Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective

Background and Objectives: In compliance with MCI's recommendation, a month-long Foundation Course was conducted in our institution in Aug'19. The present study was conducted to seek the opinion of the students and faculty regarding relevance of the topics included in the course to enable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shalini Sobti, Meeta Gupta, Vanita Gupta, Aditya Gupta, Satish Parihar, Vikrant Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=6;spage=3042;epage=3047;aulast=
_version_ 1818412039681343488
author Shalini Sobti
Meeta Gupta
Vanita Gupta
Aditya Gupta
Satish Parihar
Vikrant Singh
author_facet Shalini Sobti
Meeta Gupta
Vanita Gupta
Aditya Gupta
Satish Parihar
Vikrant Singh
author_sort Shalini Sobti
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives: In compliance with MCI's recommendation, a month-long Foundation Course was conducted in our institution in Aug'19. The present study was conducted to seek the opinion of the students and faculty regarding relevance of the topics included in the course to enable revisions to be made in designing the course for the subsequent sessions, to make it more effective and student-oriented. Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted to seek the opinion of 100 students who underwent the Foundation Course and 35 faculty members who were involved in teaching the topics allotted. Results: Positive feedback was recorded from63% of the students and 69% of the faculty regarding the overall experience of the course. Among the different modules, Skills module was voted as relevant by majority (73%) of students, whereas a module on Enhancement of Language and Computer Skills was found relevant to the course by a mere 52% students. In contrast, module on Sports and Extracurricular activities was adjudged as most relevant while as module on Enhancement of Language and Computer Skills got the least positive feedback (81.43% vs. 60.36%, respectively) from the faculty. Interpretation and Conclusions: Foundation Course recommended by MCI for MBBS students at the entry level is a welcome step. This can further be made more beneficial by making necessary modifications in the planning of the course in light of suggestions received from the participants.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T10:40:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-934de8d3f2a84bf9898399bdcc858e02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-4863
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T10:40:58Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj.art-934de8d3f2a84bf9898399bdcc858e022022-12-21T23:05:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632020-01-01963042304710.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_521_20Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspectiveShalini SobtiMeeta GuptaVanita GuptaAditya GuptaSatish PariharVikrant SinghBackground and Objectives: In compliance with MCI's recommendation, a month-long Foundation Course was conducted in our institution in Aug'19. The present study was conducted to seek the opinion of the students and faculty regarding relevance of the topics included in the course to enable revisions to be made in designing the course for the subsequent sessions, to make it more effective and student-oriented. Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted to seek the opinion of 100 students who underwent the Foundation Course and 35 faculty members who were involved in teaching the topics allotted. Results: Positive feedback was recorded from63% of the students and 69% of the faculty regarding the overall experience of the course. Among the different modules, Skills module was voted as relevant by majority (73%) of students, whereas a module on Enhancement of Language and Computer Skills was found relevant to the course by a mere 52% students. In contrast, module on Sports and Extracurricular activities was adjudged as most relevant while as module on Enhancement of Language and Computer Skills got the least positive feedback (81.43% vs. 60.36%, respectively) from the faculty. Interpretation and Conclusions: Foundation Course recommended by MCI for MBBS students at the entry level is a welcome step. This can further be made more beneficial by making necessary modifications in the planning of the course in light of suggestions received from the participants.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=6;spage=3042;epage=3047;aulast=cross-sectional studyfeedbackfoundation coursequestionnaire
spellingShingle Shalini Sobti
Meeta Gupta
Vanita Gupta
Aditya Gupta
Satish Parihar
Vikrant Singh
Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
cross-sectional study
feedback
foundation course
questionnaire
title Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
title_full Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
title_fullStr Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
title_short Assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates: students' vs faculty's perspective
title_sort assessment of newly introduced foundation course for medical undergraduates students vs faculty s perspective
topic cross-sectional study
feedback
foundation course
questionnaire
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=6;spage=3042;epage=3047;aulast=
work_keys_str_mv AT shalinisobti assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective
AT meetagupta assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective
AT vanitagupta assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective
AT adityagupta assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective
AT satishparihar assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective
AT vikrantsingh assessmentofnewlyintroducedfoundationcourseformedicalundergraduatesstudentsvsfacultysperspective