Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a devastating genetic disease for which gene-replacement therapy may bring substantial survival and quality of life benefits. Objective: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel C. Malone, Rebecca Dean, Ramesh Arjunji, Ivar Jensen, Phil Cyr, Beckley Miller, Benit Maru, Douglas M. Sproule, Douglas E. Feltner, Omar Dabbous
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1601484
_version_ 1797229462314549248
author Daniel C. Malone
Rebecca Dean
Ramesh Arjunji
Ivar Jensen
Phil Cyr
Beckley Miller
Benit Maru
Douglas M. Sproule
Douglas E. Feltner
Omar Dabbous
author_facet Daniel C. Malone
Rebecca Dean
Ramesh Arjunji
Ivar Jensen
Phil Cyr
Beckley Miller
Benit Maru
Douglas M. Sproule
Douglas E. Feltner
Omar Dabbous
author_sort Daniel C. Malone
collection DOAJ
description Background: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a devastating genetic disease for which gene-replacement therapy may bring substantial survival and quality of life benefits. Objective: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy for SMA1. Study design: A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of AVXS-101 versus nusinersen over a lifetime. Survival, healthcare costs and QALYs were estimated using natural history data for SMA patients who achieved motor milestones (sitting/walking). Health utility weights were obtained from the CHERISH trial. Setting: USA; commercial payer perspective Participants: SMA1 infants Interventions: AVXS-101 was compared to nusinersen. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was the ICER. Results: Expected survival (undiscounted) over a lifetime predicted by the model was 37.20 life years for AVXS-101 and 9.68 for nusinersen (discounted QALYs, 15.65 and 5.29, respectively). Using a potential AVXS-101 price range ($2.5-5.0M/treatment), the average lifetime cost/patient was $4.2–6.6M for AVXS-101 and $6.3M for nusinersen. The ICER range was (-$203,072) to $31,379 per QALY gained for AVXS-101 versus nusinersen, indicating that AVXS-101 was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M. Conclusion: Single-dose AVXS-101 was cost-effective compared to chronic nusinersen for SMA1 patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:12:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-930a9177e655400d90828ef1a4362fd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2001-6689
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:12:58Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
spelling doaj.art-930a9177e655400d90828ef1a4362fd92024-04-02T09:58:13ZengMDPI AGJournal of Market Access & Health Policy2001-66892019-01-017110.1080/20016689.2019.16014841601484Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patientsDaniel C. Malone0Rebecca Dean1Ramesh Arjunji2Ivar Jensen3Phil Cyr4Beckley Miller5Benit Maru6Douglas M. Sproule7Douglas E. Feltner8Omar Dabbous9University of ArizonaPrecision XtractAveXis, Inc.Precision XtractPrecision XtractPrecision XtractSSI StrategyAveXis, Inc.AveXis, Inc.AveXis, Inc.Background: Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a devastating genetic disease for which gene-replacement therapy may bring substantial survival and quality of life benefits. Objective: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) gene-replacement therapy for SMA1. Study design: A Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY), of AVXS-101 versus nusinersen over a lifetime. Survival, healthcare costs and QALYs were estimated using natural history data for SMA patients who achieved motor milestones (sitting/walking). Health utility weights were obtained from the CHERISH trial. Setting: USA; commercial payer perspective Participants: SMA1 infants Interventions: AVXS-101 was compared to nusinersen. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was the ICER. Results: Expected survival (undiscounted) over a lifetime predicted by the model was 37.20 life years for AVXS-101 and 9.68 for nusinersen (discounted QALYs, 15.65 and 5.29, respectively). Using a potential AVXS-101 price range ($2.5-5.0M/treatment), the average lifetime cost/patient was $4.2–6.6M for AVXS-101 and $6.3M for nusinersen. The ICER range was (-$203,072) to $31,379 per QALY gained for AVXS-101 versus nusinersen, indicating that AVXS-101 was cost-effective with prices of ≤$5M. Conclusion: Single-dose AVXS-101 was cost-effective compared to chronic nusinersen for SMA1 patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1601484avxs-101cost-effectivenessgene-replacement therapynusinersenonasemnogene abeparvovecspinal muscular atrophy type 1
spellingShingle Daniel C. Malone
Rebecca Dean
Ramesh Arjunji
Ivar Jensen
Phil Cyr
Beckley Miller
Benit Maru
Douglas M. Sproule
Douglas E. Feltner
Omar Dabbous
Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
avxs-101
cost-effectiveness
gene-replacement therapy
nusinersen
onasemnogene abeparvovec
spinal muscular atrophy type 1
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec (AVXS-101) in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of using onasemnogene abeparvocec avxs 101 in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients
topic avxs-101
cost-effectiveness
gene-replacement therapy
nusinersen
onasemnogene abeparvovec
spinal muscular atrophy type 1
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2019.1601484
work_keys_str_mv AT danielcmalone costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT rebeccadean costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT ramesharjunji costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT ivarjensen costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT philcyr costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT beckleymiller costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT benitmaru costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT douglasmsproule costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT douglasefeltner costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients
AT omardabbous costeffectivenessanalysisofusingonasemnogeneabeparvocecavxs101inspinalmuscularatrophytype1patients