A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yongkang Huang, Yongjian Pei, Yajuan Qian, Zhen Yao, Chen Chen, Juan Du, Minhua Shi, Tong Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124/full
_version_ 1828779249702535168
author Yongkang Huang
Yongjian Pei
Yajuan Qian
Zhen Yao
Chen Chen
Juan Du
Minhua Shi
Tong Zhou
author_facet Yongkang Huang
Yongjian Pei
Yajuan Qian
Zhen Yao
Chen Chen
Juan Du
Minhua Shi
Tong Zhou
author_sort Yongkang Huang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD.MethodsWe performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration).ResultsA total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight.ConclusionBacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.Systematic Review Registration[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420].
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:57:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-936b68cdc52e462ab953ac92c902f045
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:57:58Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-936b68cdc52e462ab953ac92c902f0452022-12-22T00:57:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-06-01910.3389/fmed.2022.877124877124A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseYongkang Huang0Yongjian Pei1Yajuan Qian2Zhen Yao3Chen Chen4Juan Du5Minhua Shi6Tong Zhou7Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, ChinaBackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD.MethodsWe performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration).ResultsA total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight.ConclusionBacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.Systematic Review Registration[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420].https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124/fullchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasebacteria lysatesOM-85Ismigenefficacysafety
spellingShingle Yongkang Huang
Yongjian Pei
Yajuan Qian
Zhen Yao
Chen Chen
Juan Du
Minhua Shi
Tong Zhou
A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Frontiers in Medicine
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
bacteria lysates
OM-85
Ismigen
efficacy
safety
title A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_short A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_sort meta analysis on the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
bacteria lysates
OM-85
Ismigen
efficacy
safety
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yongkanghuang ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yongjianpei ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yajuanqian ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT zhenyao ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT chenchen ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT juandu ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT minhuashi ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT tongzhou ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yongkanghuang metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yongjianpei metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yajuanqian metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT zhenyao metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT chenchen metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT juandu metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT minhuashi metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT tongzhou metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease