ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data

Abstract Some capture–recapture models for population estimation cannot easily be fitted by the usual methods (maximum likelihood and Markov‐chain Monte Carlo). For example, there is no straightforward probability model for the capture of animals in traps that hold a maximum of one individual (‘sing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Murray G. Efford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14088
_version_ 1827888351814877184
author Murray G. Efford
author_facet Murray G. Efford
author_sort Murray G. Efford
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Some capture–recapture models for population estimation cannot easily be fitted by the usual methods (maximum likelihood and Markov‐chain Monte Carlo). For example, there is no straightforward probability model for the capture of animals in traps that hold a maximum of one individual (‘single‐catch traps’), yet such data are commonly collected. It is usual to ignore the limit on individuals per trap and analyse with a competing‐risk ‘multi‐catch’ model that gives unbiased estimates of average density. However, that approach breaks down for models with varying density. Simulation and inverse prediction was suggested by Efford (2004) for estimating population density with data from single‐catch traps, but the method has been little used, in part because the existing software allows only a narrow range of models. I describe a new R package that refines the method and extends it to include models with varying density, trap interference and other sources of non‐independence among detection histories. The method depends on (i) a function of the data that generates a proxy for each parameter of interest and (ii) functions to simulate new datasets given values of the parameters. By simulating many datasets, it is possible to infer the relationship between proxies and parameters and, by inverting that relationship, to estimate the parameters from the observed data. The method is applied to data from a trapping study of brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula in New Zealand. A feature of these data is the high frequency of non‐capture events that disabled traps (interference). Allowing for a time‐varying interference process in a model fitted by simulation and inverse prediction increased the steepness of inferred year‐on‐year population decline. Drawbacks and possible extensions of the method are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:33:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9332cdb7e6bf46639d9dc390c137fb27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-210X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:33:25Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Methods in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-9332cdb7e6bf46639d9dc390c137fb272023-08-01T18:55:35ZengWileyMethods in Ecology and Evolution2041-210X2023-05-011451182118910.1111/2041-210X.14088ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture dataMurray G. Efford0Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandAbstract Some capture–recapture models for population estimation cannot easily be fitted by the usual methods (maximum likelihood and Markov‐chain Monte Carlo). For example, there is no straightforward probability model for the capture of animals in traps that hold a maximum of one individual (‘single‐catch traps’), yet such data are commonly collected. It is usual to ignore the limit on individuals per trap and analyse with a competing‐risk ‘multi‐catch’ model that gives unbiased estimates of average density. However, that approach breaks down for models with varying density. Simulation and inverse prediction was suggested by Efford (2004) for estimating population density with data from single‐catch traps, but the method has been little used, in part because the existing software allows only a narrow range of models. I describe a new R package that refines the method and extends it to include models with varying density, trap interference and other sources of non‐independence among detection histories. The method depends on (i) a function of the data that generates a proxy for each parameter of interest and (ii) functions to simulate new datasets given values of the parameters. By simulating many datasets, it is possible to infer the relationship between proxies and parameters and, by inverting that relationship, to estimate the parameters from the observed data. The method is applied to data from a trapping study of brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula in New Zealand. A feature of these data is the high frequency of non‐capture events that disabled traps (interference). Allowing for a time‐varying interference process in a model fitted by simulation and inverse prediction increased the steepness of inferred year‐on‐year population decline. Drawbacks and possible extensions of the method are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14088density estimationinterferencenon‐independencenon‐target capturessecrsingle‐catch traps
spellingShingle Murray G. Efford
ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
density estimation
interference
non‐independence
non‐target captures
secr
single‐catch traps
title ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
title_full ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
title_fullStr ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
title_full_unstemmed ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
title_short ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture–recapture data
title_sort ipsecr an r package for awkward spatial capture recapture data
topic density estimation
interference
non‐independence
non‐target captures
secr
single‐catch traps
url https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14088
work_keys_str_mv AT murraygefford ipsecranrpackageforawkwardspatialcapturerecapturedata