Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya

Abstract Pastoralists in the wildlife-rich East African rangelands use diversification into conservation and tourism as a strategy to supplement livestock-based livelihoods and to spread risk. Tourism incomes are an important alternative source during drought, when livestock incomes decline. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire Bedelian, Joseph O. Ogutu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01
Series:Pastoralism
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13570-017-0085-1
_version_ 1827158965379661824
author Claire Bedelian
Joseph O. Ogutu
author_facet Claire Bedelian
Joseph O. Ogutu
author_sort Claire Bedelian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Pastoralists in the wildlife-rich East African rangelands use diversification into conservation and tourism as a strategy to supplement livestock-based livelihoods and to spread risk. Tourism incomes are an important alternative source during drought, when livestock incomes decline. However, tourism may also reduce access to rangeland resources, and an abundant wildlife may destroy crops and injure, kill or transmit disease to livestock or people. This paper investigates the ability of wildlife conservancies in the Mara, Kenya, to act as an alternative for pastoralists that mitigates risks and maintains resilience in a changing climate. It analyses data to examine how conservancies contribute to and integrate with pastoral livelihoods, and to understand how pastoralists are managing their livestock herds in response to conservancies. It finds conservancy payments can provide an important, reliable, all-year-round source of income and prevent households from selling their animals during stress and for cash needs. Conservancies also retain grass banks during the dry season and provide opportunities for pastoralists to access good-quality forage. However, they reduce access to large areas of former grazing land and impose restrictions on livestock mobility. This affects the ability of pastoralists to remain flexible and able to access seasonally variable resources. Conflicts between grazing and conservancies may also heighten during drought times. Furthermore, income from land leases is not more than the contribution of livestock, meaning conservancy land leases create trade-offs for livestock-based livelihoods. Also, income is based on land ownership, which has inequity implications: women and other marginalised groups are left out.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T18:34:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92cc9be2db4242c5bda9522c89f5cfed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-7136
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-20T23:49:37Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Pastoralism
spelling doaj.art-92cc9be2db4242c5bda9522c89f5cfed2024-08-03T12:32:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Pastoralism2041-71362017-05-017112210.1186/s13570-017-0085-1Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, KenyaClaire Bedelian0Joseph O. Ogutu1International Livestock Research InstituteInternational Livestock Research InstituteAbstract Pastoralists in the wildlife-rich East African rangelands use diversification into conservation and tourism as a strategy to supplement livestock-based livelihoods and to spread risk. Tourism incomes are an important alternative source during drought, when livestock incomes decline. However, tourism may also reduce access to rangeland resources, and an abundant wildlife may destroy crops and injure, kill or transmit disease to livestock or people. This paper investigates the ability of wildlife conservancies in the Mara, Kenya, to act as an alternative for pastoralists that mitigates risks and maintains resilience in a changing climate. It analyses data to examine how conservancies contribute to and integrate with pastoral livelihoods, and to understand how pastoralists are managing their livestock herds in response to conservancies. It finds conservancy payments can provide an important, reliable, all-year-round source of income and prevent households from selling their animals during stress and for cash needs. Conservancies also retain grass banks during the dry season and provide opportunities for pastoralists to access good-quality forage. However, they reduce access to large areas of former grazing land and impose restrictions on livestock mobility. This affects the ability of pastoralists to remain flexible and able to access seasonally variable resources. Conflicts between grazing and conservancies may also heighten during drought times. Furthermore, income from land leases is not more than the contribution of livestock, meaning conservancy land leases create trade-offs for livestock-based livelihoods. Also, income is based on land ownership, which has inequity implications: women and other marginalised groups are left out.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13570-017-0085-1ConservanciesKenyaPastoral livelihoodsLivestock grazingLivestock trendsMaasai Mara
spellingShingle Claire Bedelian
Joseph O. Ogutu
Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
Pastoralism
Conservancies
Kenya
Pastoral livelihoods
Livestock grazing
Livestock trends
Maasai Mara
title Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
title_full Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
title_fullStr Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
title_short Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya
title_sort trade offs for climate resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the mara ecosystem kenya
topic Conservancies
Kenya
Pastoral livelihoods
Livestock grazing
Livestock trends
Maasai Mara
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13570-017-0085-1
work_keys_str_mv AT clairebedelian tradeoffsforclimateresilientpastorallivelihoodsinwildlifeconservanciesinthemaraecosystemkenya
AT josephoogutu tradeoffsforclimateresilientpastorallivelihoodsinwildlifeconservanciesinthemaraecosystemkenya