Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors

Due to its safety, portability, and cheapness, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) use largely increased in research and clinical settings. Despite tDCS’s wide application, previous works pointed out inconsistent and low replicable results, sometimes leading to extreme conclusions about t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra Vergallito, Sarah Feroldi, Alberto Pisoni, Leonor J. Romero Lauro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/5/522
_version_ 1797501186732982272
author Alessandra Vergallito
Sarah Feroldi
Alberto Pisoni
Leonor J. Romero Lauro
author_facet Alessandra Vergallito
Sarah Feroldi
Alberto Pisoni
Leonor J. Romero Lauro
author_sort Alessandra Vergallito
collection DOAJ
description Due to its safety, portability, and cheapness, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) use largely increased in research and clinical settings. Despite tDCS’s wide application, previous works pointed out inconsistent and low replicable results, sometimes leading to extreme conclusions about tDCS’s ineffectiveness in modulating behavioral performance across cognitive domains. Traditionally, this variability has been linked to significant differences in the stimulation protocols across studies, including stimulation parameters, target regions, and electrodes montage. Here, we reviewed and discussed evidence of heterogeneity emerging at the intra-study level, namely inter-individual differences that may influence the response to tDCS within each study. This source of variability has been largely neglected by literature, being results mainly analyzed at the group level. Previous research, however, highlighted that only a half—or less—of studies’ participants could be classified as responders, being affected by tDCS in the expected direction. Stable and variable inter-individual differences, such as morphological and genetic features vs. hormonal/exogenous substance consumption, partially account for this heterogeneity. Moreover, variability comes from experiments’ contextual elements, such as participants’ engagement/baseline capacity and individual task difficulty. We concluded that increasing knowledge on inter-dividual differences rather than undermining tDCS effectiveness could enhance protocols’ efficiency and reproducibility.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:14:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-934dc6884ba3491c8d26fd80954dd6b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:14:45Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-934dc6884ba3491c8d26fd80954dd6b82023-11-23T10:16:32ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252022-04-0112552210.3390/brainsci12050522Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual FactorsAlessandra Vergallito0Sarah Feroldi1Alberto Pisoni2Leonor J. Romero Lauro3Department of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, ItalySchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20854 Monza, ItalyDepartment of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, ItalyDepartment of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milano, ItalyDue to its safety, portability, and cheapness, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) use largely increased in research and clinical settings. Despite tDCS’s wide application, previous works pointed out inconsistent and low replicable results, sometimes leading to extreme conclusions about tDCS’s ineffectiveness in modulating behavioral performance across cognitive domains. Traditionally, this variability has been linked to significant differences in the stimulation protocols across studies, including stimulation parameters, target regions, and electrodes montage. Here, we reviewed and discussed evidence of heterogeneity emerging at the intra-study level, namely inter-individual differences that may influence the response to tDCS within each study. This source of variability has been largely neglected by literature, being results mainly analyzed at the group level. Previous research, however, highlighted that only a half—or less—of studies’ participants could be classified as responders, being affected by tDCS in the expected direction. Stable and variable inter-individual differences, such as morphological and genetic features vs. hormonal/exogenous substance consumption, partially account for this heterogeneity. Moreover, variability comes from experiments’ contextual elements, such as participants’ engagement/baseline capacity and individual task difficulty. We concluded that increasing knowledge on inter-dividual differences rather than undermining tDCS effectiveness could enhance protocols’ efficiency and reproducibility.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/5/522tDCSinter-individual differencesinter-subject variabilityreproducibilitynoninvasive brain stimulation
spellingShingle Alessandra Vergallito
Sarah Feroldi
Alberto Pisoni
Leonor J. Romero Lauro
Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
Brain Sciences
tDCS
inter-individual differences
inter-subject variability
reproducibility
noninvasive brain stimulation
title Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
title_full Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
title_fullStr Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
title_short Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors
title_sort inter individual variability in tdcs effects a narrative review on the contribution of stable variable and contextual factors
topic tDCS
inter-individual differences
inter-subject variability
reproducibility
noninvasive brain stimulation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/5/522
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandravergallito interindividualvariabilityintdcseffectsanarrativereviewonthecontributionofstablevariableandcontextualfactors
AT sarahferoldi interindividualvariabilityintdcseffectsanarrativereviewonthecontributionofstablevariableandcontextualfactors
AT albertopisoni interindividualvariabilityintdcseffectsanarrativereviewonthecontributionofstablevariableandcontextualfactors
AT leonorjromerolauro interindividualvariabilityintdcseffectsanarrativereviewonthecontributionofstablevariableandcontextualfactors