Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification

According to the European circular economy strategy, all plastic packaging placed on the market by 2030 has to be recyclable. However, for recycled plastics in direct contact with food, there are still major safety concerns because (non-)intentionally added substances can potentially migrate from re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Rung, Frank Welle, Anita Gruner, Arielle Springer, Zacharias Steinmetz, Katherine Munoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Recycling
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/1/24
_version_ 1797618450593480704
author Christian Rung
Frank Welle
Anita Gruner
Arielle Springer
Zacharias Steinmetz
Katherine Munoz
author_facet Christian Rung
Frank Welle
Anita Gruner
Arielle Springer
Zacharias Steinmetz
Katherine Munoz
author_sort Christian Rung
collection DOAJ
description According to the European circular economy strategy, all plastic packaging placed on the market by 2030 has to be recyclable. However, for recycled plastics in direct contact with food, there are still major safety concerns because (non-)intentionally added substances can potentially migrate from recycled polymers into foodstuffs. Therefore, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has derived very low migration limits (e.g., 0.1 µg/L for recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and 0.06 µg/L for recycled high-density polyethylene (HDPE)) for recycled polymers. Thus, the use of recyclates from post-consumer waste materials in direct food contact is currently only possible for PET. A first step in assessing potential health hazards is, therefore, the identification and toxicological classification of detected substances. Within this study, samples of post-consumer recyclates from different packaging-relevant recycling materials (HDPE, LDPE, PE, PP, PET, and PS) were analyzed. The detected substances were identified and examined with a focus on their abundance, toxicity (Cramer classification), polarity (log <i>P</i> values), chemical diversity, and origin (post-consumer substances vs. virgin base polymer substances). It was demonstrated that polyolefins contain more substances classified as toxic than PET, potentially due to their higher diffusivity. In addition, despite its low diffusivity compared to polyolefins, a high number of substances was found in PS. Further, post-consumer substances were found to be significantly more toxicologically concerning than virgin base polymer substances. Additionally, a correlation between high log <i>P</i> values and a high Cramer classification was found. It was concluded that PET is currently the only polymer that complies with EFSA’s requirements for a circular economy. However, better-structured collection systems and cleaning processes, as well as more analytical methods that enable a highly sensitive detection and identification of substances, might offer the possibility of implementing other polymers into recycling processes in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:13:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92d0c7edcb574f8ebb7d9f118fa728d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-4321
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:13:57Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Recycling
spelling doaj.art-92d0c7edcb574f8ebb7d9f118fa728d02023-11-16T22:58:30ZengMDPI AGRecycling2313-43212023-02-01812410.3390/recycling8010024Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological ClassificationChristian Rung0Frank Welle1Anita Gruner2Arielle Springer3Zacharias Steinmetz4Katherine Munoz5Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Straße 35, 85354 Freising, GermanyFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Straße 35, 85354 Freising, GermanyFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Straße 35, 85354 Freising, GermanyFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Straße 35, 85354 Freising, GermanyInstitute for Environmental Sciences (iES) Landau, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau, GermanyInstitute for Environmental Sciences (iES) Landau, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau, GermanyAccording to the European circular economy strategy, all plastic packaging placed on the market by 2030 has to be recyclable. However, for recycled plastics in direct contact with food, there are still major safety concerns because (non-)intentionally added substances can potentially migrate from recycled polymers into foodstuffs. Therefore, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has derived very low migration limits (e.g., 0.1 µg/L for recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and 0.06 µg/L for recycled high-density polyethylene (HDPE)) for recycled polymers. Thus, the use of recyclates from post-consumer waste materials in direct food contact is currently only possible for PET. A first step in assessing potential health hazards is, therefore, the identification and toxicological classification of detected substances. Within this study, samples of post-consumer recyclates from different packaging-relevant recycling materials (HDPE, LDPE, PE, PP, PET, and PS) were analyzed. The detected substances were identified and examined with a focus on their abundance, toxicity (Cramer classification), polarity (log <i>P</i> values), chemical diversity, and origin (post-consumer substances vs. virgin base polymer substances). It was demonstrated that polyolefins contain more substances classified as toxic than PET, potentially due to their higher diffusivity. In addition, despite its low diffusivity compared to polyolefins, a high number of substances was found in PS. Further, post-consumer substances were found to be significantly more toxicologically concerning than virgin base polymer substances. Additionally, a correlation between high log <i>P</i> values and a high Cramer classification was found. It was concluded that PET is currently the only polymer that complies with EFSA’s requirements for a circular economy. However, better-structured collection systems and cleaning processes, as well as more analytical methods that enable a highly sensitive detection and identification of substances, might offer the possibility of implementing other polymers into recycling processes in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/1/24non-intentionally added substances (NIAS)food packagingpolymer contaminantsrecyclingsafetyexposure
spellingShingle Christian Rung
Frank Welle
Anita Gruner
Arielle Springer
Zacharias Steinmetz
Katherine Munoz
Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
Recycling
non-intentionally added substances (NIAS)
food packaging
polymer contaminants
recycling
safety
exposure
title Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
title_full Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
title_fullStr Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
title_full_unstemmed Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
title_short Identification and Evaluation of (Non-)Intentionally Added Substances in Post-Consumer Recyclates and Their Toxicological Classification
title_sort identification and evaluation of non intentionally added substances in post consumer recyclates and their toxicological classification
topic non-intentionally added substances (NIAS)
food packaging
polymer contaminants
recycling
safety
exposure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/8/1/24
work_keys_str_mv AT christianrung identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification
AT frankwelle identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification
AT anitagruner identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification
AT ariellespringer identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification
AT zachariassteinmetz identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification
AT katherinemunoz identificationandevaluationofnonintentionallyaddedsubstancesinpostconsumerrecyclatesandtheirtoxicologicalclassification