Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality

This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Nemes
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Catholic University of Louvain 2023-06-01
Series:TheoLogica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353
_version_ 1797794572390105088
author Steven Nemes
author_facet Steven Nemes
author_sort Steven Nemes
collection DOAJ
description This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:04:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9342af445f2f4402a566d58a34cdcfae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2593-0265
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:04:57Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Catholic University of Louvain
record_format Article
series TheoLogica
spelling doaj.art-9342af445f2f4402a566d58a34cdcfae2023-06-27T07:37:25ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652023-06-018110.14428/thl.v8i1.68353Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and ConsubstantialitySteven Nemes0North Phoenix Preparatory Academy This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353JesusIncarnationNicene ChristologyChalcedonian ChristologyhomoousiosTimothy Pawl
spellingShingle Steven Nemes
Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
TheoLogica
Jesus
Incarnation
Nicene Christology
Chalcedonian Christology
homoousios
Timothy Pawl
title Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
title_full Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
title_fullStr Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
title_full_unstemmed Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
title_short Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
title_sort jesus s confession of ignorance and consubstantiality
topic Jesus
Incarnation
Nicene Christology
Chalcedonian Christology
homoousios
Timothy Pawl
url https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353
work_keys_str_mv AT stevennemes jesussconfessionofignoranceandconsubstantiality