Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Steen M Rønborg,1 Ulrik G Svendsen,2 Jesper S Micheelsen,3 Lars Ytte,4 Jakob N Andreasen,5 Lars Ehlers61The Pulmonology and Allergy Clinic of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, 3Private ENT practice, Aalborg, 4General Practice Aalborg, 5ALK, Hørsh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rønborg SM, Svendsen UG, Micheelsen JS, Ytte L, Andreasen JN, Ehlers L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2012-09-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/budget-impact-analysis-of-two-immunotherapy-products-for-treatment-of--a10965
_version_ 1818557798175211520
author Rønborg SM
Svendsen UG
Micheelsen JS
Ytte L
Andreasen JN
Ehlers L
author_facet Rønborg SM
Svendsen UG
Micheelsen JS
Ytte L
Andreasen JN
Ehlers L
author_sort Rønborg SM
collection DOAJ
description Steen M Rønborg,1 Ulrik G Svendsen,2 Jesper S Micheelsen,3 Lars Ytte,4 Jakob N Andreasen,5 Lars Ehlers61The Pulmonology and Allergy Clinic of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, 3Private ENT practice, Aalborg, 4General Practice Aalborg, 5ALK, Hørsholm, 6Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkBackground: Grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis constitutes a large burden for society. Up to 20% of European and United States (US) populations suffer from respiratory allergies, including grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The majority of patients are treated with symptomatic medications; however, a large proportion remains uncontrolled despite use of such treatments. Specific immunotherapy is the only treatment documented to target the underlying cause of the disease, leading to a sustained effect after completion of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the economic consequences of treating patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with either a grass allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT) or subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).Methods: A budget impact analysis was applied comparing SQ-standardized grass AIT (Grazax®; Phleum pratense, 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU; ALK, Denmark) with SCIT (Alutard®; P. pratense, 100,000 SQ-U/mL; ALK, Denmark). Budget impact analysis included health care utilization measured in physical units based on systematic literature reviews, guidelines, and expert opinions, as well as valuation in unit costs based on drug tariffs, physician fees, and wage statistics. Budget impact analysis was conducted from a Danish health care perspective.Results: Treating patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with grass AIT instead of grass SCIT resulted in a total reduction in treatment costs of €1291 per patient during a treatment course. This cost saving implies that approximately 40% more patients could be treated with grass AIT per year without influencing the cost of treatment.Conclusion: Budget impact analysis showed that grass AIT is a cost-saving alternative to SCIT when treating patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.Keywords: grass pollen, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergy immunotherapy tablet, subcutaneous immunotherapy, health economics, budget impact analysis
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:04:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-92fa2eb342294cd187711b8c6da33959
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:04:19Z
publishDate 2012-09-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-92fa2eb342294cd187711b8c6da339592022-12-21T23:26:08ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812012-09-012012default253260Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitisRønborg SMSvendsen UGMicheelsen JSYtte LAndreasen JNEhlers LSteen M Rønborg,1 Ulrik G Svendsen,2 Jesper S Micheelsen,3 Lars Ytte,4 Jakob N Andreasen,5 Lars Ehlers61The Pulmonology and Allergy Clinic of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, 3Private ENT practice, Aalborg, 4General Practice Aalborg, 5ALK, Hørsholm, 6Aalborg University, Aalborg, DenmarkBackground: Grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis constitutes a large burden for society. Up to 20% of European and United States (US) populations suffer from respiratory allergies, including grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The majority of patients are treated with symptomatic medications; however, a large proportion remains uncontrolled despite use of such treatments. Specific immunotherapy is the only treatment documented to target the underlying cause of the disease, leading to a sustained effect after completion of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the economic consequences of treating patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with either a grass allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT) or subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT).Methods: A budget impact analysis was applied comparing SQ-standardized grass AIT (Grazax®; Phleum pratense, 75,000 SQ-T/2,800 BAU; ALK, Denmark) with SCIT (Alutard®; P. pratense, 100,000 SQ-U/mL; ALK, Denmark). Budget impact analysis included health care utilization measured in physical units based on systematic literature reviews, guidelines, and expert opinions, as well as valuation in unit costs based on drug tariffs, physician fees, and wage statistics. Budget impact analysis was conducted from a Danish health care perspective.Results: Treating patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with grass AIT instead of grass SCIT resulted in a total reduction in treatment costs of €1291 per patient during a treatment course. This cost saving implies that approximately 40% more patients could be treated with grass AIT per year without influencing the cost of treatment.Conclusion: Budget impact analysis showed that grass AIT is a cost-saving alternative to SCIT when treating patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.Keywords: grass pollen, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergy immunotherapy tablet, subcutaneous immunotherapy, health economics, budget impact analysishttp://www.dovepress.com/budget-impact-analysis-of-two-immunotherapy-products-for-treatment-of--a10965
spellingShingle Rønborg SM
Svendsen UG
Micheelsen JS
Ytte L
Andreasen JN
Ehlers L
Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
title Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
title_full Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
title_fullStr Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
title_short Budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
title_sort budget impact analysis of two immunotherapy products for treatment of grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
url http://www.dovepress.com/budget-impact-analysis-of-two-immunotherapy-products-for-treatment-of--a10965
work_keys_str_mv AT ramposlashnborgsm budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis
AT svendsenug budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis
AT micheelsenjs budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis
AT yttel budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis
AT andreasenjn budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis
AT ehlersl budgetimpactanalysisoftwoimmunotherapyproductsfortreatmentofgrasspolleninducedallergicrhinoconjunctivitis