The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly

The author attempts to trace the formation of the concept of the subject, beginning with its conceptualization in classical philosophy up to its current state, i.e. reconceptualization. There are three projects of conceptualization of the subject in Western philosophy. The first one has to do with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R. R. Karneev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2022-03-01
Series:Концепт: философия, религия, культура
Subjects:
Online Access:https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/596
_version_ 1797231891608240128
author R. R. Karneev
author_facet R. R. Karneev
author_sort R. R. Karneev
collection DOAJ
description The author attempts to trace the formation of the concept of the subject, beginning with its conceptualization in classical philosophy up to its current state, i.e. reconceptualization. There are three projects of conceptualization of the subject in Western philosophy. The first one has to do with the conceptualization of the subject in classical philosophy from Descartes to Hegel. The concept of the subject was conceived as transparent and operative in regard to a passive object which can eliminate all subjective qualities. The second project is devoted to the deconceptualization of the subject that means the critique of the classical concept of the subject, the discovery of objective forces, such as power, language, the unconscious, society, which impact the subject and reduce its subjectivity to objectivity. The third one is about the reconceptualization of the subject: rethinking of the classical concept of the subject, given the critique undertaken within the deconceptualization project. The project of subject reconceptualization deals with a paradoxical situation: despite the objective determination of the subject, the subject remains the subject not reducible to an object. The subject appears non-substantial and non-transparent, disconnected, historical and temporal. The contemporary conception of the subject is constructed in such a way that the subject is never the subject yet, but always presupposes a future subject capable of freely choosing its subjectivity from a multitude of contradictory options. The article suggests a new perspective on the subject, which is seen not only as a human actor, but also as a complex of various objects that behave as subjects, that is, can make objects of themselves. The article shows that before the Cartesian moment the concept of the subject did not exist but was explicitly assumed. Referring to the concept of Foucault, Bourdieu, Althusser and Butler, the author shows the process of the formation of the subject as dependable on power, which is a condition and a possibility for subject to form. Therefore, power addresses to the absent subject as an already formed subject, thereby shaping it and bringing subjectivity into the currently forming subject. The following questions are thus raised: when does the subject become the subject? What precedes the subject? The author attempts to demonstrate that the subject is formed, in a void, since there was nothing before the subject, and it is the subject itself that is eventually formed.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:20:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9366804993ce4591951aab1b1317df22
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2541-8831
2619-0540
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:51:35Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Концепт: философия, религия, культура
spelling doaj.art-9366804993ce4591951aab1b1317df222024-04-01T11:29:28ZengMGIMO University PressКонцепт: философия, религия, культура2541-88312619-05402022-03-016171910.24833/2541-8831-2022-1-21-7-19461The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete AssemblyR. R. Karneev0Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow City UniversityThe author attempts to trace the formation of the concept of the subject, beginning with its conceptualization in classical philosophy up to its current state, i.e. reconceptualization. There are three projects of conceptualization of the subject in Western philosophy. The first one has to do with the conceptualization of the subject in classical philosophy from Descartes to Hegel. The concept of the subject was conceived as transparent and operative in regard to a passive object which can eliminate all subjective qualities. The second project is devoted to the deconceptualization of the subject that means the critique of the classical concept of the subject, the discovery of objective forces, such as power, language, the unconscious, society, which impact the subject and reduce its subjectivity to objectivity. The third one is about the reconceptualization of the subject: rethinking of the classical concept of the subject, given the critique undertaken within the deconceptualization project. The project of subject reconceptualization deals with a paradoxical situation: despite the objective determination of the subject, the subject remains the subject not reducible to an object. The subject appears non-substantial and non-transparent, disconnected, historical and temporal. The contemporary conception of the subject is constructed in such a way that the subject is never the subject yet, but always presupposes a future subject capable of freely choosing its subjectivity from a multitude of contradictory options. The article suggests a new perspective on the subject, which is seen not only as a human actor, but also as a complex of various objects that behave as subjects, that is, can make objects of themselves. The article shows that before the Cartesian moment the concept of the subject did not exist but was explicitly assumed. Referring to the concept of Foucault, Bourdieu, Althusser and Butler, the author shows the process of the formation of the subject as dependable on power, which is a condition and a possibility for subject to form. Therefore, power addresses to the absent subject as an already formed subject, thereby shaping it and bringing subjectivity into the currently forming subject. The following questions are thus raised: when does the subject become the subject? What precedes the subject? The author attempts to demonstrate that the subject is formed, in a void, since there was nothing before the subject, and it is the subject itself that is eventually formed.https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/596subjectivityconcept of subjectphilosophy of subjectivitybadioužižeksubject/object dualismediscourse of power
spellingShingle R. R. Karneev
The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
Концепт: философия, религия, культура
subjectivity
concept of subject
philosophy of subjectivity
badiou
žižek
subject/object dualisme
discourse of power
title The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
title_full The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
title_fullStr The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
title_full_unstemmed The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
title_short The Project of the Reconceptualization of the Subject: Incomplete Assembly
title_sort project of the reconceptualization of the subject incomplete assembly
topic subjectivity
concept of subject
philosophy of subjectivity
badiou
žižek
subject/object dualisme
discourse of power
url https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/596
work_keys_str_mv AT rrkarneev theprojectofthereconceptualizationofthesubjectincompleteassembly
AT rrkarneev projectofthereconceptualizationofthesubjectincompleteassembly