Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to hea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santelli Ana, Mihigo Jules, de León Gabriel, Rowe Alexander K, Miller Nathan P, Van-Dúnem Pedro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:Malaria Journal
Online Access:http://www.malariajournal.com/content/8/1/275
_version_ 1811312253284122624
author Santelli Ana
Mihigo Jules
de León Gabriel
Rowe Alexander K
Miller Nathan P
Van-Dúnem Pedro
author_facet Santelli Ana
Mihigo Jules
de León Gabriel
Rowe Alexander K
Miller Nathan P
Van-Dúnem Pedro
author_sort Santelli Ana
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Implementation was complicated by a policy that was sometimes ambiguous.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fourteen months after implementation began, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 33 outpatient facilities in Huambo Province to assess their readiness to manage malaria and the quality of malaria case-management for patients of all ages. Consultations were observed, patients were interviewed and re-examined, and HWs were interviewed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ninety-three HWs and 177 consultations were evaluated, although many sampled consultations were missed. All facilities had AL in-stock and at least one HW trained to use AL and RDTs. However, anti-malarial stock-outs in the previous three months were common, clinical supervision was infrequent, and HWs had important knowledge gaps. Except for fever history, clinical assessments were often incomplete. Although testing was recommended for all patients with suspected malaria, only 30.7% of such patients were tested. Correct testing was significantly associated with caseloads < 25 patients/day (odds ratio: 18.4; p < 0.0001) and elevated patient temperature (odds ratio: 2.5 per 1°C increase; p = 0.007). Testing was more common among AL-trained HWs, but the association was borderline significant (p = 0.072). When the malaria test was negative, HWs often diagnosed patients with malaria (57.8%) and prescribed anti-malarials (60.0%). Sixty-six percent of malaria-related diagnoses were correct, 20.1% were minor errors, and 13.9% were major (potentially life-threatening) errors. Only 49.0% of malaria treatments were correct, 5.4% were minor errors, and 45.6% were major errors. HWs almost always dosed AL correctly and gave accurate dosing instructions to patients; however, other aspects of counseling needed improvement.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>By late-2007, substantial progress had been made to implement the malaria case-management policy in a setting with weak infrastructure. However, policy ambiguities, under-use of malaria testing, and distrust of negative test results led to many incorrect malaria diagnoses and treatments. In 2009, Angola published a policy that clarified many issues. As problems identified in this survey are not unique to Angola, better strategies for improving HW performance are urgently needed.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:32:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92f8184478c6442c8ae2108fd1c2c2fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-2875
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:32:48Z
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Malaria Journal
spelling doaj.art-92f8184478c6442c8ae2108fd1c2c2fe2022-12-22T02:50:08ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752009-12-018127510.1186/1475-2875-8-275Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in AngolaSantelli AnaMihigo Julesde León GabrielRowe Alexander KMiller Nathan PVan-Dúnem Pedro<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Angola's malaria case-management policy recommends treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). In 2006, AL implementation began in Huambo Province, which involved training health workers (HWs), supervision, delivering AL to health facilities, and improving malaria testing with microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Implementation was complicated by a policy that was sometimes ambiguous.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fourteen months after implementation began, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 33 outpatient facilities in Huambo Province to assess their readiness to manage malaria and the quality of malaria case-management for patients of all ages. Consultations were observed, patients were interviewed and re-examined, and HWs were interviewed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ninety-three HWs and 177 consultations were evaluated, although many sampled consultations were missed. All facilities had AL in-stock and at least one HW trained to use AL and RDTs. However, anti-malarial stock-outs in the previous three months were common, clinical supervision was infrequent, and HWs had important knowledge gaps. Except for fever history, clinical assessments were often incomplete. Although testing was recommended for all patients with suspected malaria, only 30.7% of such patients were tested. Correct testing was significantly associated with caseloads < 25 patients/day (odds ratio: 18.4; p < 0.0001) and elevated patient temperature (odds ratio: 2.5 per 1°C increase; p = 0.007). Testing was more common among AL-trained HWs, but the association was borderline significant (p = 0.072). When the malaria test was negative, HWs often diagnosed patients with malaria (57.8%) and prescribed anti-malarials (60.0%). Sixty-six percent of malaria-related diagnoses were correct, 20.1% were minor errors, and 13.9% were major (potentially life-threatening) errors. Only 49.0% of malaria treatments were correct, 5.4% were minor errors, and 45.6% were major errors. HWs almost always dosed AL correctly and gave accurate dosing instructions to patients; however, other aspects of counseling needed improvement.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>By late-2007, substantial progress had been made to implement the malaria case-management policy in a setting with weak infrastructure. However, policy ambiguities, under-use of malaria testing, and distrust of negative test results led to many incorrect malaria diagnoses and treatments. In 2009, Angola published a policy that clarified many issues. As problems identified in this survey are not unique to Angola, better strategies for improving HW performance are urgently needed.</p>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/8/1/275
spellingShingle Santelli Ana
Mihigo Jules
de León Gabriel
Rowe Alexander K
Miller Nathan P
Van-Dúnem Pedro
Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
Malaria Journal
title Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_full Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_fullStr Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_full_unstemmed Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_short Quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in Angola
title_sort quality of malaria case management at outpatient health facilities in angola
url http://www.malariajournal.com/content/8/1/275
work_keys_str_mv AT santelliana qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT mihigojules qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT deleongabriel qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT rowealexanderk qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT millernathanp qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola
AT vandunempedro qualityofmalariacasemanagementatoutpatienthealthfacilitiesinangola