hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?

Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain cell activity that results in seizures. It causes progressive damage to neurons. Epilepsy treatment currently focuses mostly on symptoms, which also have risks of unwanted side effects. There is currently no effective treatment to prevent epilep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sri Hastuti, Rinaldi Idroes, Imran Imran, Yetty Ramli, Abdul Hawil Abas, Trina Ekawati Tallei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Pharmaceuticals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/10/1247
_version_ 1797470472012562432
author Sri Hastuti
Rinaldi Idroes
Imran Imran
Yetty Ramli
Abdul Hawil Abas
Trina Ekawati Tallei
author_facet Sri Hastuti
Rinaldi Idroes
Imran Imran
Yetty Ramli
Abdul Hawil Abas
Trina Ekawati Tallei
author_sort Sri Hastuti
collection DOAJ
description Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain cell activity that results in seizures. It causes progressive damage to neurons. Epilepsy treatment currently focuses mostly on symptoms, which also have risks of unwanted side effects. There is currently no effective treatment to prevent epileptogenesis and the resulting neural damage. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell (hUMSC) and exosome therapy are examples of cellular therapies that may be used to treat degenerative diseases, such as epilepsy, or cell damage. However, there is still little research on the use of hUMSCs or hUMSC–exosomes for treating epilepsy. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to compare the potential and risk of hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes as therapies for epilepsy. This article provides a brief summary of hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes in multiple aspects, such as the isolation and purification method, the mechanism of action, immunological compatibility, tumorigenicity, the risk of transmitting disease, stability upon storage, the potential of new composition with other substances, and also ethical and political issues. We conclude that hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes have therapeutic potential for epilepsy, with hUMSC–exosomes being safer due to their reduced immunogenicity.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:36:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92a956f216074849baadddd00b2cb626
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8247
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:36:42Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceuticals
spelling doaj.art-92a956f216074849baadddd00b2cb6262023-11-24T01:51:49ZengMDPI AGPharmaceuticals1424-82472022-10-011510124710.3390/ph15101247hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?Sri Hastuti0Rinaldi Idroes1Imran Imran2Yetty Ramli3Abdul Hawil Abas4Trina Ekawati Tallei5Doctoral Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, IndonesiaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, IndonesiaDoctoral Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, IndonesiaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, IndonesiaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, IndonesiaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado 95115, IndonesiaEpilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain cell activity that results in seizures. It causes progressive damage to neurons. Epilepsy treatment currently focuses mostly on symptoms, which also have risks of unwanted side effects. There is currently no effective treatment to prevent epileptogenesis and the resulting neural damage. Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell (hUMSC) and exosome therapy are examples of cellular therapies that may be used to treat degenerative diseases, such as epilepsy, or cell damage. However, there is still little research on the use of hUMSCs or hUMSC–exosomes for treating epilepsy. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to compare the potential and risk of hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes as therapies for epilepsy. This article provides a brief summary of hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes in multiple aspects, such as the isolation and purification method, the mechanism of action, immunological compatibility, tumorigenicity, the risk of transmitting disease, stability upon storage, the potential of new composition with other substances, and also ethical and political issues. We conclude that hUMSCs and hUMSC–exosomes have therapeutic potential for epilepsy, with hUMSC–exosomes being safer due to their reduced immunogenicity.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/10/1247epilepsyhUMSCexosometherapyreview
spellingShingle Sri Hastuti
Rinaldi Idroes
Imran Imran
Yetty Ramli
Abdul Hawil Abas
Trina Ekawati Tallei
hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
Pharmaceuticals
epilepsy
hUMSC
exosome
therapy
review
title hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
title_full hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
title_fullStr hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
title_full_unstemmed hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
title_short hUMSC vs. hUMSC–Exosome: Which One Is Better for Epilepsy?
title_sort humsc vs humsc exosome which one is better for epilepsy
topic epilepsy
hUMSC
exosome
therapy
review
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/10/1247
work_keys_str_mv AT srihastuti humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy
AT rinaldiidroes humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy
AT imranimran humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy
AT yettyramli humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy
AT abdulhawilabas humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy
AT trinaekawatitallei humscvshumscexosomewhichoneisbetterforepilepsy