Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis
Objective: Inter-observer differences in the diagnosis of HPV related cervical lesions are problematic and response of gynecologists to these diagnostic entities is non-standardized. This study evaluated the diagnostic reproducibility of “cervical intraepithelial neoplasia” (CIN) and “squamous intra...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Türk Patoloji Dergisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.turkjpath.org/pdf.php3?id=1837 |
_version_ | 1797916514724085760 |
---|---|
author | Arzu SAĞLAM Alp USUBÜTÜN Anıl DOLGUN George L. MUTTER M. Coşkun SALMAN Olcay KURTULAN Aytekin AKYOL Eylem AKAR ÖZKAN Sema BAYKARA Dilek BÜLBÜL Zerrin CALAY Funda EREN Derya GÜMÜRDÜLÜ Nihan HABERAL Şennur İLVAN Şeyda KARAVELİ Meral KOYUNCUOĞLU Bahar MÜEZZİNOĞLU Kamil Hakan MÜFTÜOĞLU Özlem ÖZEN Necmettin ÖZDEMİR Elif PEŞTERELİ Çağnur ULUKUŞ Osman ZEKİOĞLU |
author_facet | Arzu SAĞLAM Alp USUBÜTÜN Anıl DOLGUN George L. MUTTER M. Coşkun SALMAN Olcay KURTULAN Aytekin AKYOL Eylem AKAR ÖZKAN Sema BAYKARA Dilek BÜLBÜL Zerrin CALAY Funda EREN Derya GÜMÜRDÜLÜ Nihan HABERAL Şennur İLVAN Şeyda KARAVELİ Meral KOYUNCUOĞLU Bahar MÜEZZİNOĞLU Kamil Hakan MÜFTÜOĞLU Özlem ÖZEN Necmettin ÖZDEMİR Elif PEŞTERELİ Çağnur ULUKUŞ Osman ZEKİOĞLU |
author_sort | Arzu SAĞLAM |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: Inter-observer differences in the diagnosis of HPV related cervical lesions are problematic and response of gynecologists to these diagnostic entities is non-standardized. This study evaluated the diagnostic reproducibility of “cervical intraepithelial neoplasia” (CIN) and “squamous intraepithelial lesion” (SIL) diagnoses.
Material and Method: 19 pathologists evaluated 66 cases once using H&E slides and once with immunohistochemical studies (p16, Ki-67 and Pro-ExC). Management response to diagnoses was evaluated amongst 12 gynecologists. Pathologists and gynecologists were also given a questionnaire about how additional information like smear results and age modify diagnosis and management.
Results: We show moderate interobserver diagnostic reproducibility amongst pathologists. The overall kappa value was 0.50 and 0.59 using the CIN and SIL classifications respectively. Impact of immunohistochemical evaluation on interpretation of cases differed and there was lack of statistically significant improvement of interobserver diagnostic reproducibility with the addition of immunohistochemistry. We saw that choice of treatment methods amongst gynecologists varied and overall concordance was only fair to moderate. The CIN2 diagnostic category was seen to have the lowest percentage agreement amongst both pathologists and gynecologists. We showed that pathologists had diagnostic “styles” and gynecologists had management “styles”.
Conclusion: In summary each pathologist had different diagnostic tendencies which were affected not only by histopathology and marker studies, but also by the patient management tendencies of the gynecologist that the pathologist worked with. The two-tiered modified Bethesda system improved diagnostic agreement. We concluded that immunohistochemistry should be used only to resolve problems in select cases and not for every case. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:58:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-933df7933d8f4984919d4c3ab059e06b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1018-5615 1309-5730 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:58:18Z |
publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
publisher | Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies |
record_format | Article |
series | Türk Patoloji Dergisi |
spelling | doaj.art-933df7933d8f4984919d4c3ab059e06b2023-02-15T16:13:18ZengFederation of Turkish Pathology SocietiesTürk Patoloji Dergisi1018-56151309-57302017-09-0133317719110.5146/tjpath.2017.01400Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the DiagnosisArzu SAĞLAMAlp USUBÜTÜNAnıl DOLGUNGeorge L. MUTTERM. Coşkun SALMANOlcay KURTULANAytekin AKYOLEylem AKAR ÖZKANSema BAYKARADilek BÜLBÜLZerrin CALAYFunda ERENDerya GÜMÜRDÜLÜNihan HABERALŞennur İLVANŞeyda KARAVELİMeral KOYUNCUOĞLUBahar MÜEZZİNOĞLUKamil Hakan MÜFTÜOĞLUÖzlem ÖZENNecmettin ÖZDEMİRElif PEŞTERELİÇağnur ULUKUŞOsman ZEKİOĞLU Objective: Inter-observer differences in the diagnosis of HPV related cervical lesions are problematic and response of gynecologists to these diagnostic entities is non-standardized. This study evaluated the diagnostic reproducibility of “cervical intraepithelial neoplasia” (CIN) and “squamous intraepithelial lesion” (SIL) diagnoses. Material and Method: 19 pathologists evaluated 66 cases once using H&E slides and once with immunohistochemical studies (p16, Ki-67 and Pro-ExC). Management response to diagnoses was evaluated amongst 12 gynecologists. Pathologists and gynecologists were also given a questionnaire about how additional information like smear results and age modify diagnosis and management. Results: We show moderate interobserver diagnostic reproducibility amongst pathologists. The overall kappa value was 0.50 and 0.59 using the CIN and SIL classifications respectively. Impact of immunohistochemical evaluation on interpretation of cases differed and there was lack of statistically significant improvement of interobserver diagnostic reproducibility with the addition of immunohistochemistry. We saw that choice of treatment methods amongst gynecologists varied and overall concordance was only fair to moderate. The CIN2 diagnostic category was seen to have the lowest percentage agreement amongst both pathologists and gynecologists. We showed that pathologists had diagnostic “styles” and gynecologists had management “styles”. Conclusion: In summary each pathologist had different diagnostic tendencies which were affected not only by histopathology and marker studies, but also by the patient management tendencies of the gynecologist that the pathologist worked with. The two-tiered modified Bethesda system improved diagnostic agreement. We concluded that immunohistochemistry should be used only to resolve problems in select cases and not for every case.http://www.turkjpath.org/pdf.php3?id=1837Interobserver reproducibilitySILCINDiagnosisGynecologist |
spellingShingle | Arzu SAĞLAM Alp USUBÜTÜN Anıl DOLGUN George L. MUTTER M. Coşkun SALMAN Olcay KURTULAN Aytekin AKYOL Eylem AKAR ÖZKAN Sema BAYKARA Dilek BÜLBÜL Zerrin CALAY Funda EREN Derya GÜMÜRDÜLÜ Nihan HABERAL Şennur İLVAN Şeyda KARAVELİ Meral KOYUNCUOĞLU Bahar MÜEZZİNOĞLU Kamil Hakan MÜFTÜOĞLU Özlem ÖZEN Necmettin ÖZDEMİR Elif PEŞTERELİ Çağnur ULUKUŞ Osman ZEKİOĞLU Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis Türk Patoloji Dergisi Interobserver reproducibility SIL CIN Diagnosis Gynecologist |
title | Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis |
title_full | Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis |
title_short | Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis |
title_sort | diagnostic and treatment reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia squamous intraepithelial lesion and factors affecting the diagnosis |
topic | Interobserver reproducibility SIL CIN Diagnosis Gynecologist |
url | http://www.turkjpath.org/pdf.php3?id=1837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arzusaglam diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT alpusubutun diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT anıldolgun diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT georgelmutter diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT mcoskunsalman diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT olcaykurtulan diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT aytekinakyol diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT eylemakarozkan diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT semabaykara diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT dilekbulbul diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT zerrincalay diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT fundaeren diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT deryagumurdulu diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT nihanhaberal diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT sennurilvan diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT seydakaraveli diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT meralkoyuncuoglu diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT baharmuezzinoglu diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT kamilhakanmuftuoglu diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT ozlemozen diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT necmettinozdemir diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT elifpestereli diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT cagnurulukus diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis AT osmanzekioglu diagnosticandtreatmentreproducibilityofcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiasquamousintraepitheliallesionandfactorsaffectingthediagnosis |