Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
<p>Climate sensitivity to <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> remains the key uncertainty in projections of future climate change. Transient climate response (TCR) is the metric of temperature sensitivity that is most relevant to warming in the...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | Earth System Dynamics |
| Online Access: | https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/11/737/2020/esd-11-737-2020.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818148967632863232 |
|---|---|
| author | F. J. M. M. Nijsse P. M. Cox M. S. Williamson M. S. Williamson |
| author_facet | F. J. M. M. Nijsse P. M. Cox M. S. Williamson M. S. Williamson |
| author_sort | F. J. M. M. Nijsse |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Climate sensitivity to <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> remains the key uncertainty in projections of future climate change. Transient climate response (TCR) is the metric of temperature sensitivity that is most relevant to warming in the next few decades and contributes the biggest uncertainty to estimates of the carbon budgets consistent with the Paris targets. Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is vital for understanding longer-term climate change and stabilisation targets. In the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5), the stated “likely” ranges (16 %–84 % confidence) of TCR (1.0–2.5 K) and ECS (1.5–4.5 K) were broadly consistent with the ensemble of CMIP5 Earth system models (ESMs) available at the time. However, many of the latest CMIP6 ESMs have larger climate sensitivities, with 5 of 34 models having TCR values above 2.5 K and an ensemble mean TCR of <span class="inline-formula">2.0±0.4</span> K. Even starker, 12 of 34 models have an ECS value above 4.5 K. On the face of it, these latest ESM results suggest that the IPCC likely ranges may need revising upwards, which would cast further doubt on the feasibility of the Paris targets.</p>
<p>Here we show that rather than increasing the uncertainty in climate sensitivity, the CMIP6 models help to constrain the likely range of TCR to 1.3–2.1 K, with a central estimate of 1.68 K. We reach this conclusion through an emergent constraint approach which relates the value of TCR linearly to the global warming from 1975 onwards. This is a period when the signal-to-noise ratio of the net radiative forcing increases strongly, so that uncertainties in aerosol forcing become progressively less problematic. We find a consistent emergent constraint on TCR when we apply the same method to CMIP5 models. Our constraints on TCR are in good agreement with other recent studies which analysed CMIP ensembles. The relationship between ECS and the post-1975 warming trend is less direct and also non-linear. However, we are able to derive a likely range of ECS of 1.9–3.4 K from the CMIP6 models by assuming an underlying emergent relationship based on a two-box energy balance model. Despite some methodological differences; this is consistent with a previously published ECS constraint derived from warming trends in CMIP5 models to 2005. Our results seem to be part of a growing consensus amongst studies that have applied the emergent constraint approach to different model ensembles and to different aspects of the record of global warming.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:59:33Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-934c10959f874d9c86ba501968f2911c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2190-4979 2190-4987 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T12:59:33Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Earth System Dynamics |
| spelling | doaj.art-934c10959f874d9c86ba501968f2911c2022-12-22T01:06:30ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth System Dynamics2190-49792190-49872020-08-011173775010.5194/esd-11-737-2020Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 modelsF. J. M. M. Nijsse0P. M. Cox1M. S. Williamson2M. S. Williamson3College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UKCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UKCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UKGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QE, UK<p>Climate sensitivity to <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span> remains the key uncertainty in projections of future climate change. Transient climate response (TCR) is the metric of temperature sensitivity that is most relevant to warming in the next few decades and contributes the biggest uncertainty to estimates of the carbon budgets consistent with the Paris targets. Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is vital for understanding longer-term climate change and stabilisation targets. In the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5), the stated “likely” ranges (16 %–84 % confidence) of TCR (1.0–2.5 K) and ECS (1.5–4.5 K) were broadly consistent with the ensemble of CMIP5 Earth system models (ESMs) available at the time. However, many of the latest CMIP6 ESMs have larger climate sensitivities, with 5 of 34 models having TCR values above 2.5 K and an ensemble mean TCR of <span class="inline-formula">2.0±0.4</span> K. Even starker, 12 of 34 models have an ECS value above 4.5 K. On the face of it, these latest ESM results suggest that the IPCC likely ranges may need revising upwards, which would cast further doubt on the feasibility of the Paris targets.</p> <p>Here we show that rather than increasing the uncertainty in climate sensitivity, the CMIP6 models help to constrain the likely range of TCR to 1.3–2.1 K, with a central estimate of 1.68 K. We reach this conclusion through an emergent constraint approach which relates the value of TCR linearly to the global warming from 1975 onwards. This is a period when the signal-to-noise ratio of the net radiative forcing increases strongly, so that uncertainties in aerosol forcing become progressively less problematic. We find a consistent emergent constraint on TCR when we apply the same method to CMIP5 models. Our constraints on TCR are in good agreement with other recent studies which analysed CMIP ensembles. The relationship between ECS and the post-1975 warming trend is less direct and also non-linear. However, we are able to derive a likely range of ECS of 1.9–3.4 K from the CMIP6 models by assuming an underlying emergent relationship based on a two-box energy balance model. Despite some methodological differences; this is consistent with a previously published ECS constraint derived from warming trends in CMIP5 models to 2005. Our results seem to be part of a growing consensus amongst studies that have applied the emergent constraint approach to different model ensembles and to different aspects of the record of global warming.</p>https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/11/737/2020/esd-11-737-2020.pdf |
| spellingShingle | F. J. M. M. Nijsse P. M. Cox M. S. Williamson M. S. Williamson Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models Earth System Dynamics |
| title | Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models |
| title_full | Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models |
| title_fullStr | Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models |
| title_full_unstemmed | Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models |
| title_short | Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models |
| title_sort | emergent constraints on transient climate response tcr and equilibrium climate sensitivity ecs from historical warming in cmip5 and cmip6 models |
| url | https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/11/737/2020/esd-11-737-2020.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fjmmnijsse emergentconstraintsontransientclimateresponsetcrandequilibriumclimatesensitivityecsfromhistoricalwarmingincmip5andcmip6models AT pmcox emergentconstraintsontransientclimateresponsetcrandequilibriumclimatesensitivityecsfromhistoricalwarmingincmip5andcmip6models AT mswilliamson emergentconstraintsontransientclimateresponsetcrandequilibriumclimatesensitivityecsfromhistoricalwarmingincmip5andcmip6models AT mswilliamson emergentconstraintsontransientclimateresponsetcrandequilibriumclimatesensitivityecsfromhistoricalwarmingincmip5andcmip6models |