Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization
Porosity and pore size distribution (PSD) are essential petrophysical parameters controlling permeability and storage capacity in shale gas reservoirs. Various techniques to assess pore structure have been introduced; nevertheless, discrepancies and inconsistencies exist between each of them. This s...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2094 |
| _version_ | 1828153563205861376 |
|---|---|
| author | Yujie Yuan Reza Rezaee |
| author_facet | Yujie Yuan Reza Rezaee |
| author_sort | Yujie Yuan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Porosity and pore size distribution (PSD) are essential petrophysical parameters controlling permeability and storage capacity in shale gas reservoirs. Various techniques to assess pore structure have been introduced; nevertheless, discrepancies and inconsistencies exist between each of them. This study compares the porosity and PSD in two different shale formations, i.e., the clay-rich Permian Carynginia Formation in the Perth Basin, Western Australia, and the clay-poor Monterey Formation in San Joaquin Basin, USA. Porosity and PSD have been interpreted based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), low-pressure N<sub>2</sub> gas adsorption (LP-N<sub>2</sub>-GA), mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) and helium expansion porosimetry. The results highlight NMR with the advantage of detecting the full-scaled size of pores that are not accessible by MICP, and the ineffective/closed pores occupied by clay bound water (CBW) that are not approachable by other penetration techniques (e.g., helium expansion, low-pressure gas adsorption and MICP). The NMR porosity is largely discrepant with the helium porosity and the MICP porosity in clay-rich Carynginia shales, but a high consistency is displayed in clay-poor Monterey shales, implying the impact of clay contents on the distinction of shale pore structure interpretations between different measurements. Further, the CBW, which is calculated by subtracting the measured effective porosity from total porosity, presents a good linear correlation with the clay content (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76), implying that our correlated equation is adaptable to estimate the CBW in shale formations with the dominant clay type of illite. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:27:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-93754aab88c44f50819471535b6e1082 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:27:35Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj.art-93754aab88c44f50819471535b6e10822022-12-22T03:59:37ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-05-011211209410.3390/en12112094en12112094Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir CharacterizationYujie Yuan0Reza Rezaee1Western Australian School of Mines, Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, AustraliaWestern Australian School of Mines, Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, AustraliaPorosity and pore size distribution (PSD) are essential petrophysical parameters controlling permeability and storage capacity in shale gas reservoirs. Various techniques to assess pore structure have been introduced; nevertheless, discrepancies and inconsistencies exist between each of them. This study compares the porosity and PSD in two different shale formations, i.e., the clay-rich Permian Carynginia Formation in the Perth Basin, Western Australia, and the clay-poor Monterey Formation in San Joaquin Basin, USA. Porosity and PSD have been interpreted based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), low-pressure N<sub>2</sub> gas adsorption (LP-N<sub>2</sub>-GA), mercury intrusion capillary pressure (MICP) and helium expansion porosimetry. The results highlight NMR with the advantage of detecting the full-scaled size of pores that are not accessible by MICP, and the ineffective/closed pores occupied by clay bound water (CBW) that are not approachable by other penetration techniques (e.g., helium expansion, low-pressure gas adsorption and MICP). The NMR porosity is largely discrepant with the helium porosity and the MICP porosity in clay-rich Carynginia shales, but a high consistency is displayed in clay-poor Monterey shales, implying the impact of clay contents on the distinction of shale pore structure interpretations between different measurements. Further, the CBW, which is calculated by subtracting the measured effective porosity from total porosity, presents a good linear correlation with the clay content (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76), implying that our correlated equation is adaptable to estimate the CBW in shale formations with the dominant clay type of illite.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2094gas shaleNMRhelium porosimetryclay bound waterporositypore size distributionlow-pressure gas adsorptionMICP |
| spellingShingle | Yujie Yuan Reza Rezaee Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization Energies gas shale NMR helium porosimetry clay bound water porosity pore size distribution low-pressure gas adsorption MICP |
| title | Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization |
| title_full | Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization |
| title_short | Comparative Porosity and Pore Structure Assessment in Shales: Measurement Techniques, Influencing Factors and Implications for Reservoir Characterization |
| title_sort | comparative porosity and pore structure assessment in shales measurement techniques influencing factors and implications for reservoir characterization |
| topic | gas shale NMR helium porosimetry clay bound water porosity pore size distribution low-pressure gas adsorption MICP |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/11/2094 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yujieyuan comparativeporosityandporestructureassessmentinshalesmeasurementtechniquesinfluencingfactorsandimplicationsforreservoircharacterization AT rezarezaee comparativeporosityandporestructureassessmentinshalesmeasurementtechniquesinfluencingfactorsandimplicationsforreservoircharacterization |