>L.</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> promastigotes and amastigotes of the PH8 strain generated larger lesions in mice than LV79, and that lesion-derived amastigotes from the two strains differ in their proteomes. We recently reported that PH8 promastigotes are more phagocytized by macrophages. Promastigotes’ membrane-enriched proteomes showed several differences, and samples of each strain clustered based on proteomes. In this paper, we show phenotypic differences between PH8 and LV79 promastigotes that may explain the higher virulence of PH8. We compared in vitro macrophage infections by day 4 (early) and day 6 (late stationary phase) cultures, resistance to complement, and LPG characteristics. PH8 promastigotes showed a higher infectivity and were more resistant to murine complement. LPG was different between the strains, which may influence the interaction with macrophages and survival to complement. We compared the infection of the permissive vector <i>Lutzomyia longipalpis</i>. PH8 was more abundant in the vector’s gut 72 h after feeding, which is a moment where blood digestion is finished and the parasites are exposed to the gut environment. Our results indicate that PH8 promastigotes are more infective, more resistant to complement, and infect the permissive vector more efficiently. These data suggest that PH8 is probably better adapted to the sand fly and more prone to survive in the vertebrate host.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:19:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9292815a50e54a76b395795efcb1b641
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:19:04Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-9292815a50e54a76b395795efcb1b6412023-11-16T22:33:02ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172023-01-0112217310.3390/pathogens12020173Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand FliesFabia Tomie Tano0Erich Loza Telleria1Felipe Dutra Rêgo2Felipe Soares Coelho3Eloiza de Rezende4Rodrigo Pedro Soares5Yara Maria Traub-Cseko6Beatriz Simonsen Stolf7Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, BrazilLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Parasitas e Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, BrazilBiotechnology Applied to Pathogens (BAP), Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Belo Horizonte 30000-000, MG, BrazilLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Parasitas e Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, BrazilDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, BrazilBiotechnology Applied to Pathogens (BAP), Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Belo Horizonte 30000-000, MG, BrazilLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Parasitas e Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, BrazilDepartment of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, BrazilWe previously showed that <i>L.</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> promastigotes and amastigotes of the PH8 strain generated larger lesions in mice than LV79, and that lesion-derived amastigotes from the two strains differ in their proteomes. We recently reported that PH8 promastigotes are more phagocytized by macrophages. Promastigotes’ membrane-enriched proteomes showed several differences, and samples of each strain clustered based on proteomes. In this paper, we show phenotypic differences between PH8 and LV79 promastigotes that may explain the higher virulence of PH8. We compared in vitro macrophage infections by day 4 (early) and day 6 (late stationary phase) cultures, resistance to complement, and LPG characteristics. PH8 promastigotes showed a higher infectivity and were more resistant to murine complement. LPG was different between the strains, which may influence the interaction with macrophages and survival to complement. We compared the infection of the permissive vector <i>Lutzomyia longipalpis</i>. PH8 was more abundant in the vector’s gut 72 h after feeding, which is a moment where blood digestion is finished and the parasites are exposed to the gut environment. Our results indicate that PH8 promastigotes are more infective, more resistant to complement, and infect the permissive vector more efficiently. These data suggest that PH8 is probably better adapted to the sand fly and more prone to survive in the vertebrate host.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/2/173<i>L.</i> (<i>L.</i>) <i>amazonensis</i>virulenceinfectioncomplementLPGsand fly
spellingShingle Fabia Tomie Tano
Erich Loza Telleria
Felipe Dutra Rêgo
Felipe Soares Coelho
Eloiza de Rezende
Rodrigo Pedro Soares
Yara Maria Traub-Cseko
Beatriz Simonsen Stolf
Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
Pathogens
<i>L.</i> (<i>L.</i>) <i>amazonensis</i>
virulence
infection
complement
LPG
sand fly
title Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
title_full Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
title_fullStr Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
title_short Phenotypical Differences between <i>Leishmania</i> (<i>Leishmania</i>) <i>amazonensis</i> PH8 and LV79 Strains May Impact Survival in Mammal Host and in Phlebotomine Sand Flies
title_sort phenotypical differences between i leishmania i i leishmania i i amazonensis i ph8 and lv79 strains may impact survival in mammal host and in phlebotomine sand flies
topic <i>L.</i> (<i>L.</i>) <i>amazonensis</i>
virulence
infection
complement
LPG
sand fly
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/2/173
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiatomietano phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT erichlozatelleria phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT felipedutrarego phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT felipesoarescoelho phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT eloizaderezende phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT rodrigopedrosoares phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT yaramariatraubcseko phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies
AT beatrizsimonsenstolf phenotypicaldifferencesbetweenileishmaniaiileishmaniaiiamazonensisiph8andlv79strainsmayimpactsurvivalinmammalhostandinphlebotominesandflies