Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil

Abstract Background Accessing folk knowledge from small-scale fishers is an affordable and reliable approach to understand the dynamic and diversity of shark species worldwide, especially of those eventually caught. In this context, ethnotaxonomy (folk identification and classification) may represen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho, Mônica Rocha de Oliveira, Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes, Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13002-018-0273-0
_version_ 1829513361034838016
author Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho
Mônica Rocha de Oliveira
Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes
Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira
author_facet Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho
Mônica Rocha de Oliveira
Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes
Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira
author_sort Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Accessing folk knowledge from small-scale fishers is an affordable and reliable approach to understand the dynamic and diversity of shark species worldwide, especially of those eventually caught. In this context, ethnotaxonomy (folk identification and classification) may represent an alternative to support sharks fisheries management, especially in data-poor places. This study aimed to investigate fishing and ethnotaxonomy of the main shark species caught by small-scale fisheries from the coastal waters of the Brazilian Northeast. Methods Semi-structured and structured interviews were conducted with fishers targeting general aspects of fishing activities and specific topics regarding ethnotaxonomy, capture, and commercialization of sharks. For species identification, an ethnobiological systematic perspective was used to analyze the folk nomenclature and classification criteria. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to verify associations between species caught, fishing gear, and harvest period. Results Fishers mentioned 73 binomial names, 21 main folk species, and eight synonymies. Some species belonging to the same scientific genus are often named and grouped by the same folk name, with no distinction between species by fishers. Sharks are most landed as bycatch and correspond to less than 5% of the total commercial fisheries in the communities, with socioeconomic value for subsistence consumption and local commercialization. Sharks were said to be mainly caught with hand line and surface long line during the rainy season, while gillnet captures were associated to the dry season. At least three of the species most mentioned by fishers are currently classified as vulnerable and endangered worldwide. Conclusions Even though landed sharks account for a small proportion of the fishing catches, their biological and life history features place sharks among the most vulnerable organisms globally. Such an ethnobiological approach towards shark identification may contribute to generate basic information on species caught, their frequency in the landings, and how different species belonging to the same genus can be landed and sold together. This type of information can generate subsidies to the development of conservation and management plans for these fishing resources, where knowledge is scarce.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T12:57:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93294652d6fc484198c177092cc4e97c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-4269
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T12:57:34Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
spelling doaj.art-93294652d6fc484198c177092cc4e97c2022-12-21T22:30:58ZengBMCJournal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine1746-42692018-11-0114111110.1186/s13002-018-0273-0Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of BrazilMarcelo Moreira de Carvalho0Mônica Rocha de Oliveira1Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes2Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira3Department of Oceanography and Limnology, Centre of Biosciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte—UFRNDepartment of Oceanography and Limnology, Centre of Biosciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte—UFRNFishing Ecology, Management, and Economics Group, Department of Ecology, Centre of Biosciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte—UFRNDepartment of Oceanography and Limnology, Centre of Biosciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte—UFRNAbstract Background Accessing folk knowledge from small-scale fishers is an affordable and reliable approach to understand the dynamic and diversity of shark species worldwide, especially of those eventually caught. In this context, ethnotaxonomy (folk identification and classification) may represent an alternative to support sharks fisheries management, especially in data-poor places. This study aimed to investigate fishing and ethnotaxonomy of the main shark species caught by small-scale fisheries from the coastal waters of the Brazilian Northeast. Methods Semi-structured and structured interviews were conducted with fishers targeting general aspects of fishing activities and specific topics regarding ethnotaxonomy, capture, and commercialization of sharks. For species identification, an ethnobiological systematic perspective was used to analyze the folk nomenclature and classification criteria. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to verify associations between species caught, fishing gear, and harvest period. Results Fishers mentioned 73 binomial names, 21 main folk species, and eight synonymies. Some species belonging to the same scientific genus are often named and grouped by the same folk name, with no distinction between species by fishers. Sharks are most landed as bycatch and correspond to less than 5% of the total commercial fisheries in the communities, with socioeconomic value for subsistence consumption and local commercialization. Sharks were said to be mainly caught with hand line and surface long line during the rainy season, while gillnet captures were associated to the dry season. At least three of the species most mentioned by fishers are currently classified as vulnerable and endangered worldwide. Conclusions Even though landed sharks account for a small proportion of the fishing catches, their biological and life history features place sharks among the most vulnerable organisms globally. Such an ethnobiological approach towards shark identification may contribute to generate basic information on species caught, their frequency in the landings, and how different species belonging to the same genus can be landed and sold together. This type of information can generate subsidies to the development of conservation and management plans for these fishing resources, where knowledge is scarce.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13002-018-0273-0Bycatch faunaFishers’ local knowledgeCoastal fishing resources
spellingShingle Marcelo Moreira de Carvalho
Mônica Rocha de Oliveira
Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes
Jorge Eduardo Lins Oliveira
Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Bycatch fauna
Fishers’ local knowledge
Coastal fishing resources
title Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
title_full Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
title_fullStr Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
title_short Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
title_sort ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of brazil
topic Bycatch fauna
Fishers’ local knowledge
Coastal fishing resources
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13002-018-0273-0
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelomoreiradecarvalho ethnotaxonomyofsharksfromtropicalwatersofbrazil
AT monicarochadeoliveira ethnotaxonomyofsharksfromtropicalwatersofbrazil
AT priscilafabianamacedolopes ethnotaxonomyofsharksfromtropicalwatersofbrazil
AT jorgeeduardolinsoliveira ethnotaxonomyofsharksfromtropicalwatersofbrazil