The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and 10% citric acid (CA) on the push-out bond strength of ProRooT MTA and Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty. Materials and Methods Eighty single-rooted extracted human te...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Istanbul University
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | European Oral Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/45575/572502 |
| _version_ | 1797914821314740224 |
|---|---|
| author | Arife Kaptan Fatih Öznurhan Burak Buldur |
| author_facet | Arife Kaptan Fatih Öznurhan Burak Buldur |
| author_sort | Arife Kaptan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and 10% citric acid (CA) on the push-out bond strength of ProRooT MTA and Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty. Materials and Methods Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were instrumented to obtain a standardized immature teeth model. Based on the chelating agents tested, the specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups: Group 1 (17% EDTA), Group 2 (7% MA), Group 3 (10% CA), and Group 4 (Positive Control) (n=20 for each group). Each group was further classified into two subgroups: Group A (ProRoot MTA) and Group B (Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty) (n=10 for each subgroup). After irrigation and placement of cements, teeth were stored at 37°C and in 100% humidity for a week. A total of 240 dentine discs (three discs per teeth) were obtained and subjected to push-out assay. Data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc t-test. Results Both types of chelating agent and calcium silicate-based cement were significantly associated with the push-out bond strength values. The push-out bond strength was significantly less for CA as compared to EDTA or MA. ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA (p<0.05). Conclusion The use of chelating agents increased the push-out bond strength of CSC. Regardless of tested chelating agents, ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:32:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-935140dabdb74a6e8c93bc4f2bd25bd8 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2630-6158 2651-2823 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:32:13Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | Istanbul University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Oral Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-935140dabdb74a6e8c93bc4f2bd25bd82023-02-15T16:14:50ZengIstanbul UniversityEuropean Oral Research2630-61582651-28232019-05-01532889310.26650/eor.201916184The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair materialArife KaptanFatih ÖznurhanBurak BuldurPurpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 7% maleic acid (MA), and 10% citric acid (CA) on the push-out bond strength of ProRooT MTA and Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty. Materials and Methods Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were instrumented to obtain a standardized immature teeth model. Based on the chelating agents tested, the specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups: Group 1 (17% EDTA), Group 2 (7% MA), Group 3 (10% CA), and Group 4 (Positive Control) (n=20 for each group). Each group was further classified into two subgroups: Group A (ProRoot MTA) and Group B (Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty) (n=10 for each subgroup). After irrigation and placement of cements, teeth were stored at 37°C and in 100% humidity for a week. A total of 240 dentine discs (three discs per teeth) were obtained and subjected to push-out assay. Data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc t-test. Results Both types of chelating agent and calcium silicate-based cement were significantly associated with the push-out bond strength values. The push-out bond strength was significantly less for CA as compared to EDTA or MA. ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA (p<0.05). Conclusion The use of chelating agents increased the push-out bond strength of CSC. Regardless of tested chelating agents, ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/45575/572502calcium silicate-based cementcheating agentendosequence root repair materialpush-out bond strength |
| spellingShingle | Arife Kaptan Fatih Öznurhan Burak Buldur The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material European Oral Research calcium silicate-based cement cheating agent endosequence root repair material push-out bond strength |
| title | The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| title_full | The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| title_fullStr | The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| title_short | The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| title_sort | effect of different chelating agents on the push out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material |
| topic | calcium silicate-based cement cheating agent endosequence root repair material push-out bond strength |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eor/issue/45575/572502 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arifekaptan theeffectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial AT fatihoznurhan theeffectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial AT burakbuldur theeffectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial AT arifekaptan effectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial AT fatihoznurhan effectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial AT burakbuldur effectofdifferentchelatingagentsonthepushoutbondstrengthofprorootmtaandendosequencerootrepairmaterial |