Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Catholic University of Louvain
2023-06-01
|
Series: | TheoLogica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353 |
_version_ | 1797794572390105088 |
---|---|
author | Steven Nemes |
author_facet | Steven Nemes |
author_sort | Steven Nemes |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:04:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-9342af445f2f4402a566d58a34cdcfae |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2593-0265 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T03:04:57Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | Catholic University of Louvain |
record_format | Article |
series | TheoLogica |
spelling | doaj.art-9342af445f2f4402a566d58a34cdcfae2023-06-27T07:37:25ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652023-06-018110.14428/thl.v8i1.68353Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and ConsubstantialitySteven Nemes0North Phoenix Preparatory Academy This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353JesusIncarnationNicene ChristologyChalcedonian ChristologyhomoousiosTimothy Pawl |
spellingShingle | Steven Nemes Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality TheoLogica Jesus Incarnation Nicene Christology Chalcedonian Christology homoousios Timothy Pawl |
title | Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality |
title_full | Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality |
title_fullStr | Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality |
title_full_unstemmed | Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality |
title_short | Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality |
title_sort | jesus s confession of ignorance and consubstantiality |
topic | Jesus Incarnation Nicene Christology Chalcedonian Christology homoousios Timothy Pawl |
url | https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/68353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevennemes jesussconfessionofignoranceandconsubstantiality |