Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete

Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) as a cement-less construction material has attracted worldwide attention due to its lower carbon footprint. There are numerous studies reported on GPC made using different by-products including fly-ash. However, since the use of bottom-ash is comparatively limited, making p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peiman Azarsa, Rishi Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/6/101
_version_ 1797566575394422784
author Peiman Azarsa
Rishi Gupta
author_facet Peiman Azarsa
Rishi Gupta
author_sort Peiman Azarsa
collection DOAJ
description Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) as a cement-less construction material has attracted worldwide attention due to its lower carbon footprint. There are numerous studies reported on GPC made using different by-products including fly-ash. However, since the use of bottom-ash is comparatively limited, making potassium-based GPC using this waste can be an alternative to Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). In this study, two methods of accelerated curing were used to determine the influence of elevated temperature on the compressive strength of GPC, composed of 50% bottom-ash and 50% fly-ash. GPC specimens were cured using various temperatures including ambient, 30 °C, 45 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C for 24 h, all followed by 28 days of ambient curing. The highest compressive strength was obtained with steam curing at a temperature of 80 °C for a duration of 24 h. It is of great significance to evaluate elastic modulus of the concrete mixture so that the short-term rigidity of structures subjected to elongation, bending, or compression can be predicted. In this study, a longitudinal Resonant Frequency Test (RFT) as a non-destructive test (NDT) was used to calculate the elastic modulus of both GPC and a comparative PCC mix. Based on the results, PCC had higher resonant frequency (by about 1000 Hz) compared to GPC. A review of empirical models for predicting GPC’s elastic modulus showed that all of the predicted elastic modulus values were lower than experimental values.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T19:28:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-933f9aff36c24a6489312d09a1a1501e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T19:28:50Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-933f9aff36c24a6489312d09a1a1501e2023-11-20T02:19:35ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092020-05-0110610110.3390/buildings10060101Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer ConcretePeiman Azarsa0Rishi Gupta1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, CanadaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, CanadaGeopolymer Concrete (GPC) as a cement-less construction material has attracted worldwide attention due to its lower carbon footprint. There are numerous studies reported on GPC made using different by-products including fly-ash. However, since the use of bottom-ash is comparatively limited, making potassium-based GPC using this waste can be an alternative to Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). In this study, two methods of accelerated curing were used to determine the influence of elevated temperature on the compressive strength of GPC, composed of 50% bottom-ash and 50% fly-ash. GPC specimens were cured using various temperatures including ambient, 30 °C, 45 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C for 24 h, all followed by 28 days of ambient curing. The highest compressive strength was obtained with steam curing at a temperature of 80 °C for a duration of 24 h. It is of great significance to evaluate elastic modulus of the concrete mixture so that the short-term rigidity of structures subjected to elongation, bending, or compression can be predicted. In this study, a longitudinal Resonant Frequency Test (RFT) as a non-destructive test (NDT) was used to calculate the elastic modulus of both GPC and a comparative PCC mix. Based on the results, PCC had higher resonant frequency (by about 1000 Hz) compared to GPC. A review of empirical models for predicting GPC’s elastic modulus showed that all of the predicted elastic modulus values were lower than experimental values.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/6/101geopolymer concretecuring regimeresonant frequencyelastic moduluspredictive models
spellingShingle Peiman Azarsa
Rishi Gupta
Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
Buildings
geopolymer concrete
curing regime
resonant frequency
elastic modulus
predictive models
title Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
title_full Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
title_fullStr Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
title_short Comparative Study Involving Effect of Curing Regime on Elastic Modulus of Geopolymer Concrete
title_sort comparative study involving effect of curing regime on elastic modulus of geopolymer concrete
topic geopolymer concrete
curing regime
resonant frequency
elastic modulus
predictive models
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/10/6/101
work_keys_str_mv AT peimanazarsa comparativestudyinvolvingeffectofcuringregimeonelasticmodulusofgeopolymerconcrete
AT rishigupta comparativestudyinvolvingeffectofcuringregimeonelasticmodulusofgeopolymerconcrete