Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie
The following paper is dedicated to the analysis of 41 proper names (including 18 historical names) of structures in Cracow used for crossing water and terrain, identified architecturally as bridges, footbridges, trestle bridges and flyovers. These names have got a rather distinct structure: the ant...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
University of the National Education Commission, Krakow
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://studialinguistica.up.krakow.pl/article/view/7629 |
| _version_ | 1797427433618538496 |
|---|---|
| author | Krystyna Kowalik |
| author_facet | Krystyna Kowalik |
| author_sort | Krystyna Kowalik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The following paper is dedicated to the analysis of 41 proper names (including 18 historical names) of structures in Cracow used for crossing water and terrain, identified architecturally as bridges, footbridges, trestle bridges and flyovers. These names have got a rather distinct structure: the anteposition contains a generic name, while the postposition comprises an individualising determinant, such as an adjective or a noun in genitive case, less frequently nominative: most Dębnicki (bridge), most Wandy (bridge), most Lajkonik (bridge); kładka Ojca Bernatka (footbridge), estakada Obrońców Lwowa (trestle bridge). Most of these terms have toponymic or anthroponymic motivation connected with Cracow, others belong to exceptions. There is a tendency for using commemorative names, introduced with the preposition imienia/im. (named after): most im. Kardynała Franciszka Macharskiego. Due to the fact that these structures are located in the city, their names belong to urbanonymy. The physical appearance and function of these facilities make it possible to apply in their names the notion of hodonymy. In the Russian language the term gefironim has been used in reference to these names. In terms of the type of denoted structures, the notion gefironim is narrower than an urbanonym, but it is wider when it comes to the area in which these structures are located. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:45:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-93801e2446484f63acadbfbcea1c8f8f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2083-1765 |
| language | ces |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:45:02Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | University of the National Education Commission, Krakow |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica |
| spelling | doaj.art-93801e2446484f63acadbfbcea1c8f8f2023-12-02T15:41:18ZcesUniversity of the National Education Commission, KrakowAnnales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica2083-17652020-12-011510.24917/20831765.15.11Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawieKrystyna Kowalik0Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN, KrakówThe following paper is dedicated to the analysis of 41 proper names (including 18 historical names) of structures in Cracow used for crossing water and terrain, identified architecturally as bridges, footbridges, trestle bridges and flyovers. These names have got a rather distinct structure: the anteposition contains a generic name, while the postposition comprises an individualising determinant, such as an adjective or a noun in genitive case, less frequently nominative: most Dębnicki (bridge), most Wandy (bridge), most Lajkonik (bridge); kładka Ojca Bernatka (footbridge), estakada Obrońców Lwowa (trestle bridge). Most of these terms have toponymic or anthroponymic motivation connected with Cracow, others belong to exceptions. There is a tendency for using commemorative names, introduced with the preposition imienia/im. (named after): most im. Kardynała Franciszka Macharskiego. Due to the fact that these structures are located in the city, their names belong to urbanonymy. The physical appearance and function of these facilities make it possible to apply in their names the notion of hodonymy. In the Russian language the term gefironim has been used in reference to these names. In terms of the type of denoted structures, the notion gefironim is narrower than an urbanonym, but it is wider when it comes to the area in which these structures are located.https://studialinguistica.up.krakow.pl/article/view/7629motywacjaleksykologiaonomastykaurbanonimiagefironim |
| spellingShingle | Krystyna Kowalik Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica motywacja leksykologia onomastyka urbanonimia gefironim |
| title | Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie |
| title_full | Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie |
| title_fullStr | Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie |
| title_full_unstemmed | Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie |
| title_short | Topograficzno-historyczna geneza nazw własnych krakowskich mostów i innych budowli służących przeprawie |
| title_sort | topograficzno historyczna geneza nazw wlasnych krakowskich mostow i innych budowli sluzacych przeprawie |
| topic | motywacja leksykologia onomastyka urbanonimia gefironim |
| url | https://studialinguistica.up.krakow.pl/article/view/7629 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT krystynakowalik topograficznohistorycznagenezanazwwłasnychkrakowskichmostowiinnychbudowlisłuzacychprzeprawie |