Jsou rozdílné lhůty pro podání jednotlivých typů správních žalob překážkou na cestě k jednotné správní žalobě?

The thesis first deals with the current state of legal regulation of procedural time limits for filing lawsuits against a decision of an administrative body, for protection against inactivity of an administrative body and for protection against illegal intervention, instruction, or coercion of an ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Codl
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2022-09-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/23366478.2022.39
Description
Summary:The thesis first deals with the current state of legal regulation of procedural time limits for filing lawsuits against a decision of an administrative body, for protection against inactivity of an administrative body and for protection against illegal intervention, instruction, or coercion of an administrative body. The issue of measures of a general nature is left aside, as they are rather similar to judicial review of legislation. The author concludes that although the issue of time limits is one of the key obstacles in examining the (im)possibility of introducing a universal administrative legal action, as it is not the only problem and therefore this question remains open. However, the current state of the legal deadlines de lege ferenda requires some improvements, in particular, the possibility of waiving a missed deadline and introducing more permeability between different types of actions by making the deadlines more standardized.
ISSN:0323-0619
2336-6478