Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study

Introduction: The imprint produced by the lip is termed as ‘lip print’ and the name given to the examination of lip print is referred to as cheiloscopy. Aim: The present study was done to compare the efficacy of three different materials used in cheiloscopy – Sudan III, Indigo and Aluminium pow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjaly Dolly, Charlotte Rodrigues, Rashmi Bankur, Pillai Arun Gopinathan, Rakhee Sharma, Annapurna Doddamani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8653/21410_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(NE_AP)_PFA(AK)_PF2(EKAK).pdf
_version_ 1818312046503002112
author Anjaly Dolly
Charlotte Rodrigues
Rashmi Bankur
Pillai Arun Gopinathan
Rakhee Sharma
Annapurna Doddamani
author_facet Anjaly Dolly
Charlotte Rodrigues
Rashmi Bankur
Pillai Arun Gopinathan
Rakhee Sharma
Annapurna Doddamani
author_sort Anjaly Dolly
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The imprint produced by the lip is termed as ‘lip print’ and the name given to the examination of lip print is referred to as cheiloscopy. Aim: The present study was done to compare the efficacy of three different materials used in cheiloscopy – Sudan III, Indigo and Aluminium powder. Material and Methods: A total of 60 individuals belonging to the age group of 18-25 years were included in this study. Visible and latent lip prints were reproduced on white cotton fabric, white satin fabric and white clay cup. The results were statistically analysed using chi square test. Results: Sudan III dye and Aluminium powder showed significant results when used for the development of visible lip prints (p<0.05), but didn’t give any significant results for development of latent lip prints. Indigo dye gave significant results for development of both visible and latent lip prints (p<0.05). Conclusion: The study reveals the usefulness of visible and latent lip print in individual identification.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:11:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9362917bb0ef43f7842acfb231c6f1f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:11:37Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-9362917bb0ef43f7842acfb231c6f1f22022-12-21T23:54:13ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-10-011010ZC67ZC7110.7860/JCDR/2016/21410.8653Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative StudyAnjaly Dolly0Charlotte Rodrigues1Rashmi Bankur2Pillai Arun Gopinathan3Rakhee Sharma4Annapurna Doddamani5Dental Officer, ECHS Polyclinic, Thanakandam Complex, Kurishumudu, Changanassery, Kerala, India.Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, M R Ambedkar Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.Dental Health Officer, Department of Service Clinic, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Sri Sankara Dental College, Varkala, Akathamuri, Kerala, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Geetanjali Dental and Research Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. Consultant Oral Pathologist, KDC Dental Care and Implant Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Introduction: The imprint produced by the lip is termed as ‘lip print’ and the name given to the examination of lip print is referred to as cheiloscopy. Aim: The present study was done to compare the efficacy of three different materials used in cheiloscopy – Sudan III, Indigo and Aluminium powder. Material and Methods: A total of 60 individuals belonging to the age group of 18-25 years were included in this study. Visible and latent lip prints were reproduced on white cotton fabric, white satin fabric and white clay cup. The results were statistically analysed using chi square test. Results: Sudan III dye and Aluminium powder showed significant results when used for the development of visible lip prints (p<0.05), but didn’t give any significant results for development of latent lip prints. Indigo dye gave significant results for development of both visible and latent lip prints (p<0.05). Conclusion: The study reveals the usefulness of visible and latent lip print in individual identification.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8653/21410_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(NE_AP)_PFA(AK)_PF2(EKAK).pdfaluminium powderindigolatent lip printssudan iiivisible lip prints
spellingShingle Anjaly Dolly
Charlotte Rodrigues
Rashmi Bankur
Pillai Arun Gopinathan
Rakhee Sharma
Annapurna Doddamani
Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
aluminium powder
indigo
latent lip prints
sudan iii
visible lip prints
title Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Materials Used in Cheiloscopy –A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of efficacy of three different materials used in cheiloscopy a comparative study
topic aluminium powder
indigo
latent lip prints
sudan iii
visible lip prints
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8653/21410_CE(EK)_F(AK)_PF1(NE_AP)_PFA(AK)_PF2(EKAK).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalydolly evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy
AT charlotterodrigues evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy
AT rashmibankur evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy
AT pillaiarungopinathan evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy
AT rakheesharma evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy
AT annapurnadoddamani evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentmaterialsusedincheiloscopyacomparativestudy