Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study
Background: Weighted hula-hoops have gained popularity, but whether they indeed reshape the trunk or have beneficial metabolic effects in overweight subjects is unknown. Objectives: To determine effects of hula-hooping and walking matched for energy expenditure on android fat %, trunk muscle mass, a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Karger Publishers
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Obesity Facts |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/500572 |
_version_ | 1819093303178559488 |
---|---|
author | Mari Lahelma Sanja Sädevirta Susanna Lallukka-Brück Ksenia Sevastianova Linda Mustelin Helena Gylling Bonny Rockette-Wagner Andrea M. Kriska Hannele Yki-Järvinen |
author_facet | Mari Lahelma Sanja Sädevirta Susanna Lallukka-Brück Ksenia Sevastianova Linda Mustelin Helena Gylling Bonny Rockette-Wagner Andrea M. Kriska Hannele Yki-Järvinen |
author_sort | Mari Lahelma |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Weighted hula-hoops have gained popularity, but whether they indeed reshape the trunk or have beneficial metabolic effects in overweight subjects is unknown. Objectives: To determine effects of hula-hooping and walking matched for energy expenditure on android fat %, trunk muscle mass, and metabolic parameters in a randomized cross-over study. Design: We recruited 55 overweight nondiabetic subjects, who were randomized to hula-hooping (HULA) for 6 weeks using a 1.5-kg weighted hula-hoop followed by walking (WALK) for another 6 weeks or vice versa. The increments in energy expenditure were similar by HULA and WALK. Body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and after HULA and WALK. The primary endpoint was the change in fat % in the android region. Results: A total of 53subjects (waist 92 ± 1 cm, body mass index 28 ± 1 kg/m2) completed the study. Body weight changed similarly (–0.6 ± 0.2 vs. –0.5 ± 0.2 kg, nonsignificant; HULA vs. WALK). During the intervention the subjects hula-hooped on average 12.8 ± 0.5 min/day and walked 9,986 ± 376 steps/day. The % fat in the android region decreased significantly by HULA but not by WALK (between-group change p < 0.001). Trunk muscle mass increased more by HULA than by WALK (p < 0.05). Waist circumference decreased more by HULA than by WALK (–3.1 ± 0.3 cm vs. –0.7 ± 0.4 cm, p < 0.001; HULA vs. WALK). WALK but not HULA significantly lowered systolic blood pressure and increased HDL cholesterol while HULA significantly decreased LDL cholesterol. Conclusions: Hula-hooping with a weighted hula-hoop can be used to decrease abdominal fat % and increase trunk muscle mass in overweight subjects. Its LDL lowering effect resembles that described for resistance training. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:09:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-92fd6d8ecf1c4e4db3362915fbd9e5e2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1662-4025 1662-4033 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T23:09:22Z |
publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
publisher | Karger Publishers |
record_format | Article |
series | Obesity Facts |
spelling | doaj.art-92fd6d8ecf1c4e4db3362915fbd9e5e22022-12-21T18:47:04ZengKarger PublishersObesity Facts1662-40251662-40332019-06-0112438539610.1159/000500572500572Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled StudyMari LahelmaSanja SädevirtaSusanna Lallukka-BrückKsenia SevastianovaLinda MustelinHelena GyllingBonny Rockette-WagnerAndrea M. KriskaHannele Yki-JärvinenBackground: Weighted hula-hoops have gained popularity, but whether they indeed reshape the trunk or have beneficial metabolic effects in overweight subjects is unknown. Objectives: To determine effects of hula-hooping and walking matched for energy expenditure on android fat %, trunk muscle mass, and metabolic parameters in a randomized cross-over study. Design: We recruited 55 overweight nondiabetic subjects, who were randomized to hula-hooping (HULA) for 6 weeks using a 1.5-kg weighted hula-hoop followed by walking (WALK) for another 6 weeks or vice versa. The increments in energy expenditure were similar by HULA and WALK. Body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and after HULA and WALK. The primary endpoint was the change in fat % in the android region. Results: A total of 53subjects (waist 92 ± 1 cm, body mass index 28 ± 1 kg/m2) completed the study. Body weight changed similarly (–0.6 ± 0.2 vs. –0.5 ± 0.2 kg, nonsignificant; HULA vs. WALK). During the intervention the subjects hula-hooped on average 12.8 ± 0.5 min/day and walked 9,986 ± 376 steps/day. The % fat in the android region decreased significantly by HULA but not by WALK (between-group change p < 0.001). Trunk muscle mass increased more by HULA than by WALK (p < 0.05). Waist circumference decreased more by HULA than by WALK (–3.1 ± 0.3 cm vs. –0.7 ± 0.4 cm, p < 0.001; HULA vs. WALK). WALK but not HULA significantly lowered systolic blood pressure and increased HDL cholesterol while HULA significantly decreased LDL cholesterol. Conclusions: Hula-hooping with a weighted hula-hoop can be used to decrease abdominal fat % and increase trunk muscle mass in overweight subjects. Its LDL lowering effect resembles that described for resistance training.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/500572Body compositionWaist circumferenceObesityExercise |
spellingShingle | Mari Lahelma Sanja Sädevirta Susanna Lallukka-Brück Ksenia Sevastianova Linda Mustelin Helena Gylling Bonny Rockette-Wagner Andrea M. Kriska Hannele Yki-Järvinen Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study Obesity Facts Body composition Waist circumference Obesity Exercise |
title | Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full | Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short | Effects of Weighted Hula-Hooping Compared to Walking on Abdominal Fat, Trunk Muscularity, and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort | effects of weighted hula hooping compared to walking on abdominal fat trunk muscularity and metabolic parameters in overweight subjects a randomized controlled study |
topic | Body composition Waist circumference Obesity Exercise |
url | https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/500572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marilahelma effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sanjasadevirta effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT susannalallukkabruck effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kseniasevastianova effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT lindamustelin effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT helenagylling effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT bonnyrockettewagner effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT andreamkriska effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hanneleykijarvinen effectsofweightedhulahoopingcomparedtowalkingonabdominalfattrunkmuscularityandmetabolicparametersinoverweightsubjectsarandomizedcontrolledstudy |