Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area

The data from a permanent monitoring station, based on a sound card as an AD/DA converter and a magnetic loop antenna for continuous recording of electromagnetic field intensities in the Very Low Frequency (VLF) range, were recorded and compared with data from a seismic station based on Raspberry Pi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michal HOFFMAN, Eduard KOČI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia 2024-04-01
Series:Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.geo.sav.sk/cgg/article/view/499
_version_ 1797221432598462464
author Michal HOFFMAN
Eduard KOČI
author_facet Michal HOFFMAN
Eduard KOČI
author_sort Michal HOFFMAN
collection DOAJ
description The data from a permanent monitoring station, based on a sound card as an AD/DA converter and a magnetic loop antenna for continuous recording of electromagnetic field intensities in the Very Low Frequency (VLF) range, were recorded and compared with data from a seismic station based on Raspberry Pi located in a landslide-affected area. The stations operated 24/7 and were placed in a room below ground level. Correlations were observed between seismic signals in the frequency spectrum from 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz (some extending beyond 20 Hz) and anomalies in the electromagnetic field in the VLF range. These anomalies are likely associated with micro-fracturing, piezo-electromagnetic, and triboelectric phenomena within the landslide body, producing relatively weak VLF emissions and a faint seismic signal. A single-component 4.5 Hz 395 Ohm vertical Racotech RGI-20DX geophone with electronic extension to lower frequencies (< 1 Hz) was used with a sampling rate of 100 sps (samples per second). VLF emissions cover almost the entire spectrum from 6 kHz with a peak at 14 kHz to 18 kHz. The received spectrum was divided into following sections: VLF band 4 kHz – 6 kHz; 6 kHz – 8 kHz; 8 kHz – 10 kHz; 10 kHz – 12 kHz; 12 kHz – 14 kHz; 14 kHz – 16 kHz; 16 kHz – 18 kHz. Simultaneously, there were changes in these sections analysed and compared with the seismic record within the same time interval.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:05:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93384fa910234dd9a4132261e028c1f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1338-0540
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:05:21Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovakia
record_format Article
series Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy
spelling doaj.art-93384fa910234dd9a4132261e028c1f92024-04-05T08:34:22ZengEarth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, SlovakiaContributions to Geophysics and Geodesy1338-05402024-04-01541678410.31577/congeo.2024.54.1.4499Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected areaMichal HOFFMAN0Eduard KOČI1Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-840 05, Bratislava, Slovak RepublicEarth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-840 05, Bratislava, Slovak RepublicThe data from a permanent monitoring station, based on a sound card as an AD/DA converter and a magnetic loop antenna for continuous recording of electromagnetic field intensities in the Very Low Frequency (VLF) range, were recorded and compared with data from a seismic station based on Raspberry Pi located in a landslide-affected area. The stations operated 24/7 and were placed in a room below ground level. Correlations were observed between seismic signals in the frequency spectrum from 0.1 Hz to 10 Hz (some extending beyond 20 Hz) and anomalies in the electromagnetic field in the VLF range. These anomalies are likely associated with micro-fracturing, piezo-electromagnetic, and triboelectric phenomena within the landslide body, producing relatively weak VLF emissions and a faint seismic signal. A single-component 4.5 Hz 395 Ohm vertical Racotech RGI-20DX geophone with electronic extension to lower frequencies (< 1 Hz) was used with a sampling rate of 100 sps (samples per second). VLF emissions cover almost the entire spectrum from 6 kHz with a peak at 14 kHz to 18 kHz. The received spectrum was divided into following sections: VLF band 4 kHz – 6 kHz; 6 kHz – 8 kHz; 8 kHz – 10 kHz; 10 kHz – 12 kHz; 12 kHz – 14 kHz; 14 kHz – 16 kHz; 16 kHz – 18 kHz. Simultaneously, there were changes in these sections analysed and compared with the seismic record within the same time interval.https://journal.geo.sav.sk/cgg/article/view/499landslides, very low frequency, seismometer, natural radio emissions
spellingShingle Michal HOFFMAN
Eduard KOČI
Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy
landslides, very low frequency, seismometer, natural radio emissions
title Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
title_full Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
title_fullStr Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
title_short Comparison of anomalies in the VLF spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide-affected area
title_sort comparison of anomalies in the vlf spectrum of the natural electromagnetic field with data from the seismometer in a landslide affected area
topic landslides, very low frequency, seismometer, natural radio emissions
url https://journal.geo.sav.sk/cgg/article/view/499
work_keys_str_mv AT michalhoffman comparisonofanomaliesinthevlfspectrumofthenaturalelectromagneticfieldwithdatafromtheseismometerinalandslideaffectedarea
AT eduardkoci comparisonofanomaliesinthevlfspectrumofthenaturalelectromagneticfieldwithdatafromtheseismometerinalandslideaffectedarea